![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The purpose of this extended commentary article is to frame the set of studies in the first of two issues and recommend areas of inquiry for future research. This special series issue features studies examining the technical qualities of formative assessment procedures that were developed to inform intervention. This article intends to emphasize issues in the current set of studies that do not appear central to early numeracy curriculum-based measurement (EN-CBM) research. To the extent possible, we expect that this two-volume series will result in scientific and practical advances. Despite this lofty intention, this series can neither represent all issues important to stakeholders nor characterize the full body of applied and basic research in early numeracy assessment. As such, we focus on a set of theoretical frameworks to guide the current and future development of EN-CBM.
Keywords curriculum-based measurement, early numeracy
References
Section:
|
Baroody, A. J. (2004). The developmental bases for early childhood operations and number standards. In Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar | |
|
Berch, D. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333–339. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Borman, G. D., Overman, L. T. (2004). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 177–195. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Carnine, D., Dixon, R., Silbert, J. (1998). Effective strategies for teaching mathematics. In Kameenui, E. J., Carnine, D. (Eds.), Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (pp. 93–112). Columbus, OH: Merrill. Google Scholar | |
|
Claessens, A., Duncan, G., Engel, M. (2009). Kindergarten skills and fifth-grade achievement: Evidence from the ECLS-K. Economics of Education Review, 28, 415–427. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Clarke, B., Shinn, M. R. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33, 234–248. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Clements, D. H. (2004). Major themes and recommendations. In Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., DiBiase, M. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 7–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Cohen, L. (2005). Three parietal circuits for number processing. In Campbell, J. I. D. (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 433–453). New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., . . . Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Fuchs, L. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33, 188–192. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Harniss, M. K., Stein, M., Carnine, D. (2002). Promoting mathematics achievement. In Shinn, M. R., Walker, H. M., Stoner, G. (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems: II. Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 571–587). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists. Google Scholar | |
|
Hosp, J. L. (2011). From the editor. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 199. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Howell, K. W., Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Google Scholar | |
|
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Methe, S. A., Hojnoski, R., Clarke, B., Owens, B. B., Lilley, P. K., Politylo, B. C., . . . Marcotte, A. M. (2011). Innovations and future directions for early numeracy curriculum-based measurement: Commentary on the special series. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 200–209. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Methe, S. A., VanDerHeyden, A. M. (in press). Response to intervention for early mathematics. In Buysse, V., Peisner-Feinberg, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Response to Intervention (RTI) in early childhood. Baltimore, MD: Brookes. Google Scholar | |
|
Newcombe, N. S., Ambady, N., Eccles, J., Gomez, L., Klahr, D., Linn, M., . . . Mix, K. (2009). Psychology’s role in mathematics and science education. American Psychologist, 64, 538–550. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Oxford, M. L., Lee, J. O. (2011). The effect of family processes on school achievement as moderated by socioeconomic context. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 597–612. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Sarama, J., Clements, D. (2009). Early child mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Wilson, A. J., Dehaene, S., Dubois, O., Fayol, M. (2009). Effects of an adaptive game intervention on accessing number sense in low-socioeconomic-status kindergarten children. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3, 224–234. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
