This research, based on a case study of vulnerable children in Korea, used a mixed methods transformative approach to explore strategies to support and help disadvantaged children. The methodological approach includes three phases: a mixed methods contextual analysis, a qualitative dominant analysis based on Sen’s capability approach and critical communicative methodology to identify relevant value systems that support and impede resilience, and an action research approach to develop and implement the interventions. The adoption of mixed methods extends understandings of how to design, implement, and evaluate programs for vulnerable children.

Alexiu, T. M., Sorde, T. (2011). How to turn difficulties into opportunities: Drawing from diversity to promote social cohesion. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21(1), 49-62.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bray, M., Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
Google Scholar
Gomez, A., Puigvert, L., Flecha, R. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 235-245.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hope, K. W., Waterman, H. A. (2003). Praiseworthy pragmatism? Validity and action research. Methodological Issues in Nursing Research, 44, 120-127.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Jang, S. M. (2005). Economical benefits analysis on the rankings of the universities. Korea Education, 33, 75-107.
Google Scholar
Kim, D. I. (2004). Definition and scope of poverty. Prospects and challenges of protection policy for underclass (Research Report 2004-01). Seoul, Korea: Korea Development Institute.
Google Scholar
Korea Ministry of Health & Welfare, & Headquarters of Community Child Center . (2011). Status report of Community Child Center in Korea (Research Report No. 12-03). Sejong, Korea: Author.
Google Scholar
Lombardi, D., Woods, N. (2007, February). The political economy of IMF surveillance (Working Paper No. 17). Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Google Scholar
Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Mertens, D. M. (2012). Transformative mixed methods: Addressing inequalities. American Behavioral Scientists, 56, 802-813.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Puigvert, L., Christou, M., Holford, J. (2012). Critical communicative methodology: Including vulnerable voices in research through dialogue. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42, 512-526.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rhu, B. L., Kim, S. S. (2006). Educational gap: Impact factor analysis of family backgrounds and schooling (Research Report No. 2006-02). Seoul, Korea: Korea Educational Development Institute.
Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 351-376.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum, M., Sen, A. (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30-53). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sen, A. (2005) Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 6, 151-166.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Valencia, R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Abingdon, England: Routledge Falmer Press.
Google Scholar
Worapot, M. (2002). The ASEAN surveillance process and the East Asian monetary fund. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 19, 111-122.
Google Scholar | Crossref
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

MMR-article-ppv for $36.00