Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online July 13, 2019

University of Pennsylvania 11th annual conference on statistical issues in clinical trials: Estimands, missing data and sensitivity analysis (morning panel session)

First page of PDF

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Guidance for Industry E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Geneva: ICH, 1998.
2. National Research Council. The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials. Panel on handling missing data in clinical trials. committee on national statistics, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.
3. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. ICH Harmonised Guideline. Estimands and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials, http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E9/E9-R1EWG_Step2_Guideline_2017_0616.pdf (2017; accessed 6 March 2019).
4. Rockhold FW, Ruberg SJ. ICH-E9 reflections and considerations. Pharm Stat 2008; 7(4): 233–235.
5. CONSORT. Transparent reporting of trials. http://www.consort-statement.org/ (2010; accessed 17 October 2018).
6. Tamblyn R, Eguale T, Huang A, et al. The incidence and determinants of primary nonadherence with prescribed medication in primary care: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160(7): 441–450.
7. Span P. The clinical trial is open, the elderly need not apply health. The New York Times, 13 April 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/13/health/elderly-clinical-trials.html
8. Mosteller F, Tukey JW. Data analysis, including statistics. In: Jonas LV (ed.) The collected works of John W. Tukey: philosophy and principles of data analysis 1965–1986, Vol. IV. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1987, pp. 601–720.
9. Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In: Bemmel J, McCray AT (eds) Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: patient-centered systems. Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 2000, pp. 65–70.
10. Permutt T, Li F. Trimmed means for symptom trials with dropouts. Pharm Stat 2017; 16(1): 20–28.
11. Alonso A, Van der Elst W, Molenberghs G, et al. On the relationship between the causal-inference and meta-analytic paradigms for the validation of surrogate endpoints. Biometrics 2015; 71(1): 15–24.
12. Oxford English Dictionary. http://www.oed.com/ (2019; accessed 9 January 2019).
13. Fisher RA. The design of experiments. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1951, p. 26.
14. Armitage P. Fisher, Bradford Hill, and randomization. Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32(6): 925–948; discussion 945.
15. Molenberghs G. Incomplete data in clinical studies: analysis, sensitivity, and sensitivity analysis. Drug Inf J 2009; 43(4): 409–429.
16. Lehmann EL, Casella G. Theory of point estimation. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: July 13, 2019
Issue published: August 2019

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2019.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 31303021

Authors

Affiliations

Frank W Rockhold
Jay P Siegel
Geert Molenberghs
Universiteit Hasselt and KU Leuven

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Clinical Trials.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 335

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 3 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 4

  1. Innovative Designs and Analyses for Small Population Clinical Trials
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Application of hypothetical strategies in acute pain
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Application of estimand framework in ICH E9 (R1) to safety evaluation
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. A Framework for Safety Evaluation Throughout the Product Development Life-Cycle
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

SCT members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

SCT members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text