Deaf people, members of a complex global language minority, have been excluded from positions of power in the field of humanitarian aid and development assistance, as well as from playing a significant role in the conduct of research that affects their lives. Deaf people rarely lead or participate as researchers in studies about their own communities or about the assistance they receive. Transformative mixed methods research strategies focus on the development of culturally respectful relationships to enhance collaboration between members of dominant and marginalized communities in order to improve the accuracy and usefulness of the findings. In this article, the application of transformative mixed methods in the deaf community provides examples of how research reveals complex realities and how researchers employ mixed methods strategies to appropriately engage members of marginalized communities in the context of development assistance to support human rights.

American Association of Persons with Disabilities . (2013). What powers us. Retrieved from http://www.aapd.com/what-powers-us/disability-rights/
Google Scholar
Barnes, C. (2004). Reflections on doing emancipatory disability research. In Swain, J., French, S., Barnes, C., Thomas, C. (Eds.), Disabling barriers, enabling environments (2nd ed., pp. 47-53). London, England: Sage.
Google Scholar
Barnes, C. (2012). The social model of disability: Valuable or irrelevant? In Watson, N. R., Thomas, C. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 12-29). London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Bowling, A. (1997). Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. London, England: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Chambers, R. (2002). Participatory workshops: A sourcebook of 21 sets of ideas and activities. New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Creswell, J., Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Davis, L. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. London, England: Verso.
Google Scholar
Harris, A., Enfield, S. (2003). Disability, equality and human rights: A training manual for development and humanitarian organisations. Oxford, England: Oxfam GB.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Haualand, H., Allen, C. (2009). Deaf people and human rights. Helsinki, Finland: World Federation of the Deaf and Swedish National Association of the Deaf.
Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, S. (2011). The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (n.d.). The definition of disability. Retrieved from http://www.accessiblesociety.org/topics/demographics-identity/dkaplanpaper.htm
Google Scholar
Ladd, P. (2003). Understanding deaf culture: In search of deafhood. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lane, H. (2005). Ethnicity, ethics, and the deaf-world. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 291-310.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Lee, K. (2009). The importance of culture in evaluation: A practical guide for evaluators. Denver: Colorado Trust.
Google Scholar
Lord, J., Guernsey, K., Balfe, J., Kerr, V., Flowers, N. (2007). Human Rights Yes! Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Human Rights Resource Center.
Google Scholar
Lord, J., Stein, M. (2009). Monitoring the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Innovations, lost opportunities, and future potential (Paper 1101). William and Mary Law School Scholarship Repository (Faculty Publications). Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1101
Google Scholar
McKee, M., Thew, D., Starr, M., Kushalnagar, P., Graybill, P., Reid, J., . . . Pearson, T. (2012). Engaging the deaf American sign language community: Lessons from a community based resource center. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6, 321-329.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Mertens, D. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212-225.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mertens, D. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford.
Google Scholar
Mertens, D. (2013). Emerging advances in mixed methods addressing social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(3), 215-218.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mertens, D., Wilson, A. (2012). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
Google Scholar
Metts, R. (2000, February). Disability issues, trends and recommendations for the World Bank (Social Protection Working Paper No. 0007). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar
Miles, M. (2002). Some influences of religion on attitudes toward disabilities and people with disabilities. Journal of Religion, Disability, & Health, 6, 117-129.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Miles, M. (2007). Disability and deafness, in the context of religion, spirituality, belief and morality, in Middle Eastern, South Asian and East Asian histories and cultures: Annotated bibliography. Retrieved from http://www.independentliving.org/docs7/miles200707.html
Google Scholar
Mitra, S. (2005). Disability and social safety nets in developing countries (World Bank Other Operational Studies 11783). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar
Munyi, C. (2012). Past and present perceptions towards disability: A historical perspective. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(2). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3197/3068
Google Scholar
National Council on Disability . (2013). Toward the full inclusion of people with disabilities: Examining the accessibility of overseas facilities and programs funded by the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, 101-114.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Peters, S. (2003). Education for all: Including children with disabilities. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. (2009). Philosophy, ethics, and the disability community. In Mertens, D., Ginsberg, P. (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 69-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
United Nations Economic and Social Council . (2008). Mainstreaming disability in the development agenda: Note by the Secretariat. In Follow up to the World Summit for Social Development and the 24th special session of the General Assembly: Emerging Issues. New York, NY: United Nations Commission for Social Development.
Google Scholar
United Nations Enable . (2013). Development and human rights for all. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=23
Google Scholar
Wilson, A. (2005, Summer). The effectiveness of international development assistance from American organizations to deaf communities in Jamaica. American Annals of the Deaf, 150, 292-304.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Wilson, A., Kakiri, N.(2010). Best practice for collaborating with deaf communities in developing countries. In Napoli, D. J., Mathur, G. (Eds.), Around the deaf world in two days (It’s a small world): Sign languages, social issues/civil rights, creativity (pp. 271-286). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wilson, A., Winiarczyk, R., Johnson, C. (2012). World of solutions innovations for persons with disabilities: Evaluation of Project Sueñaletras. Washington, DC: InterAmerican Development Bank.
Google Scholar
World Federation of the Deaf . (2011). Deaf women and girls not able to enjoy basic human rights. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CRPD/DGD/2013_Submissions/20.WorldFederationDeaf.pdf
Google Scholar
World Federation of the Deaf . (2013a). About us. Retrieved from http://wfdeaf.org
Google Scholar
World Federation of the Deaf . (2013b). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
Google Scholar
World Health Organization . (2013, February). Deafness and hearing loss. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/index.html
Google Scholar
World Health Organization & World Bank . (2011). World report on disability. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

MMR-article-ppv for $36.00