Teacher appraisal has been widely practised in China for decades. With the introduction, in 2009, of the teacher performance pay system, however, teacher appraisal has undergone certain changes. This study explores the practice of teacher appraisal, using a qualitative approach and taking public schools in Shanghai as its research sites. The methods adopted include interviews with teachers and school administrators, observation of relevant activities and document analysis. The study reveals that teacher appraisal in schools in Shanghai is not a one-off event. Although the procedure for generating appraisal results occurs at the end of each year, data collection activities for appraisal – including lesson observation, student evaluation of teachers and checking teachers’ tasks – are conducted throughout the whole year. The current teacher appraisal system has been a success, and this study identifies four factors contributing to that success. First, administrative and developmental appraisal coexist as one single appraisal system. Second, teacher appraisal is integrated with other aspects of schools’ business. Third, teacher appraisal is perceived by teachers as credible and fair. Fourth, non-technical aspects of appraisal, such as teachers’ psychology and social dynamics, are taken into account during the appraisal process.

Andrews, HA (2004) Accountable Teacher Evaluation: Toward Highly Qualified and Competent Teachers. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
Google Scholar
Attinello, JR, Lare, D, Waters, F (2006) The value of teacher portfolios for evaluation and professional growth. National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bulletin 90(2): 132152.
Google Scholar | Abstract
Baker, EL, Barton, PE, Darling-Hammond, L. (2010) Problems with the Use of Student Test Scores to Evaluate Teachers. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Google Scholar
Beerens, D (2000) Evaluating Teachers for Professional Growth: Creating a Culture of Motivation and Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Blase, J, Kirby, PC (2009) Bringing Out the Best in Teachers: What Effective Principals Do, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Bridges, EM, Groves, BR (1999) The macro- and micropolitics of personnel evaluation: a framework. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13(4): 321337.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cardy, RL, Dobbins, G (1994) Performance Appraisal: Alternative Perspectives. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
Google Scholar
Chen, ZH (2012) An analysis of several reforms on teacher evaluation. Teacher Education Research 24(4): 6266.
Google Scholar
Creswell, JW (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Danielson, C (2001) New trends in teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership 58(5): 1215.
Google Scholar | ISI
Danielson, C (2007) Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching, 2nd edn. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Danielson, C (2013) The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instruction. Princeton, NJ: Danielson Group.
Google Scholar
Danielson, C, McGreal, TL (2000) Teacher Evaluation to Enhance Professional Practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L, Amrein-Beardsley, A, Haertel, E, Rothstein, J (2012) Evaluating teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan 93(6): 815.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Day, C (1989) Issues in the management of appraisal for professional development. Westminster Studies in Education 12: 315.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dominguez, MR (1995) Attitudes of superintendents regarding the use of student evaluation of instruction in the secondary school teacher evaluation process. EdD thesis, University of Houston, TX.
Google Scholar
Donaldson, ML (2013) Principals’ approaches to cultivating teacher effectiveness constraints and opportunities in hiring, assigning, evaluating, and developing teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly 49(5): 838882.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Duke, DL (1995) Teacher Evaluation Policy: From Accountability to Professional Development. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Evans, A, Tomlinson, J (1989) Teacher Appraisal: A Nationwide Approach. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Google Scholar
Gall, MD, Borg, WR, Gall, JP (1996) Educational Research: An Introduction, 6th edn. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Google Scholar
Guo, LH (2006) Development-oriented assessment of teachers: a case study of no. 21 middle school in Liaoyang. Master’s thesis, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang.
Google Scholar
Hallinger, P, Heck, RH, Murphy, J (2014) Teacher evaluation and school improvement: an analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 26(1): 528.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hou, DK, Wan, JL (2005) A case study of the current teacher evaluation system in schools: from a perspective of teacher professional development. Teacher Education Research 17(5): 4953.
Google Scholar
Joyce, BR, Showers, B (2002) Student Achievement Through Staff Development, 3rd edn. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Kane, TJ, Staiger, DO (2012) Gathering Feedback for Teaching: Combining High-Quality Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Google Scholar
Kelly, A, Downey, C (2010) Value-added measures for schools in England: looking inside the ‘black box’of complex metrics. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 22(3): 181198.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kyriakides, L, Demetriou, D (2007) Introducing a teacher evaluation system based on teacher effectiveness research: an investigation of stakeholders’ perceptions. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 20(1–2): 4364.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Liu, S, Teddlie, C (2005) A follow-up study on teacher evaluation in China: historical analysis and latest trends. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 18(4): 253272.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Liu, S, Zhao, D (2013) Teacher evaluation in China: latest trends and future directions. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 25(3): 231250.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mathers, C, Oliva, M, Laine, SWM (2008) Improving Instruction Through Effective Teacher Evaluation: Options for States and Districts. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
Google Scholar
McGreal, TL (1988) Evaluation for enhancing instruction: linking teacher evaluation and staff development. In SJ, Stanley, WJ, Popham (eds), Teacher Evaluation: Six Prescriptions for Success. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 129.
Google Scholar
McLaughlin, MW, Pfeifer, RS (1988) Teacher Evaluation: Improvement, Accountability, and Effective Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Mercer . (2005) Challenging appraisal orthodoxies: teacher evaluation and professional development in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 18(4): 273287.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Milanowski, AT, Heneman, HG (2001) Assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based teacher evaluation system: a pilot study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15(3): 193212.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ministry of Education (2001) Guideline on the Curriculum Reform in Basic Education (Vol. 2007) Beijing: Ministry of Education.
Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (2002) Circular on Advancing Reform of the Evaluation and Examination System in Schools. Beijing: Ministry of Education.
Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (2008) Guidelines to Teacher Performance Evaluation in Compulsory Schools. Beijing: Ministry of Education.
Google Scholar
Monyatsi, P, Steyn, T, Kamper, G (2006) Teacher appraisal in Botswana secondary schools: a critical analysis. South African Journal of Education 26(2): 215228.
Google Scholar | ISI
Murphy, J, Hallinger, P, Heck, RH (2013) Leading via teacher evaluation the case of the missing clothes? Educational Researcher 42(6): 349354.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Orphanos, S (2014) What matters to principals when they evaluate teachers? Evidence from Cyprus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 42(2): 243258.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ovando, MN, Ramirez, A (2007) Principals’ instructional leadership within a teacher performance appraisal system: enhancing students’ academic success. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 20(1): 85110.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Patton, MQ (2002) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Peterson, KD (2000) Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Putuo District Education Bureau (2012) Notification of the Implementation of 2012 Staff Performance Appraisal in Schools in Compulsory Education in the Putuo District. Shanghai: Putuo District Education Bureau.
Google Scholar
Robles, F (2007) Veteran teachers’ perspectives on teacher evaluation and how they want to be evaluated. EdD thesis, University of the Pacific.
Google Scholar
Scriven, M (1994) Duties of the teacher. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 8(2): 151184.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Shinkfield, AJ, Stufflebeam, DL (1995) Teacher Evaluation: Guide to Effective Practice. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Google Scholar | Crossref
State Council (2008) Guidelines to the Implementation of Performance Pay in Compulsory Schools. Beijing: State Council.
Google Scholar
Stiggins, RJ, Duke, DL (1988) The Case for Commitment to Teacher Growth: Research on Teacher Evaluation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Stronge, JH (2006) Evaluating Teaching: A Guide to Current Thinking and Best Practice, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stronge, JH, Tucker, PD (1999) The politics of teacher evaluation: a case study of new system design and implementation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13(4): 339359.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stronge, JH, Tucker, PD (2003) Handbook on Teacher Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Performance. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education.
Google Scholar
Tao, XQ (2005) Change appraisal: improvement of teacher appraisal systems in Shanghai schools. Shanghai Education Nil(6B): 1215.
Google Scholar
Tucker, PD, Stronge, JH, Gareis, CR, Beers, CS (2003) The efficacy of portfolios for teacher evaluation and professional development: do they make a difference? Educational Administration Quarterly 39(5): 572602.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Walker, A, Dimmock, C (2000) One size fits all? Teacher appraisal in a chinese culture. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 14(2): 155178.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wang, J (2005) Initial research on developmental teacher appraisal. Journal of Xiamen Educational College 8(2): 4951.
Google Scholar
Wang, L, Lai, M, Lo, LN-K (2014) Teacher professionalism under the recent reform of performance pay in Mainland China. PROSPECTS 44(3): 429443.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wheeler, PH, Scriven, M (1997) Building the foundation: teacher roles and responsibilities. In JH, Stronge (ed.) Evaluating Teaching: A Guide to Current Thinking and Best Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2758.
Google Scholar
Wise, AE, Darling-Hammond, L, McLaughlin, MW, Bernstein, HT (1985) Teacher evaluation: a study of effective practices. The Elementary School Journal 86(1): 60121.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Zhang, XF (2008) The role of teacher appraisal in teacher professional development: A case study in schools in Shanghai. PhD thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zhang, XF, Ng, HM (2011) A case study of teacher appraisal in Shanghai, China: in relation to teacher professional development. Asia Pacific Education Review 12(4): 569580.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EMA-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles