![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
For three years from 2008 every school in England had a designated school improvement partner (SIP), portrayed as a critical friend, whose role was to support and challenge the headteacher. A mixed-methods study involving a national survey and face-to-face interviews evaluated the enactment of the national policy from the perspective of the direct recipients – the headteachers/school principals. Headteachers’ perceptions of their school improvement partners, and their experiences of the support and challenge provided by SIPs, varied. Much seemed to depend on individual SIP’s expertise and conduct. The SIPs’ prescribed agenda was seen as too focused on data rather than discussions about learning and teaching, and requirements for SIPs to report to the local authority and governors were in tension with trustful relationships with headteachers. The SIP programme could be interpreted as a commitment to the entitlement of headteachers to support and challenge, or as a mechanism for surveillance and discipline. Lessons are drawn for the ‘national’ and ‘local leaders of education’ who have replaced SIPs, and for anyone internationally concerned with support and challenge for school principals.
References
Section:
|
Ball, S (1990) Management as moral technology: a Luddite analysis. In: Ball, S (ed.) Foucault and Education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge, 153–164. Google Scholar | |
|
Barber, M (2007) Instruction to Deliver. London: Politico. Google Scholar | |
|
Berends, M (2006) Survey research. In: Green, J, Camili, G, Elmore, P (eds) Handbook of Complementary Methods in Educational Research. Upper Saddle Rover, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and American Educational Research Association, 632–640. Google Scholar | |
|
Blackie, J (1970) Inspecting and the Inspectorate. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Google Scholar | |
|
Bottery, M (2003) The management and mismanagement of trust. Educational Management & Administration 31(3): 245–261. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Costa, A, Kallick, B (1993) Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership 51(2): 49–51. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Cowen, G (2008) New Relationship with Schools: Evaluation Report. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families. Google Scholar | |
|
Derrington, C (2000) The LEA Contribution to School Improvement – A Role Worth Fighting For. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research. Google Scholar | |
|
Daloz, L (1986) Effective Teaching and Mentoring: Realizing the Transformational Potential of Adult Learning Experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
DfE (2010) The Importance of Teaching: The Schools White Paper 2010. Norwich: The Stationery Office. Google Scholar | |
|
DfEE (1999) Code of Practice on LEA-School Relations. London: Department for Education and Employment. Google Scholar | |
|
DfES (2004) A New Relationship with Schools. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills. Google Scholar | |
|
DfES (2005) A New Relationship with Schools: Next steps. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills. Google Scholar | |
|
DfES (2006) A New Relationship with Schools: The School Improvement Partner’s Brief, 2nd edn. London: Department for Education and Skills. Google Scholar | |
|
Earley, P, Fidler, B, Ouston, J (eds) (1996) Improvement Through Inspection? Complementary Approaches to School Development. London: David Fulton. Google Scholar | |
|
Field, A (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 3rd edn. London: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Foucault, M (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. Google Scholar | |
|
Halsey, K, Judkins, M, Atkinson, M, Rudd, P (2005) New Relationship with Schools: Evaluation of Trial Local Authorities and Schools. DfES Research Report 689. London: Department for Education and Skills. Google Scholar | |
|
Hayes, N (2000) Doing Psychological Research: Gathering and Analysing Data. Buckingham: Open University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hill, R, Matthews, P (2008) Schools Leading Schools: The power and potential of National Leaders of Education. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. Google Scholar | |
|
Hobson, A (2003) Mentoring and Coaching for New Leaders. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. Google Scholar | |
|
Holmes, D (2003) One-to-one leadership: Coaching in Schools. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. Google Scholar | |
|
House of Commons (Children, Schools and Families Committee) (2010a) School Accountability. First report of session 2009–10. Volume I. Report together with formal minutes. London: The Stationery Office. Google Scholar | |
|
House of Commons (Children, Schools and Families Committee) (2010b) School Accountability. First report of session 2009–10. Volume II. Oral and written evidence. London: The Stationery Office. Google Scholar | |
|
HM Treasury (2010) Spending Review 2010. Norwich: The Stationery Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Jardine, GM (2005) Foucault and Education. New York: Peter Lang. Google Scholar | |
|
Jennings, K, Lomas, L (2003) Implementing performance management for headteachers in English secondary schools. Educational Management & Administration 31(4): 369–383. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Kendall, G, Wickham, G (1999) Using Foucault’s Methods. London: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lord, P, Atkinson, M, Mitchell, H (2008) Mentoring and Coaching for Professionals: A Study of the Research Evidence. Slough: National Federation for Educational Research. Google Scholar | |
|
Luck, C (2003) It’s Good to Talk: An Enquiry into the Value of Mentoring as an Aspect of Professional Development for New Headteachers. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. Google Scholar | |
|
MacBeath, J (2006) School Inspection and Self-Evaluation: Working With the New Relationship. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
MacBeath, J (2008) Stories of compliance and subversion in a prescriptive policy environment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 36(1): 123–148. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Mansell, W (2007) Education by Numbers: The Tyranny of Testing. London: Politico’s. Google Scholar | |
|
Matthews, P, Sammons, P (2004) Improvement Through Inspection: An Evaluation of the Impact of Ofsted’s Work. London: Ofsted. Google Scholar | |
|
Muijs, D, Chapman, C, Gunter, H, West, M (2009) Questionnaire to headteachers in the North West of England, May 2007. In Chapman, C, Gunter, H (eds) Radical Reforms: Perspectives on an Era of Educational Change. Abingdon: Routledge, 209–218. Google Scholar | |
|
NCSL (2007) What We Know About School Leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. Google Scholar | |
|
Niesche, R (2011) Foucault and Educational Leadership: Disciplining the Principal. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ofsted (2010) The Annual Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills, 2009/10. Norwich: The Stationery Office. Google Scholar | |
|
O’Neill, O (2002a) A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
O’Neill, O (2002b) Called to account. (The Third 2002 Reith Lecture) Questions and Answers. BBC Radio 4 (17 April). Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/reith2002/lecture3.shtml (accessed 9 April 2012). Google Scholar | |
|
Perryman, J (2009) Inspection and the fabrication of professional and performative processes. Journal of Education Policy 24(5): 611–631. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Pont, B, Nusche, D, Hopkins, D (eds) (2008a) Improving School Leadership. Volume 2: Case Studies on System leadership. Paris: OECD. Google Scholar | |
|
Pont, B, Nusche, D, Moorman, H (2008b) Improving School Leadership. Volume 1: Policy and Practice. Paris: OECD. Google Scholar | |
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2007) Independent Study into School Leadership. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills. Google Scholar | |
|
Sanford, N (1966) Self and Society: Social Change and Individual Development. New York: Atherton. Google Scholar | |
|
Schein, E (1997) The concept of ‘client’ from a process consultation perspective: a guide for change agents. Journal of Organizational Change Management 10(2): 202–216. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Swaffield, S (2007) Light touch critical friendship. Improving Schools 10(3): 205–219. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
UNESCO (2008) Non-parametric measures of bivariate relationships. Available at www.unesco.org/webworld/idams/advguide/Chapt4_2.htm (accessed 10 July 2010). Google Scholar | |
|
Winter, R (1996) ‘Dilemma analysis’: a contribution to methodology for action research. Cambridge Journal of Education 12(3): 161–174. Google Scholar | Crossref |
