![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The purpose of this extended commentary article is to frame the set of studies in the first of two issues and recommend areas of inquiry for future research. This special series issue features studies examining the technical qualities of formative assessment procedures that were developed to inform intervention. This article intends to emphasize issues in the current set of studies that do not appear central to early numeracy curriculum-based measurement (EN-CBM) research. To the extent possible, we expect that this two-volume series will result in scientific and practical advances. Despite this lofty intention, this series can neither represent all issues important to stakeholders nor characterize the full body of applied and basic research in early numeracy assessment. As such, we focus on a set of theoretical frameworks to guide the current and future development of EN-CBM.
References
Section:
|
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Ancker, J. S., Kaufman, D. (2007). Rethinking health numeracy: A multidisciplinary literature review. Journal of the American Medical Information Association, 14, 713–721. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Baroody, A. J. (2004). The developmental bases for early childhood operations and number standards. In Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 173–220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333–339. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–144. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Brinkworth, P. (1985). Numeracy: What, why, how? Australian Mathematics Teacher, 41, 8–10. Google Scholar | |
|
Christ, T. J., Scullin, S., Tolbize, A., Jiban, C. L. (2008). Implications of recent research: Curriculum-based measurement of math computation. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 198–205. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Clements, D. H. (2004). Major themes and recommendations. In Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 7–12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Cohen, L., Campbell, J. I. D. (2005). Three parietal circuits for number processing. In Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 433–453). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Deno, S. L. (1992). The nature and development of curriculum-based measurement. Preventing School Failure, 36, 5. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Desoete, A., Ceulemans, A., Roeyers, H., Huylebroeck, A. (2009). Subitizing or counting as possible screening variables for learning disabilities in mathematics education or learning? Educational Research Review, 4, 55–66. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Donelle, L., Hoffman-Goetz, L., Arocha, J. F. (2007). Assessing health numeracy among community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 651–665. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Fagan, T. K. (1999). Training school psychologists before there were school psychologist training programs: A history. In Reynolds, C. R., Gutkin, T. B. (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 2–33). New York, NY: John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Floyd, R. G., Hojnoski, R., Key, J. (2006). Preliminary evidence of the technical adequacy of the preschool numeracy indicators. School Psychology Review, 35, 627–644. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Fuchs, L. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33, 188–192. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Griffin, S. A., Case, R., Siegler, R. S. (1994). Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for first formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure. In McGilly, K. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 25–49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Griffin, S. A., Clements, D. (2007). Number worlds: A prevention/intervention curriculum. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates. Google Scholar | |
|
Hintze, J. M., Christ, T. J., Methe, S. A. (2006). Curriculum-based assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 45–56. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hosp, J. L. (in press). Using assessment data to make decisions about teaching and learning. In Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Urdan, T. (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 3. Application to learning and teaching (pp. 87–109). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar | |
|
Hosp, M. K., Hosp, J. L., Howell, K. W. (2007). The ABCs of CBM: A practical guide to curriculum-based measurement. New York, NY: Guilford. Google Scholar | |
|
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. N., Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 36–46. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lago, R. M., DiPerna, J. C. (2010). Number sense in kindergarten: A factor-analytic study of the construct. School Psychology Review, 39, 164–180. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Lawrence, E. D. (2010). What Americans know and why it matters for politics [Electronic Version]. Retrieved from http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/cces/files/Lawrence-_What_Americans_Know.pdf. Google Scholar | |
|
Methe, S. A. (2009). Big ideas: Missing pieces in early mathematics assessment. Communiqué, 38, 1, 4–5. Google Scholar | |
|
Methe, S. A., McCulloch, L. M., Betts, J., Floyd, R. G., Bowler, M. B. (2011). Synthesis of early numeracy curriculum-based measurement research. Manuscript submitted for publication. Google Scholar | |
|
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics . (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through 8th grade mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
National Research Council . (Ed.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Ogden, T. E., Goldberg, I. A. (2002). Research proposals: A guide to success. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Riccomini, P. J., Witzel, B. S. (2010). Response to intervention in math. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Scott, D. (1999). Essential ingredients for numeracy. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 4, 4–8. Google Scholar | |
|
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar | |
|
Song, M. J., Ginsburg, H. P. (1987). The development of informal and formal mathematical thinking in Korean and U.S. children. Child Development, 58, 1286–1296. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wilson, A. J., Dehaene, S., Dubois, O., Fayol, M. (2009). Effects of an adaptive game intervention on accessing number sense in low-socioeconomic-status kindergarten children. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 224–234. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
