For the past few decades, randomized clinical trials have provided evidence for effective treatments by comparing several competing therapies. Their successes have led to numerous new therapies to combat many diseases. However, since their conclusions are based on the entire cohort in the trial, the treatment recommendation is for everyone, and may not be the best option for an individual. Medical research is now focusing more on providing personalized care for patients, which requires investigating how patient characteristics, including novel biomarkers, modify the effect of current treatment modalities. This is known as heterogeneity of treatment effects. A better understanding of the interaction between treatment and patient-specific prognostic factors will enable practitioners to expand the availability of tailored therapies, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes. The Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) approach was developed to allow researchers to investigate the heterogeneity of treatment effects on survival outcomes across values of a (continuously measured) covariate, such as a biomarker measurement.

Here, we extend the Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot approach to continuous, binary, and count outcomes, which can be easily modeled using generalized linear models. With this extension of Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot, these additional types of treatment effects within subpopulations defined with respect to a covariate of interest can be estimated, and the statistical significance of any observed heterogeneity of treatment effect can be assessed using permutation tests. The desirable feature that commonly used models are applied to well-defined patient subgroups to estimate treatment effects is retained in this extension.

We describe a simulation study to confirm that the proper Type I error rate is maintained when there is no treatment heterogeneity, and a power study to show that the statistics have power to detect treatment heterogeneity under alternative scenarios. As an illustration, we apply the methods to data from the Aspirin/Folate Polyp Prevention Study, a clinical trial evaluating the effect of oral aspirin, folic acid, or both as a chemoprevention agent against colorectal adenomas. The pre-existing R software package stepp has been extended to handle continuous, binary, and count data using Gaussian, Bernoulli, and Poisson models, and it is available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network.

The extension of the method and the availability of new software now permit STEPP to be applied to the full range of clinical trial end points.

1. Lagakos, SW . The challenge of subgroup analysis—reporting without distorting. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 16671669.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
2. Wang, R, Lagakos, SW, Ware, JH. Statistics in medicine—reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 21892194.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
3. Cox, DR . Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1972; 34: 187220.
Google Scholar | ISI
4. Fine, J, Gray, R. A proportional hazards model for the sub distribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 94: 496509.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
5. Gray, R . A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1998; 16: 11411154.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
6. Bonetti, M, Gelber, RD. A graphical method to assess treatment-covariate interactions using the Cox model on subsets of the data. Stat Med 2000; 19: 25952609.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
7. Bonetti, M, Gelber, RD. Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials. Biostatistics 2004; 53: 465481.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
8. Bonetti, M, Zahrieh, D, Cole, D. A small sample study of the STEPP approach to assessing treatment-covariate interactions in survival data. Stat Med 2009; 28: 12551268.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
9. Lazar, A, Cole, B, Bonetti, M. Evaluation of treatment-effect heterogeneity using biomarkers measured on a continuous scale: subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 45394544.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
10. Viale, G, Giobbie-Hurder, A, Regan, MM. Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed Ki-67 labeling index in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: results from breast international group trial 1-98 comparing adjuvant tamoxifen with letrozole. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 55695575.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
11. Colleoni, M, Litman, HJ, Castiglione-Gertsch, M. Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a joint analysis of two randomized trials investigating three versus six course of CMF. Br J Cancer 2002; 86: 17051714.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
12. Baron, JA, Cole, BF, Sandler, RS. A randomized trial of aspirin to prevent colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 891899.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
13. R: a language and environment for statistical computing . Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008, http://CRAN.R-project.org
Google Scholar
14. Yip, WK . Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP): R package version 2.3-2, 2011, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stepp
Google Scholar
15. Potthoff, RF, Peterson, BL, George, SL. Detecting treatment-by-centre interaction in multi-centre clinical trials. Stat Med 2001; 20: 193213.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
16. Pesarin, F . Multivariate permutation tests: with application in biostatistics. 1st ed. New York: Wiley, 2001.
Google Scholar
17. Lazar, AA, Bonetti, M, Cole, BF. Identifying treatment effect heterogeneity in clinical trials using subpopulations of events: STEPP. Clin Trials 2016; 13: 169179.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
18. Royston, P, Sauerbrei, W. A new approach to modeling interaction between treatment and continuous covariates in clinical trials by using fractional polynomials. Stat Med 2004; 23: 25092525.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
19. Simon, R . Bayesian subset analysis: application to studying treatment-by-gender interactions. Stat Med 2002; 21: 290929016.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
20. Foster, JC, Taylor, JMG, Rubert, SJ. Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data. Stat Med 2011; 30: 28672880.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
21. Pogue-Geile, KL, Kim, C, Jeong, JH. Predicting degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in NSABP trial B-31. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013; 105: 17821788.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

CTJ-article-ppv for $41.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $529.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top