The Holistic Equilibrium Theory of Organizational Development was used to gain an in-depth understanding of the influence of holistic staff capacity on conducting effective internal whole-school evaluation (IWSE) within the Gauteng Department of Education’s public secondary schools. In the context of South African education, the staff of each public school are legally mandated to conduct an IWSE annually to self-determine their school development paths within a school improvement framework. This IWSE programme, however, takes a myopic unidimensional approach to whole school improvement, demanding public school staff, from diverse milieus with varying degrees of capacity, to take greater ownership of their own development needs through self-evaluative mechanisms. Using a concurrent triangulation mixed methods approach comprising a structured questionnaire, supported by focus group interviews, individual interviews with school principals and open-ended responses, this study elicited data on five distinct but integrated theoretical capacity dimensions: school evaluation, school improvement, collaborative cultures, professional learning communities and transformational leadership. The findings from both data collection strands corroborated the overarching conclusion that development of holistic capacities, transcending a technicist, bureaucratic approach, is more likely to result in the meaningful use of IWSE scaffolding school improvement.

Alise, MA, Teddlie, C (2010) A continuation of paradigm wars? Prevalence. rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioural sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4(2) 103: 103126 http://mmrsagepub.com/ (accessed 18 September 2014).
Google Scholar
Atkinson, P, Delamont, S (2008) Analytic perspectives. In: Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS (eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Bartle, P (2007) Handbook of Monitoring. Community Empowerment Collective. Available at: http://cec.vcn.bc.ca/cmp/modules/mon-int.htm (accessed 21 July 2015).
Google Scholar
Bisschoff, T, Mathye, A (2009) The advocacy of an appraisal system for teachers: A case study. South African Journal of Education 29(3): 393404.
Google Scholar | ISI
Blok, H, Sleegers, P, Karsten, S (2008) Looking for a balance between internal and external evaluation of school quality: Evaluation of the SVI model. Journal of Education Policy 23(4): 379395
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Boeije, H (2010) Analysis in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Bogdan, RC, Biklen, SK (2003) Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods, 4th edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Google Scholar
Boyne, G, Farrell, C, Law, J, Powell, M, Walker, RM (2003) Evaluating Public Management Reforms. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Boyne, GA, Law, J, Walker, RM (2004) Toward the self-evaluating school? An empirical test of the Widavsky model. Public Administration Review 64(4): 463473.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Brent, D (2003) Rethinking strategy and strategic leadership in schools: Developing the strategically focused school. American Educational Research Association Conference, Chicago, IL, April 2003.
Google Scholar
Brown, TA (2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Bubb, S, Earley, P (2009) Leading staff development for school improvement. School Leadership and Management 29(1): 2337.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cameron, KS, Quinn, RE (2006) Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Chen, Y (2003) Knowledge Management Proficiencies: The Key to Knowledge Management. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Collins, KMT (2010) Innovative data collection strategies in qualitative research. In Tashakkori, A, Teddlie, C (eds) Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Cowie, M, Taylor, D, Croxford, L (2007) Tough, intelligent accountability in Scottish secondary schools: A critical appraisal. Scottish Educational Review 39(1): 101130.
Google Scholar
Creswell, JW (2003) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 2nd edition. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Creswell, JW (2008) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 3rd edition. London: Pearson.
Google Scholar
Crouch, L (2004) South Africa equity and quality reforms: Possible lessons. Journal of Education for International Development 1(1): 118.
Google Scholar
Crowley, JJ, Hauser, AG (2007) Evaluating whole school improvement models: Creating meaningful and reasonable standards of review. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 12(1): 3055.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Davidsdottir, S, Lisi, P (2007) Effects of Debilitating Democracy on School Self-Evaluation. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
De Clercq, F (2008) Teacher quality, appraisal and development: The flaws of IQMS. Perspectives in Education 26(1): 718.
Google Scholar | ISI
De Grauwe, A, Naidoo, JP (2002) School Evaluation for Quality Improvement. Meeting of the Asian Network of Training and Research Institution in Educational Planning (ANTRIEP), Kuala Lumpur. Paris: UNESCO.
Google Scholar
De Grauwe, A (2004) School Self-Evaluation and External Inspection: A Complex Couple. International Institute for Educational Planning. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/iiep (accessed 20 November 2014).
Google Scholar
Denzin, NK (1978) The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw Hill.
Google Scholar
Department of Education (SA) (1995) White Paper on Education and Training Notice 196 of 1995. Cape Town: Department of Education. Available at: http://www.education.gov.za (accessed 17 October 2014)
Google Scholar
Department of Education (SA) (2001) National Policy on Whole-school Evaluation: Government Gazette 22512 of July 2001. Pretoria: Government Printers.
Google Scholar
DuFour, R, Marzano, RJ (2009) High-leverage strategies for principal leadership. Educational Leadership 66(5): 6268.
Google Scholar | ISI
Ehlers, UD, Schneckenberg, D (2010) Changing Cultures in Higher Education: Moving Ahead to Future Learning. Available at: http://linkspringer.com (accessed 11 November 2014).
Google Scholar
Feilzer, MY (2010) Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4(1): –16. Also available at: http://mmr.sagepub.com/content/4/1/6.full.pdf+html (accessed 21 July 2015).
Google Scholar
Feng, D (2008) Leadership strategies for learning improvement: Cases from mainland China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 24(3): 5063.
Google Scholar
Flanary, D (2009) Building leadership capacity: Be a better school leader by continuing your own professional development and encouraging others to do the same. Introduction to Educational Administration: Standards, Theories and Practices. Second Edition, 115129.
Google Scholar
Fleisch, B, Christie, P (2004) Structural change, leadership and school effectiveness/improvement: Perspectives from South Africa. Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 25(1): 95–112.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fullan, M (2001) Leading in a Culture Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Gil, L, Ross, SM (2004) The Past and Future of Comprehensive School Reform: Perspectives from a Researcher and Practitioner. Putting the Pieces Together. Comprehensive School Reform Researcher, 3(3): 151174.
Google Scholar
Glasman, N, Cibulka, J, Ashby, D (2002) Program self-evaluation for continuous improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly 38(2): 257288
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gorard, S, Tashakkori, A, Teddlie, C (2010) Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research, second edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishers.
Google Scholar
Greasley, P (2008) Quantitative Data Analysis Using SPSS. An Introduction for Health and Social Sciences. New York, NY: McGraw Hill–Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Greene, JC (2007) Mixed methods in social inquiry (Vol. 9). San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
Google Scholar
Greene, JC (2008) Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2(1): 722.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Grobler, BR (2006) Management of educator performance. In Loock, C, Grobler, B, Mestry, R Human Resource Management: Rebalancing the Scales. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 5987.
Google Scholar
Gruidl, J, Hustedde, R (2003) Evaluation of capacity-building programs: A learning organization approach. Journal of Extension 41(5): 130152
Google Scholar
Guest, G, MacQuuen, KM, Namey, EE (2012) Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hanson, WE, Creswell, JW, Plano Clark, VL, Petska, KS, Creswell, JD (2005) Mixed methods research designs in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology 52(2): 224250.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hargreaves, DH (2001) A capital theory of school effectiveness and improvement. British Educational Research Journal 27(4): 487503.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Harris, A, Lambert, L (2003) Building Leadership Capacity for School Improvement. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Harris, A, Day, C, Hopkins, D (2013) Effective Leadership for School Improvement. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hartas, D (Ed.) (2015) Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Google Scholar
Herbert, CT (2013) Theory-building in social sciences. Philosophy of Research 2(3): 221241.
Google Scholar
Jaffer, K (2010) School Inspection and Supervision in Pakistan: Approaches and Issues. Prospects 40(3): 375392. Pakistan: Institute for Educational Development, Aga Khan University.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Jang, EE, McDougall, DE, Pollon, D, Herbert, M, Russell, P (2008) Integrative mixed methods data analytic strategies in research on school success in challenging circumstances. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2(3): 221247.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Jansen, JD (2004) Autonomy and accountability in the regulation of the teaching profession: A South African case study. Research Papers in Education 19(1): 5166.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Johnson, B, Turner, LA (2003) Data Collection Strategies in Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Jones, K. (2004) A balanced school accountability model: an alternative to high-stakes testing. The Phi Delta Kappan, 85(8): 584600. http://www.jstor.org/satble/204416949 (accessed 18 September 2014).
Google Scholar
Karen, C (1998) School effectiveness and school improvement: Meanings and traditions. In: Buckingham, MR (ed.) Teacher Research and School Improvement: Opening the Doors from the Inside. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Kimbell, R, Stables, K (2007) Researching design learning: Issues and findings from two decades of research and development. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education 34(2): 80115.
Google Scholar
Kougioumtzis, K, Patriksson, G (2009) School-based teacher collaboration in Sweden and Greece: Formal co-operation, deprivatized practices and personalized interaction in primary and lower secondary schools. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 15(1): 131154.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kyriakides, L, Campbell, RJ (2004) School self-evaluation and school improvement: A critique of values and procedures. Studies in Educational Evaluation 30(4): 95115.
Google Scholar
Leech, NL, Dellinger, AB, Brannagan, KB, Tanaka, H (2010) Evaluating mixed research studies: mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 4(1): 1731.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Legotlo, MW, Maaga, MP, Sebego, MG (2002) Perceptions of stakeholders on causes of poor performance in Grade 12 in a province in South Africa. South African Journal of Education 22(2): 113118.
Google Scholar
Leithwood, K, Day, C, Sammons, P, Harris, A, Hopkins, D (2006) Seven Strong Claims About Successful School Leadership. London: Department for Education and Skills.
Google Scholar
Lesley, S (2000) Effective Schooling in Africa, Report 2: Key Issues Concerning Effectiveness and Improvement. Washington, DC: World Bank, Human Development Network.
Google Scholar
Liamputtong, P (2011) Focus Group Methodology: Principles and Practices. London: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
MacBeath, J (2008) Leadership for Learning: International Perspectives. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Google Scholar
Madhekeni, A (2012) Implementing results-based management systems in Zimbabwe: Context and implications for the public sector. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2(8): 122129.
Google Scholar
Maponya, PM (2005) Fostering the Culture of Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education. South African Journal of Higher Education 19(5): 900911.
Google Scholar
Mayne, J (2007) Challenges and lessons in implementing results-based management evaluation. Available at: http://evi.sagepub.com/ (accessed 02 October 2014).
Google Scholar
McLaughin, TH (2001) Four philosophical perspectives on school evaluation. Journal of Philosophy of Education 35(4): 647654
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mertens, DM, Bledsoe, KL, Sullivan, M, Wilson, A. In Tashakkori, A, Teddlie, C, (2010) Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research, second edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishers.
Google Scholar
Moynihan, DP (2006) Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Research in Organizational Behaviour 16(2): 309320.
Google Scholar
Murphy, J (2013) The architecture of school improvement. Journal of Educational Administration 51(3): 252263.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Neil, P, Johnston, J (2006) An approach to analysing professional discourse in a school self-evaluation project. Research in Education 73(2): 220240.
Google Scholar
Pallant, J (2007) SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Pedder, D, MacBeath, J (2008) Organizational learning approaches to school leadership and management: Teachers’ values and perceptions of practice. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 19(2): 207224.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Peng, WJ, Thomas, SM, Yang, X, Li, J (2006) Developing school evaluation methods to improve the quality of schooling in China: A pilot ‘value added’ study. Assessment in Education 13(2): 4560.
Google Scholar
Plano Clark, VL (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Plano Clark, VL, Vicki, L, Creswell, JW (2008): The mixed methods reader. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Plowright, D (2011) Using Mixed Methods Framework for an Integrated Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Plowright, D, Godfrey, R (2008) School self-evaluation: Can head teachers meet the new challenge. International Studies in Education Leadership 36(3): 3558.
Google Scholar
Rabiee, F (2004) Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63: 655660.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Ramaisa, B (2005) The role of the school district in the implementation of WSE (Unpublished MEd mini-dissertation. University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
Google Scholar
Richards, C (2001) School inspection: A re-appraisal. Journal of Philosophy of Education 35(4): 655665.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ritter, N (2010) Understanding a widely misunderstood statistic: Cronbach’s alpha. Paper presented at South western Educational Research Association (SERA) Conference 2010, New Orleans, LA (ED526237).
Google Scholar
Sandelowski, M (2000) Focus on research methods combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing and Health 3(2): 246255.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schildkamp, K, Visscher, A, Luyen, H (2009) The effects of the use of school self-evaluation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 20(1): 180205.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Senge, PM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
Google Scholar
Sergiovanni, TJ (2012) Strengthening the Heartbeat: Leading and Learning Together in School. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Sieber, JE (2009) In: Bickman L and Rog DJ (eds) The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Smith, WJ, Ngoma-Maema, WY (2003) Education for all in South Africa: Developing a national system for quality assurance. Comparative Education 39(3): 345365. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3593432 (accessed 15 October 2015).
Google Scholar
Stevens, JP (2012) Applied Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences, 5th edition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Steyn, GM (2007) The Changing Principalship in South African Schools. Pretoria: University of South Africa.
Google Scholar
Stufflebeam, DL, Madaus, GF, Kellaghan, T (2000) Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Education and Human Services. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Google Scholar
Stupak, RJ, Leitner, PM (eds) (2001) Handbook of Quality Public Management. New York, NY:
Google Scholar
Surgru, C (1999) Primary school principals’ perspectives on school evaluation: Implications for professional development. Irish Journal of Education 30(1): 6080. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30077463 (accessed 02 November 2014).
Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A, Teddlie, C (2010) Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research, second edition. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishers.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Taut, S (2007) Studying self-evaluation capacity building in a large international development organization. American Journal of Evaluation 25(3).
Google Scholar
UNDP (United Nations Development Program) (2009) Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation for Development Results. UNDP. New York: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Van Niekerk, EJ (2004) Whole-school Self-evaluation as Means to School Improvement. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of South Africa.
Google Scholar
Vanhoof, J, Van Petegem, P, Verhoeven, JC, Buvenes, I (2009) Linking the policymaking capacities of schools and the quality of school self-evaluations: The view of school leaders. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 37(5).
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Vitale, DC, Armenakis, AA, Field, HS (2008) Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods for organizational diagnosis: possible priming effects? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1): 87105.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wallis, JL, Dollery, B, McLoughlin, L (2007) Reform and Leadership in the Public Sector: A Political Economy Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Google Scholar
Yang, B, Zheng, W (2003) A holistic equilibrium theory of organization development. Human Resource Development Review 2(3): 346354.
Google Scholar
Yang, B, Zheng, W (2005) A Holistic Equilibrium Theory of Organization Development. University of Minnesota, 5074. Minneapolis, United States.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EMA-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in: