Organizational communication processes are complex, but all too often, researchers oversimplify the study of these processes by relying on a single method. Particularly when scholars and practitioners partner together to solve organizational problems, meaningful results require methodological flexibility and diversity. As an exemplar of the fit between mixed methods research and engaged scholarship, the present project used surveys, observations, and interviews to study the process of dissent in two organizations. Results emphasized that each organization’s mission was a key factor in how employees expressed disagreement and how others responded. Emergent research questions and sequential data collection revealed insights that would have been missed in single method studies and provided more complete insights for the nonacademic practitioners involved in the study.

Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2011). Advancing practice relevant scholarship. In Cassell, C., Lee, B. (Eds.), Challenges and controversies in management research (pp. 314-331). New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Avtgis, T. A., Thomas-Maddox, C., Taylor, E., Patterson, B. R. (2007). The influence of employee burnout syndrome on the expression of organizational dissent. Communication Research Reports, 24, 97-102.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Barge, J. K., Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2008). Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 251-265.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Biesta, G. (2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavior research (2nd ed., pp. 95-118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brown, W. A., Yoshioka, C. F. (2003). Mission attachment and satisfaction as factors in employee retention. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14, 5-18.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bryman, A., Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Canary, D. J., Spitzberg, B. H. (1987). Appropriateness and effectiveness perceptions of conflict strategies. Human Communication Research, 14, 93-118.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Castro, F. G., Kellison, J. G., Boyd, S. J., Kopak, A. (2010). A methodology for conducting integrative mixed methods research and data analyses. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 342-360.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Christ, T. W. (2007). A recursive approach to mixed methods research in a longitudinal study of postsecondary education disability support services. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 226-241.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W., West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191-1201.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Edmondson, V. C., Munchus, G. (2007). Managing the unwanted truth: A framework for dissent strategy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 747-760.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Eschenfelder, B. (2011). Lessons about engaged communication scholarship: I heard it through the grapevine. Florida Communication Journal, 39, 37-54.
Google Scholar
Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Garner, J. T. (2009). When things go wrong at work: An exploration of organizational dissent messages. Communication Studies, 60, 197-218.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Garner, J. T. (2012). Making waves at work: Perceived effectiveness and appropriateness of organizational dissent messages. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 224-241.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Garner, J. T. (in press). Open Doors and Iron Cages: Management Responses to Employee Dissent. Journal of Business Communication.
Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Graham, J. W. (1986). Principled organizational dissent: A theoretical essay. In Staw, B. M., Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 8, pp. 1-52). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Google Scholar
Gulati, R. (2007). Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 775-782.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hegstrom, T. G. (1999). Reasons for “rocking the boat”: Principles and personal problems. In Geissner, H. K., Herbig, A. F., Wessela, E. (Eds.), Business communication in Europe (pp. 179-194). Tostedt, Germany: Attikon Verlag.
Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, S., Johnson, R. B. (2013). Coming at things differently: Future directions of possible engagement with mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 103-109.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Jehn, K. A., Jonsen, K. (2010). A multimethod approach to the study of sensitive organizational issues. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 313-341.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-26.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Kassing, J. W. (2005). Speaking up competently: A comparison of perceived competence in upward dissent strategies. Communication Research Reports, 22, 227-234.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kassing, J. W. (2007). Going around the boss: Exploring the consequences of circumvention. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 55-74.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kassing, J. W. (2011). Dissent in organizations. Cambridge, England: Polity.
Google Scholar
Korsgaard, M. A., Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657-669.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Landier, A., Sraer, D., Thesmar, D. (2009). Optimal dissent in organizations. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 761-794.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lutgen-Sandvik, P., Riforgiate, S., Fletcher, C. (2011). Work as a source of positive emotional experiences and the discourses informing positive assessment. Western Journal of Communication, 75, 2-27.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Markides, C. (2007). In search of ambidextrous professors. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 762-768.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McGahan, A. M. (2007). Academic research that matters to managers: On zebras, dogs, lemmings, hammers, and turnips. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 748-753.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1453-1476.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mitchell, R., Nicholas, S., Boyle, B. (2009). The role of openness to cognitive diversity and group processes in knowledge creation. Small Group Research, 40, 535-554.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2011). The use and added value of mixed methods in management research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(1), 7-24.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Morse, J. M. (2010). Procedures and practice of mixed method design: Maintaining control, rigor, and complexity. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavior research (2nd ed., pp. 339-352). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Myers, K. (2010). Mixed methods. In Miller, V. D., Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., and Associates, Advancing research in organizational communication through quantitative methodology , Management Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 4-58.
Google Scholar
Plano Clark, V. L., Badiee, M. (2010). Research questions in mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavior research (2nd ed., pp. 275-304). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-220). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Saunders, M. N. K. (2011). The management researcher as practitioner: Issues from the interface. In Cassell, C., Lee, B. (Eds.), Challenges and controversies in management research (pp. 243-257). New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080-1093.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Simpson, J. L., Seibold, D. R. (2008). Practical engagements and co-created research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 266-280.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Spencer, D. G. (1986). Employee voice and employee retention. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 488-502.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Suddaby, R. (2006). From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 633-642.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (Applied Social Research Methods Series, No. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavior research (2nd ed., pp. 1-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Teo, H., Caspersz, D. (2011). Dissenting discourse: Exploring alternatives to the whistleblowing/silence dichotomy. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 237-249.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tushman, M., O’Reilly, C. (2007). Research and relevance: Implications of Pasteur’s quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 769-774.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Van de Ven, A. H., Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31, 802-821.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Waldron, V. R. (2007). Public scholarship, relational practice: A reflection on “virtuous” partnerships. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 118-125.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wensley, R. (2011). Seeking relevance in management research. In Cassell, C., Lee, B. (Eds.), Challenges and controversies in management research (pp. 258-274). New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Yin, R. (2006, April). Mixed methods research: Are methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

MMR-article-ppv for $36.00