School-to-school collaboration has been central to many improvement efforts over recent decades. In an attempt to promote both improvement and equity current developments in England have included changing formal governance arrangements to promote collaboration for improvement through ‘federations’ and ‘chains’ of schools. However, federations and school chains remain a relatively under-explored area and there is a noticeable absence of research exploring the impact of such arrangements on student outcomes. This paper draws on a programme of research including the national evaluation of federations, the first quantitative study of the impact of federations on student outcomes and a longitudinal qualitative study of the development of federations to consider two key questions: What is a federation? And do federations make a difference? In order to achieve this, the paper provides an overview of the key characteristics of federations and considers their contribution to improvement efforts. In conclusion the paper reflects on a number of issues and implications associated with developing a federated school system.

Ainscow, M, West, M (2006) Improving Urban Schools: Leadership and Collaboration. Buckingham: OU Press.
Google Scholar
Ainscow, M, Muijs, D, West, M (2006) Collaboration as a Strategy for Improving Schools in Challenging Circumstances, Improving Schools, 9(3): 192202.
Google Scholar | Abstract
Alter, C, Hage, J (1993) Organizations Working Together. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Atkinson, M, Springate, I, Johnson, F. (2007) Inter School Collaboration: A Literature Review. Slough: NFER.
Google Scholar
Benson, JK (1975) The inter-organisational network as political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 229249.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chapman, C, Muijs, D, MacAllister, J (2011) A Study of the Impact of Federation on Student Outcomes. Nottingham: National College.
Google Scholar
Chapman, C, Ainscow, M, Bragg, J. (2008) Emerging Patterns of School Leadership: Current Trends and Future Directions. Nottingham: NCSL.
Google Scholar
Chapman, C, Lindsay, G, Muijs, D. (2010) The federations policy: From partnership to integration for school improvement? School Effectiveness and Improvement 21(1): 5374.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chapman, C, Muijs, D, Sammons, P. (2009) A Quantitative Study of the Impact on Student Outcomes. Nottingham: NCSL.
Google Scholar
Confederation of British Industry (2010) Fulfilling Potential: The Role of Business in Education. London: CBI.
Google Scholar
DCSF (2009a) Standards site ‘What are federations?’ Available at: www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/federations/what_are_federations/?version=1 (accessed 21 July 2009).
Google Scholar
DCSF (2009b) How Hard Federations Can Help Your School. Nottingham: NCSL.
Google Scholar
DfE (2010) The Importance of Teaching: The Schools White Paper, Cm 7980. Norwich: The Stationery Office.
Google Scholar
DfE (2011) The Education Act 2011. London: HMSO.
Google Scholar
DfE (2012) Federations and trusts FAQs. Available at: www.education.gov.uk (accessed 12 March 2012).
Google Scholar
Douglas, M (1982) Introduction to grid/group analysis. In: Douglas, M (ed.) Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge/ Keegan Paul, pp.415.
Google Scholar
Emerson, RM (1962) Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review 27 ( 1 ): 3140.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Evans, J, Castle, F, Cooper, D. (2005) Collaboration: The big new idea for school improvement? Journal of Education Policy 20(2): 223 –235.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Evans, R (2009) Challenging the way we govern schools. The National Educational Trust. Available at: www.newschoolsnetwork.org (accessed 19 July 2010).
Google Scholar
Fielding, M (1999) Radical Collegiality: Affirming teaching as an inclusive professional practice, Australian Educational Researcher 26 ( 2 ): 134.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ford, G, McCue, E (2008) Can federations help stars to come out? exploring the unique contribution of federations to the development of school leaders. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D (2010) Creating a Self-Improving School System. Nottingham: National College.
Google Scholar
Harris Federation (2012) Available at: www.harrisfederation.org.uk (accessed 12 March 2012).
Google Scholar
Hill, R (2010) Chain reactions: A think piece on the development of chains of schools in the English schools system. Nottingham: National College.
Google Scholar
Hill, R (2012) The Missing Middle: The Case for School Commissioners: Developing a System of Great Schools in England. London: RSA.
Google Scholar
Himmelman, AT (1996) On theory and practice of transformational collaboration: From social science to social justice. In: Huxham, C (ed.) Creating Collaborative Advantage. London: Sage, pp.1943.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hood, C (1998) The Art of the State, Culture and Rhetoric and Public Management. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
Huxham, C, Vangen, S (2005) Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Levine, S, White, PE (1962) Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganisational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 5: 583601.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lindsay, G, Muijs, D, Harris, A. (2007) School Federations Pilot Study 2003–2007. London: TSO.
Google Scholar
Muijs, D (2008) Widening opportunities? A case study of school to school collaboration in a rural district. Improving Schools 11(1): 6173.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
NCSL (2011) Introduction to Models and Partnerships. Nottingham: NCSL.
Google Scholar
New Schools Network (2010) The Harris Federation. Available at: www.newschoolsnetwork.org (accessed 23 July 2010).
Google Scholar
NUT (no date) School federation and collaboration. Available at: www.teachers.org.uk (accessed 21 July 2010).
Google Scholar
NUT (2012) School organisation and reorganisation. Available at: www.teachers.org.uk/node/11285 (accessed 16 March 2012).
Google Scholar
Ofsted (2011) Leadership of More Than One School: An Evaluation of the Impact of Federated Schools. Manchester: Ofsted.
Google Scholar
Policy Exchange (2009) A Guide to School Choice Reforms. London: Policy Exchange.
Google Scholar
Smith, L (2011) A Review of the Impact on Governors and Leaders of Federations in the UK and Netherlands. Nottingham: National College.
Google Scholar
Sullivan, H, Skelcher, C (2002) Collaborating Across Boundaries. London: Palgrave.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stoker, G (1985) Regime theory in urban politics. In Judge, D, Stoker, G, Wolman, H (eds.). Theories of Urban Politics (pp. 5471). London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Todman, P, Harris, J, Carter, J. (2009) Better Together: Exploratory Case Studies of Formal Collaborations Between Small Rural Primary Schools. DCSF Research Brief.
Google Scholar
Williams, J (2008) United We Stand: A Soft Federation Model for Small Primary Schools. Nottingham: National College.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EMA-article-ppv for $36.00