In 2007, a 4-year longitudinal study of all people admitted to the two New Zealand spinal units commenced. It aims to (a) explore interrelationship(s) of body, self, and society for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) and (b) investigate how entitlement to rehabilitation and compensation through New Zealand’s Accident Compensation Corporation affects socioeconomic and health outcomes. Working within the emancipatory-transformative research paradigm, an underlying aim was to build research capacity among people with SCI by recruiting them onto the research team (in addition to the principal investigator who has a SCI). The primary focus of this article is not on the findings of the study but on building research capacity in the SCI population of New Zealand, which emerged from our commitment to the study being ethical and emancipatory. This will involve a consideration of what constitutes ethical disability research, the research paradigm chosen, assembling the research team, and the flexibility provided by the use of mixed methods to achieve these ends.

Barnes, C., Mercer, G. (Eds.). (1997). Doing disability research. Leeds, England: Disability Press.
Google Scholar
Barnes, C., Mercer, G. (Eds.). (2004). Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and practice. Leeds, England: Disability Press.
Google Scholar
Bourke, J. (2012). The experience of rehabilitation from the perspectives of individuals in New Zealand with tetraplegia due to traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Google Scholar
Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Curry, L., O’Cathain, L., Plano Clark, V., Aroni, R., Fetters, M., Berg, D. (2012). The role of group dynamics in mixed methods health sciences research teams. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 5-20.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Derrett, S., Beaver, C., Sullivan, M., Herbison, P., Acland, R., Paul, C. (2012). Traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord impairment in New Zealand: Incidence and characteristics of people admitted to spinal clinics. Injury Prevention, 18, 343-346. doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040266
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Derrett, S., Colhoun, S. (2011). Being a quantitative interviewer: Qualitatively exploring interviewers’ experiences in a longitudinal cohort study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 165. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-165
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gill, C. J., Kewman, D. G., Brannon, R. W. (2003). Transforming psychological practice and society. American Psychologist, 58, 305-312.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gómez, A., Puigvert, L., Flecha, R. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 235-245.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Goodley, D. (2001). “Learning difficulties,” the social model of disability and impairment: Challenging epistemologies. Disability & Society, 16, 207-231.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hemmings, A., Beckett, G., Kennerly, S., Yap, T. (2013). Building a community of research practice: Intragroup team social dynamics in interdisciplinary mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 261-273.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hunt, P. (1981). Settling accounts with the parasite people. Disability Challenge, 1, 37-48. Retrieved from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/UPIAS-Disability-Challenge1.pdf
Google Scholar
Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212-225.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mertens, D. M. (2011). Mixed methods as tools for social change. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(3), 195-197.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mertens, D. M., Sullivan, M., Stace, H. (2010). Disability communities. Transformative research for social justice. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 227-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production. Disability & Society, 7, 101-114.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Paul, C., Derrett, S., McAllister, S., Herbison, P., Beaver, C., Sullivan, M. (2013). Socioeconomic outcomes following spinal cord injury and the role of no-fault compensation: Longitudinal study. Spinal Cord, 51, 919-925. doi:10.1038/sc.2013.110
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Sullivan, M. (1997). Paraplegic bodies: Self and society (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. (2009). Philosophy, ethics and the disability community. In Mertens, D. M., Ginsberg, P. E. (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 69-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sullivan, M., Paul, C., Herbison, G., Tamou, P., Derrett, S., Crawford, M. (2010). A longitudinal study of the life histories of people with spinal cord injury. Injury Prevention, 16(6), e3.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
van den Heuvel, M. (2012). Lived experience of managing paid personal care following a spinal cord injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

MMR-article-ppv for $36.00