![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
In spite of recent methodological developments related to quality assurance in mixed methods research, practical examples of how to implement quality criteria in designing and conducting sequential QUAN → QUAL mixed methods studies to ensure the process is systematic and rigorous remain scarce. This article discusses a three-step procedure for securing the quality of the meta-inferences generated from sequential employment of quantitative and qualitative methods and offers several validation strategies specific to a sequential QUAN → QUAL mixed methods design: applying a systematic process for selecting participants for qualitative follow-up, elaborating on unexpected quantitative results, and observing interaction between qualitative and quantitative study strands. The discussed procedures are illustrated using a mixed methods study of graduate student engagement in learning applied research methods online.
Keywords mixed methods research, sequential design, validity, inferences
References
Section:
|
Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 133-136. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Beaudoin, M. F. (Ed.). (2006). Perspectives on higher education in the digital age. New York, NY: Nova Science. Google Scholar | |
|
Bryman, A., Becker, S., Semptik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 261-276. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 45-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Google Scholar | |
|
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Garrett, A. (2008). Methodological issues in conducting mixed methods research designs. In Bergman, M. M. (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications (pp. 66-83). London, England: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Dellinger, A. B., Leech, N. L. (2007). Toward a unified validation framework in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 309-332. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Glaser, B., Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine. Google Scholar | |
|
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. (Eds.). (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse programs (New Directions for Evaluation, Vol. 74). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
Hofmann, D. W. (2002). Internet-based distance learning in higher education. Tech Directions, 62(1), 28-32. Google Scholar | |
|
Ivankova, N. V. (2010). Teaching and learning mixed methods research in computer-mediated environment: Educational gains and challenges. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(1), 49-65. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., Stick, S. (2006). Using mixed methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ivankova, N., Kawamura, Y. (2010). Emerging trends in the utilization of integrated designs in social, behavioral, and health sciences. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 581-611). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ivankova, N., Stick, S. (2007). Online higher education programs: New challenges, new frontiers, new learning, and new scholarship. In Wright, D., Miller, M. (Eds.), Training higher education policy makers and leaders: A graduate program perspective (pp. 75-96). Charlotte, NC: Information Age. Google Scholar | |
|
Kember, D. (1995). Open learning courses for adults: A model of student progress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology. Google Scholar | |
|
Leech, N. L., Dellinger, A. B., Brannagan, K. B., Tanaka, H. (2010). Evaluating mixed research studies: A mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 17-31. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Maxwell, J. A., Mittapalli, K. (2010). Realism as a stance for mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 145-167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Morse, J. M., Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar | |
|
O’Cathain, A. (2010). Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: Toward a comprehensive framework. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in the social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 531-555). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63. Google Scholar | |
|
Papadimitriou, A., Ivankova, N., Hurtado, S. (in press). Addressing challenges of conducting quality mixed methods studies in higher education. In: Huisman, J., Tight, M. (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research. Bingley, England: Emerald Group. Google Scholar | |
|
Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Plano Clark, V., Badiee, M. (2010). Research questions in mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 275-304). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Tashakkori, A., Creswell, J. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-8. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 1-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Thorndike, R. M., Thorndike-Christ, T. N. (2011). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar |
