Educational innovations often involve intact subgroups, such as school classes or university departments. In small-scale educational evaluation research, typically involving 1 to 20 subgroups, differences among these subgroups are often neglected. This article presents a mixed method from a qualitative perspective, in which differences among intact subgroups regarding one construct or effect are first quantitatively identified and subsequently qualitatively described and explained by differences among the contexts of the separate intact subgroups. Its focus on the contexts of intact subgroups, where organizational factors can be modified, makes this method interesting from a management perspective. In evaluations, repeated application of the method deserves a place beside other analytical methods.

Babbie, E. (2012). The practice of social research (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Google Scholar
Bamberger, M., Rao, V., Woolcock, M. (2010). Using mixed methods in monitoring and evaluation: Experiences from international development. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 613-641). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Becker, H. S. (1992). Cases, causes, conjunctures, stories, and imagery. In Ragin, C. C., Becker, H. S. (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 205-216). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research: It’s just regression! New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Collins, K. M. T. (2010). Advanced sampling designs in mixed research: Current practices and emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 353-377). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Games, P. A. (1976). Limitations of analysis of covariance on intact group quasi-experimental designs. Journal of Experimental Education, 44(4), 51-54.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Ivankova, N. V. (2013). Implementing quality criteria in designing and conducting a sequential QUAN → QUAL mixed methods study of student engagement with learning applied research methods online. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(1), 25-51. doi:10.1177/1558689813487945
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kaul Nastasi, B., Hitchcock, J. H., Brown, L. M. (2010). An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 305-338). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lincoln, Y. S. (2010). “What a long, strange trip it’s been . . .”: Twenty-five years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 3-9. doi:10.1177/1077800409349754
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 304-305. doi:10.1037/h0025105
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-301.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. A., Mittapalli, K. (2010). Realism as a stance for mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 145-167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
McNeil, K. A., Newman, I., Kelly, F. J. (1996). Testing research hypotheses with the general linear model. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
Google Scholar
Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189-208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Morse, J. M., Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Google Scholar
Murnane, R. J., Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Newman, D., Newman, I., Salzman, J. (2010). Comparing OLS and HLM models and the questions they answer: Potential concerns for type VI errors. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 36(1), 1-9.
Google Scholar
Newman, I., Fraas, J. W., Newman, C., Brown, R. (2002). Research practices that produce type VI errors. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 138-145.
Google Scholar
Norman, D. A. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
Google Scholar
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., Collins, K. M. T. (2011). Assessing legitimation in mixed research: A new framework. Quality & Quantity, 45, 1253-1271. doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9289-9
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pawson, R. (2008). Method mix, technical hex, theory fix. In Bergman, M. M. (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications (pp. 120-137). Thousand, Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Pawson, R., Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London, England: Sage.
Google Scholar
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Google Scholar
Sammons, P. (1996). Complexities in the judgement of school effectiveness. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 113-149. doi:10.1080/1380361960020201
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sammons, P. (2010). The contribution of mixed methods to recent research on educational effectiveness. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 697-723). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sandelowski, M. (2003). Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 321-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, England: Sage.
Google Scholar
Teddlie, C. B., Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Teddlie, C. B., Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 1-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
West, B., Welch, K. B., Galecki, A. T. (2007). Linear mixed models: A practical guide using statistical software. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

MMR-article-ppv for $36.00