The primary purpose of this article is to further discussions of validity in mixed methods research by introducing a validation framework to guide thinking about validity in this area. To justify the use of this framework, the authors discuss traditional terminology and validity criteria for quantitative and qualitative research, as well as present recently published validity terminology for mixed methods research. The authors discuss the rationale for their framework and how it unifies thinking about validity in mixed methods research. Finally, they discuss how the framework can be used.

Adcock, R. , & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review , 95(3), 529-546.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Angen, M.J. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 378-395.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Beach, K.D. , Becker, B.J. , & Kennedy, M.M. (2006). Constructing conclusions. In C. F. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook for research in education (pp. 493-509). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Boote, D.N. , & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34, 3-15.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Campbell, D.T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54, 297-312.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Campbell, D.T. (1963a). From description to experimentation: Interpreting trends as quasi-experiments. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 212-242). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Campbell, D.T. (1963b). Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science: Investigations of man as socius (Vol. 6, pp. 94-172). New York: Rand McNally.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Campbell, D.T. , & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally .
Google Scholar
Cherryholmes, C.H. (1988). Construct validity and the discourses of research . American Journal of Education, 96(3), 421-457.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W. , & Plano Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Crocker, L. , & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical & modern test theory . Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Google Scholar
Cronbach, L.J. , & Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Dellinger, A.B. (2005). Validity and the review of literature. Research in the Schools, 12(2), 41-54.
Google Scholar
Denzin, N.K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Denzin, N.K. (1994). Evaluating qualitative research in the poststructural moment: The lessons James Joyce teaches us. Qualitative Studies in Education, 7, 295-308.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Denzin, N. K. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Eisenhart, M.A. , & Howe, K.R. (1992). Validity in educational research. In M. D. LeCompte , W. L. Millroy , & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 643-680). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Eisner, E.W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Ercikan, K. , & Roth, W.M. (2006). What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative? Educational Researcher, 35(5), 14-23.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Freeman, M. , deMarrais, K. , Preissle, J. , Roulston, K. , & St. Pierre, E.A. (2007). Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher, 36(1), 25-32.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Gliner, J.A. , & Morgan, G.A. (2000). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Goetz, J.P. , & LeCompte, M.D. (1984). Ethnography and the qualitative design in educational research. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Goodwin, L.D. , & Leech, N.L. (2003). The meaning of validity in the new standards for educational and psychological testing: Implications for measurement courses . Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development , 36, 181-191.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Greenwood, D.J. , & Levin, M. (2005). Reform of the social sciences and of universities through action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 43-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Hubley, A.M. , & Zumbo, B.D. (1996). A dialectic on validity: Where we have been and where we are going. Journal of General Psychology, 123(3), 207-215.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Johnson, R.B. , & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher , 33(7), 14-26.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Jonson, J.L. , & Plake, B.S. (1998). A historical comparison of validity standards and validity practices. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 58(5), 736-753.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Krathwohl, D.R. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. New York: Longman.
Google Scholar
Langer, E.J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Perseus.
Google Scholar
Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17, 63-84.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lather, P. (1993). Fertile obsession: Validity after poststructuralism . Sociological Quarterly, 34, 673-693.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lincoln, Y.S. , & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y.S. , & Guba, E.G. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Lord, C.G. , Ross, L. , & Lepper, M.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098-2109.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Markus, K.A. (1998). Science, measurement, and validity: Is completion of Samuel Messick's synthesis possible? Social Indicators Research, 45, 7-34.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mason, J. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 9-25.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Maxwell, J.A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research . Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-300.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Maxwell, J.A. (2004a). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33, 3-11.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Maxwell, J.A. (2004b). Using qualitative methods for causal explanation . Field Methods, 16(3), 243-264.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Messick, S. (1989a). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5-11.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Messick (1989b). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Messick, S. (1998). Test validity: A matter of consequence. Social Indicators Research, 45, 35-44.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Miles, M.B. , & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Miller, S. (2003). Impact of mixed methods and design on inference quality. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 423-455). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Moss, P.A. , & Schutz, A. (2001). Educational standards, assessment, and the search for consensus. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 37-70.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Neuman, W.L. (2004). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson Education .
Google Scholar
Newman, I. , & Benz, C.R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2003). Expanding the framework of internal and external validity in quantitative research. Research in the Schools , 10(1), 71-89.
Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. , Collins, K.M.T. , Leech, N.L. , Dellinger, A.B. , & Jiao, Q.G. (in press). A meta framework for conducting and writing rigorous, comprehensive, and insightful literature reviews. In K.M.T. Collins , A. J. Onwuegbuzie , & Q. G. Jiao (Eds.). Toward a broader understanding of stress and coping: Mixed methods approaches. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. , & Johnson, R.B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. , & Leech, N.L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice , 8(5), 375-387.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Onwuegbuzie, A.J. , & Leech, N.L. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron ? Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology , 41, 233-249.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Osterlind, S.J. (2006). Modern measurement: Theory, principles, and applications of mental appraisal. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Merrill Prentice Hall .
Google Scholar
Pedhazur, E.J. , & Schmelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. L. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Google Scholar
Richardson, L. , & St. Pierre, E.A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959-978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Sandelowski, M. , Volls, C.I. , & Barraso, J. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 29-40.
Google Scholar | Medline
Schwandt, T.A. (1996). Farewell to criteriology. Qualitative Inquiry, 2, 58-72.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Shadish, W.R. , Cook, T.D. , & Campbell, D.T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Steinke, I. (2004). Quality criteria in qualitative research. In U. Flick , E. von Kardorff , & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 184-190). London: Sage Ltd.
Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A. , & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A. , & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003a). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A. , & Teddlie, C. (2003b). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 671-702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A. , & Teddlie, C. (2006, April). Validity issues in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A. , & Teddlie, C. (in press). Quality of inferences in mixed methods research. In M. Bergman. (Ed.) Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. London : Sage Ltd.
Google Scholar
Teddlie, C. , & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Webster's new universal unabridged dictionary (2nd ed.). (1983). New York: New World Dictionaries/Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar
Whittemore, R. , Chase, S.K. , & Mandle, C.L. (2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522-537.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wolcott, H. (1990). On seeking—and rejecting—validity in qualitative research. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121-152). New York: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

MMR-article-ppv for $36.00