A third way of conceptualizing mixed methods research is proposed, one based on critical interpretive methodologies.

Berman, A. (2011, February 7). Obama: Triangulation 2.0? The Nation, pp. 22-26.
Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 269-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (2010). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Editorial: Introductions to Parts 3 and 5. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 243-250, pp. 563-568). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Ellingson, L. L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ellingson, L. L. (2011). Analysis and representation across the continuum. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 595-610). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Fielding, N. G. (2009). Going out on a limb: Postmodernism and multiple method research. Current Sociology, 3, 427-447.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Flick, U. (2007). Designing qualitative research. London, England: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gage, N. L. (1989). The paradigm wars and their aftermath: A “historical” sketch of research and teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher, 18(7), 4-10.
Google Scholar | Abstract
Giddens, A. (2000). The third way and its critics. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Guba, E. G. (1990a). The alternative paradigm dialog. In Guba, E. G. (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-30). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Guba, E. G. (1990b). Carrying on the dialog. In Guba, E. G. (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 368-378). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Guba, E., Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, and emerging confluences. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with method. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, S. N., Leavy, P. (2008). Introduction: Pushing on the methodological boundaries: The growing need for emergent methods within and across the disciplines. In Hesse-Biber, S. N., Leavy, P. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 1-15). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Howe, K. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17, 10-16.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Howe, K. R. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 42-61.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kincheloe, J. L. (2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 679-692.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Lather, P. 2007. Getting Lost: Feminist Efforts toward a Double(d) Science. Albany: SUNY Press.
Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S. (2010). What a long, strange trip it’s been . . . 25 years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 3-9.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Maxcy, S. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social science: The search for multiple models of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 51-90). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Mertens, D. M. (2011). Mixed methods as tools for social change. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5, 195-197. doi:10.1177/158689811451809510.1177/1586898114518095
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Morse, J. M. (2011). What is qualitative health research? In Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 401-414). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Morse, J. M., Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Google Scholar
Plano Clark, V. L., Creswell, J. W. (2008). Introduction. In Plano Clark, V. L., Creswell, J. W. (Eds.), The mixed methods reader (pp. xv-xviii). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Plano Clark, V. L., Creswell, J. W., O’Neil Green, D., Shope, R. J. (2008). Mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches: An introduction to emergent mixed methods research. In Hesse-Biber, S. N., Leavy, P. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 363-387). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 923-948). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Scheurich, J. J., Clark, M. C. (2006). Qualitative studies in education at the beginning of the twenty-first century. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 401.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Schwandt, T. A. (2007). Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Smith, A. D. (2004). House arrest and piano. New York, NY: Anchor.
Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (2003a). Preface. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. ix-xv). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (2003b). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research: Contemporary issues in an emerging field. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 285-300). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
West, C. (1995). Theory, pragmatisms, and politics. In Hollinger, R., Depew, D. (Eds.), Pragmatism: From progressivism to postmodernism (pp. 314-326). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

MMR-article-ppv for $36.00