![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This article distinguishes a disjunctive conception of mixed methods/triangulation, which brings different methods to bear on different questions, from a conjunctive conception, which brings different methods to bear on the same question. It then examines a more inclusive, holistic conception of mixed methods/triangulation that accommodates ostensibly divergent findings by bringing them under a more comprehensive framework. Intertwined with this analysis, the article distinguishes mechanical from agential causation. Mechanical causation accounts for ordered processes of human behavior on the model of the natural sciences; agential causation accounts for ordered processes of human behavior in terms of norm-governed institutions and practices. The article concludes that there are no barriers to triangulating qualitative and quantitative methods (disjunctively or conjunctively) with respect to either mechanical or agential causation, taken separately. However, it also concludes that more comprehensive, “holistic” causal explanation that combines mechanical and agential causation, for example, explaining defiant behavior by appeal to lead poisoning, is discontinuous.
References
|
American Educational Research Association . (2008). Definition of scientifically-based research. Retrieved from http://aera.net/Default.aspx?id=6790 Google Scholar | |
|
Anderson, E. (2010). The imperative of integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Class size. (2011, July 1). Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/class-size/ Google Scholar | |
|
Cronbach, L. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116-127. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
CSR Research Consortium . (n.d.). Class size reduction in California: The 1998-99 evaluation findings. Retrieved from http://www.classize.org/summary/98-99/ Google Scholar | |
|
Dennett, D. (1987). True believers. In Dennett, D. (Ed.), The intentional stance (pp. 13-35). Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar | |
|
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
House, E. (1991). Realism in research. Educational Researcher, 20(6), 2-25. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Howe, K. (1985). Two dogmas of educational research. Educational Researcher, 14(8), 10-18. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Howe, K. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis (or dogmas die hard). Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10-16. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Howe, K. (2003). Closing methodological divides: Toward democratic educational research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar | |
|
Howe, K. (2004). A critique of experimentalism. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(4), 42-61. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Howe, K. (2009). Positivist dogmas, rhetoric, and the education science question. Educational Researcher, 38, 428-440. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Howe, K. (2011). Mixed methods, mixed causes? Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 166-171. doi:10.1177/107780041039252 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17, 13-17. doi:10.3102/0013189X01700201310.3102/0013189X017002013 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Moses, M., Farley, A., Gaertner, M., Paguyo, C., Jackson, D., Howe, K. (2010). Investigating the defeat of Colorado’s Amendment 46. New York, NY: Public Interest Projects. Google Scholar | |
|
National Research Council . (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Google Scholar | |
|
National Research Council . (2004). Advancing scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Searle, J. (1984). Minds, brains and science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Smith, J. K., Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conversation: The end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational researchers. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-12. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
