![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Incentivized collaboration, schools that receive incentives such as public funding or additional resources if they join a network, has become quite popular in Europe and North America (e.g. England, Flanders, United States). We used a comparative case study design to explore why schools would enter such an incentivized network and what role incentives play in the development, operation and sustaining of collaboration. Interviews and focus groups were conducted in eight Flemish (Belgium) school networks. Our analysis showed three key findings. Firstly, all schools entered a network because of the incentives instead of intrinsic motivations. Secondly, in half of the cases the initial negative motivations towards collaboration changed into positive motivations while collaborating. Thirdly, although incentives are useful when initiating a network, they are not sufficient to maintain a solid collaboration. We argue that an incentivized network reaches maturity when there is a common purpose, a degree of collaborative activity, mutual trust and solidarity. Therefore, an incentivized network needs a stable and non-competitive environment and sufficient leadership quality. We also believe that networks that are composed of schools with a common history, few members and small power differences have a better chance at survival.
References
Section:
|
Ainscow, M (2010) Achieving excellence and equity: reflections on the development of practices in one local district over 10 years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 75–92. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Chen, Bin (2010) Antecedents or processes? Determinants of perceived effectiveness of interorganizational collaborations for public service delivery. International Public Management Journal 13 (4): 381–407. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Chapman, C, Lindsay, G, Muijs, D. (2010) Governance, leadership, and management in federations of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 53–74. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Coleman, A (2011) Towards a blended model of leadership for school-based collaborations. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 39 (3): 296–316. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Connolly, M, James, C (2006) Collaboration for school improvement. A resource dependency and institutional framework of analysis. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 34 (1): 69–87. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Devos, G, Van Petegem, P, Delvaux, E. (2010) De evaluatie van scholengemeenschappen in het basis- en secundair onderwijs. Mechelen: Plantyn. Google Scholar | |
|
Dhillon, JK (2009) The role of social capital in sustaining partnership. British Educational Research Journal 35 (5): 687–704. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dickinson, H, Glasby, J (2010) Why partnership doesn’t work: Pitfalls, problems and possibilities in English health and social care. Public Management Review 12 (6): 811–828. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dowling, B, Powell, M, Glendinning, C (2004) Conceptualising successful partnerships. Health and Social Care in the Community 12 (4): 309–317. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Edelenbos, J, Klijn, E (2007) Trust in complex decision-making networks. A theoretical and empirical exploration. Administration & Society 39 (1): 25–50. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Eden, C, Huxham, C (2001) The negotiation of purpose in multi-organizational collaborative groups. Journal of Management studies 38 (3): 373–391. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Flemish Department of Education (1998) Decreet houdende diverse maatregelen met betrekking tot het secundair onderwijs en tot wijziging van het decreet van 25 februari 1997 betreffende het basisonderwijs. Available at: www.ond.vlaanderen.be/edulex/database/document/document.asp?docid=12982 (accessed 8 November 2012). Google Scholar | |
|
Fullan, M (2005) Leadership and Sustainability. System Thinkers in Action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Grafton, J, Abernethy, MA, Lillis, AM (2011) Organisational design choices in response to public sector reforms: A case study of mandated hospital networks. Management Accounting Research 22(4): 242–268. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hadfield, M, Chapman, C (2009) Leading School-based Networks. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hargreaves, A, Fink, D (2004) The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership 61 (7): 8–13. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Horwath, J, Morrison, T (2007) Collaboration, integration and change in children’s services: Critical issues and key ingredients. Child Abuse and Neglect 31 (1): 55–69. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Hudson, B, Hardy, B, Henwood, M. (1999) In pursuit of inter-agency collaboration in the public sector. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 1 (2): 235–260. Google Scholar | |
|
Huxham, C (2003) Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review 5 (3): 401–423. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Katz, S, Earl, L (2010) Learning about networked learning communities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 27–51. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Keast, R, Mandell, MP, Brown, K. (2004) Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review 64(3): 363–371. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kenis, P, Provan, KG (2009) Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration 87 (3): 440–456. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mandell, MP, Steelman, TA (2003) Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations. The importance of typologies, context and management strategies. Public Management Review 5 (2): 197–224. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Miles, B, Huberman, A (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Moore, TA, Rutherford, D (2012) Primary strategy learning networks: A local study of a national initiative. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 40 (1): 69–83. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Muijs, D, West, M, Ainscow, M (2010) Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 5–26. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Patton, MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Provan, KG, Fish, A, Sydow, J (2007) Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management 33 (3): 479–516. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Provan, KG, Lemaire, RH (2010) Core concepts and key ideas for understanding public sector organizational networks: Using research to inform scholarship and practice. Public Administration Review 72 (5): 638–648. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Provan, KG, Milward, HB (2001) Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61 (4): 414–423. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Scheerens, J, Luyten, H, van Raven, J (eds) (2011) Perspectives on educational quality. Illustrative Outcomes on Primary and Secondary Schooling in the Netherlands. Briefs, Springer. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Smith, AK, Wohlstetter, P (2001) Reform through school networks: A new kind of authority and accountability. Educational Policy 15 (4): 499–519. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sowa, JE (2008) Implementing interagency collaborations. Exploring variation in collaborative ventures in human service organizations. Administration and Society 40 (3): 298–323. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sowa, JE (2009) The collaboration decision in nonprofit organizations: View from the front line. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (6): 1003–1025. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sullivan, H, Skelcher, C (2002) Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Tett, L, Crowther, J, O’Hara, P (2003) Collaborative partnerships in community education. Journal of Education Policy 18 (1): 37–51. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Thomson, AM, Perry, JL (2006) Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review 6(S1): 20–32. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Van Raaij, DPAM (2006) Norms network members use. An alternative perspective for indicating network success or failure. International Public Management Journal 9(7): 249–270. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Veugelers, W, Zijlstra, H (2002) What goes on in a network? Some Dutch experiences. International Journal of Leadership in Education 5 (2): 163–174. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Weber, EP, Khademian, AM (2008) Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review 68 (2): 334–349. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
West, M (2010) School-to-school cooperation as a strategy for improving student outcomes in challenging contexts. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 93–112. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Winkler, I (2006) Network governance between individual and collective goals: Qualitative evidence from six networks. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 12 (3):119–134. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
