![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Algebra is critical to high school graduation and college success, but student achievement in algebra frequently falls significantly below expected proficiency levels. While existing research emphasizes the importance of quality algebra instruction, there is little research about how to conduct problem analysis for struggling secondary students. This article proposes an assessment model designed to analyze algebra skills for struggling students to assess basic skills in mathematics, algebraic thinking, and algebra content knowledge. Results of the study indicated sufficiently reliable data. Exploratory factor analysis of the data also found three separate factors (basic calculation skills, mathematics application, and algebra content knowledge) that underlie the data. Implications for the classroom, future research, and study limitations are discussed.
Keywords algebra, problem analysis, middle school, high school
References
Section:
|
Adoniou, M., Qing, Y. (2014). Language, mathematics, and English language learners. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 70(3), 3–11. Google Scholar | |
|
Berk, R. A. (1986). A consumer’s guide to setting performance standards on criterion-referenced tests. Review of Educational Research, 56, 137–172. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 24–34. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Booth, J. L., Newton, K. J., Twiss-Garrity, L. K. (2014). The impact of fraction magnitude knowledge on algebra performance and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 118, 110–118. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Bright, G. W., Joyner, J. M., Wallis, C. (2003). Assessing proportional thinking. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 9, 166–172. Google Scholar | |
|
Burns, M. K. (2010). Formative evaluation in school psychology: Informing the instructional process. School Psychology Forum, 4(1), 22-33. Google Scholar | |
|
Burns, M. K. (2011). Matching math interventions to students’ skill deficits. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 210–218. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Burns, M. K., Walick, C., Simonson, G. R., Dominguez, L., Harelstad, L., Kincaid, A., Nelson, G. S. (2015). Using a conceptual understanding and procedural fluency heuristic to target math interventions with students in early elementary. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30, 52–60. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Byrnes, J. P., Wasik, B. A. (1991). Role of conceptual knowledge in mathematical procedural learning. Developmental Psychology, 27, 777–786. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cai, J., Moyer, J. (2008). Developing algebraic thinking in earlier grades: Some insights from international comparative studies. Algebra and Algebraic Thinking in School Mathematics, 70, 169–180. Google Scholar | |
|
Cheung, G. W., Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Christ, T. J., Arañas, Y. A. (2014). Best practices in problem analysis. In Harrison, P., Thomas, A. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology VI (pp. 87–98). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists. Google Scholar | |
|
Christou, K. P., Vosniadou, S. (2012). What kinds of numbers do students assign to literal symbols? Aspects of the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 14, 1–27. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ferrucci, B. J., Kaur, B., Carter, J. A., Yeap, B. (2008). Using a model approach to enhancing algebraic thinking in the elementary school mathematics classroom. Algebra and Algebraic Thinking in School Mathematics, 70, 195–210. Google Scholar | |
|
Foegen, A., Morrison, C. (2010). Putting algebra progress monitoring into practice: Insights from the field. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46, 95–103. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Foegen, A., Olson, J. R., Impecoven-Lind, L. (2008). Developing progress monitoring measures for secondary mathematics: An illustration in algebra. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 240–249. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Schumacher, R. F., Hamlett, C. L., Vukovic, R. K. (2012). Contributions of domain general cognitive resources and different forms of arithmetic development to pre-algebraic knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1315–1326. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Fujimura, N. (2001). Facilitating children’s proportional reasoning: A model of reasoning processes and effects of intervention on strategy change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 589–603. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gaertner, M., Kim, J., DesJardins, S., McClarty, K. (2014). Preparing students for college and careers: The causal role of algebra II. Research in Higher Education, 55, 143–165. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hallet, D., Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Thorpe, C. M. (2012). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural fraction understanding: The role of abilities and school experience. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 469–486. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Herscovics, N., Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 59–78. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hiebert, J., Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In Hiebert, J. (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Kaufman, J. E., Schwitters, K. L. (2004). Algebra for college students (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning. Google Scholar | |
|
Kellow, J. T., Willson, V. L. (2008). Setting standards and establishing cut scores on criterion referenced assessments. In Osborne, J. W. (Ed.), Best practices in quantitative methods (pp. 15–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kinach, B. M. (2014). Generalizing: The core of algebraic thinking. Mathematics Teacher, 107, 432–439. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Koffler, S. L. (1980). A comparison of approaches for setting proficiency standards. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 167–178. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311–328. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lee, L., Freiman, V. (2006). Developing algebraic thinking through pattern exploration. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 11, 428–433. Google Scholar | |
|
Little, D. C., Box, J. A. (2011). The use of a specific schema theory strategy-semantic mapping to facilitate vocabulary development and comprehension for at-risk readers. Reading Improvement, 48, 24–31. Google Scholar | |
|
Markworth, K. A. (2012). Growing patterns: Seeing beyond counting. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19, 254–262. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mayer, R. E. (1982). Memory for algebra story problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 199–216. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Minnesota Department of Education . (2013). Minnesota K-12 academic standards in mathematics (2007). St. Paul: Author. Available from http://education.state.mn.us/ Google Scholar | |
|
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Google Scholar | |
|
National Center for Education Statistics . (2014). NAEP data explorer—12th grade mathematics. Washington, DC: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers . (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors. Google Scholar | |
|
National Mathematics Advisory Panel . (2008). Foundations for success: Final report of the national math advisory panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Google Scholar | |
|
National Research Council . (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Newton, K. J., Star, J. R., Lynch, K. (2010). Understanding the development of flexibility in struggling algebra students, mathematical thinking and learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 282–305. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Northwest Evaluation Association . (2011). Technical manual for the measures of academic progress (MAP) and measures of academic progress for primary grades (MPG). Portland, OR: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Özgün-Koca, S. A., Altay, M. K. (2009). An investigation of proportional reasoning skills of middle school students. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 2, 26–48. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pearson . (2011). All-in-one algebra 1 teaching resources. Boston, MA: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Pillay, H., Wilss, L., Boulton-Lewis, G. (1998). Sequential development of algebra knowledge: A cognitive analysis. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10, 87–102. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Powell, S. R., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. (2013). Reaching the mountaintop: Addressing the common core standards in mathematics for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 38–48. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rakes, C. R., Valentine, J. C., McGatha, M. B., Ronau, R. N. (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80, 372–400. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346–362. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). What is mathematical proficiency and how can it be assessed? Assessing Mathematical Proficiency, 53, 59–73. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Shapiro, E. S. (2010). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., Chen, M. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 691–697. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Stacey, K., MacGregor, M. (1997). Building foundations for algebra. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 2, 252–260. Google Scholar | |
|
Stage, S. A., Jacobsen, D. M. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment using oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30, 407–419. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Walkey, F. H., Welch, G. W. (2010). Demystifying factor analysis: How it works and how to use it. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris. Google Scholar | |
|
Witzel, B., Smith, S. W., Brownell, M. T. (2001). How can I help students with learning disabilities in algebra? Intervention in School and Clinic, 37, 101–104. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational psychology: Active learning edition (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Wu, H. (2001). How to prepare students for algebra. American Educator, 25(2), 10–17. Google Scholar | |
|
Zamarian, L., Lopez-Rolon, A., Delazer, M. (2007). Neuropsychological case studies on arithmetic processing. In Berch, D. B., Mazzocco, M. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 245–264). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes. Google Scholar |
