Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online May 26, 2020

Seeing Is Believing: An Experiment on Absentee Ballots and Voter Confidence: Part of Special Symposium on Election Sciences

Abstract

Since the 2000 election, researchers have taken an interest in the role of voter confidence and its importance as an assessment of public trust in electoral outcomes. Many factors may influence voter confidence including the way in which a voter casts their ballot. Previous research has found that absentee voters consistently report the lowest levels of confidence that their votes were counted correctly. This study uses an experiment to examine how voting method impacts voter confidence. Voters were randomly assigned to either an in-person or absentee voting condition. Participants assigned to the absentee condition expressed lower levels of confidence that their votes would be counted correctly than those assigned to the in-person voting condition. Voters who had to ask for assistance during the experiment also reported lower levels of confidence. This could have implications for voter confidence levels nationally as vote-by-mail continues to grow in popularity.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Alvarez R. M., Atkeson L. R., Hall T. E. (Eds.). (2012). Confirming elections: Creating confidence and integrity through election auditing. Palgrave Macmillan.
Alvarez R. M., Hall T. E., Llewellyn M. (2008). Are Americans confident their ballots are counted? The Journal of Politics, 70(3), 754–766.
Atkeson L. R. (2014). Voter confidence in 2010: Local, state, and national factors. In Michael Alvarez R., Bernard Grofman (Eds.), Election administration in the United States: The state of reform after Bush v. Gore (pp. 101–119). Cambridge University Press.
Atkeson L. R., Alvarez R. M., Hall T. E. (2009). Assessing electoral performance in New Mexico using and ecosystem approach: Combined report university of New Mexico (205 pages). CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project, University of Utah.
Atkeson L. R., Alvarez R. M., Hall T. E. (2015). Voter confidence: How to measure it and how it differs from government support. Election Law Journal, 14(3), 207–219.
Bryant L. A., Gronke P. (2017, April 6–9). A first look at voter confidence and trust in American elections in 2016 [Paper presentation]. Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
Burden B. C., Gaines B. J. (2015). Presidential commission on election administration: Absentee and early voting: Weighing the costs of convenience. Election Law Journal, 14(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2014.0270
Claassen R. L., Magleby D. B., Monson J. Q., Patterson K. J. (2013). Voter confidence and the election-day voting experience. Political Behavior, 35(2), 215–235.
Druckman J. N., Kam C. K. (2011). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the “narrow data base” In Druckman J.N., Green D.P., Kuklinski J.H., Lupia A. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Poltical Science. Cambridge University Press.
Sances M. W., Stewart C. III. (2015). Partisanship and confidence in the vote count: Evidence from U.S. national elections since 2000. Electoral Studies, 40, 176–188.
Stewart C. III, Alvarez R. M., Hall T. E. (2010). Voting technology and the election experience: The 2009 gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia (VTP Working Paper No. #99). CalTech/MITVoting Technology Project.

Biographies

Lisa A. Bryant is an assistant professor of Political Science at California State University, Fresno. Her research focuses on election administration, political behavior/voter behavior, campaigns and elections, public opinion, women’s representation, and survey and experimental methodology.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

Please find the following supplemental material visualised and available to download via Figshare in the display box below. Where there are more than one item, you can scroll through each tab to see each separate item.

Please note all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is here associated with

Summary

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

Resources

File (essympsium_apr_voterconfidence_experiment_rr2_appendix.pdf)

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: May 26, 2020
Issue published: November 2020

Keywords

  1. voter confidence
  2. absentee
  3. vote-by-mail
  4. experiment
  5. ballot

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2020.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Notes

Lisa A. Bryant, California State University, Fresno, 2225 E. San Ramon, Fresno, CA 93740, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in American Politics Research.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 935

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 4 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 6

  1. Access or Experience? Determinants of Distrust in US Elections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The Impact of Voter Education on Voter Confidence: Evidence from the 2...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. How COVID-19 Election Access Policies Shaped Voter Fraud Beliefs and V...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The Pandemic and Vote Mode Choice in the 2020 Election
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Should I vote-by-mail or in person? The impact of COVID-19 risk factor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. “The High Mass of Democracy” —Why Germany Remains Aloof to the Idea of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text