The notion of schools as ‘loosely coupled’ organizations has been widely discussed in the research literature. Many argue it is either a protective mechanism for schools to buffer external pressure or a barrier for implementing new reforms. Against the backdrop of systemic change and accountability, we applied a two-level hierarchical linear model to nationally representative data in the US, testing the ‘loosely coupled’ theory through examining the association between data-informed improvement efforts at the school level and data-informed instruction at the classroom level. Statistically significant associations were identified but with a small proportion of variance explained, indicating that the top-down systemic change strategy failed to tighten the system as intended. Alternatively, bottom-up strategies, such as professional learning communities, which operate under the assumption of working with loose coupling, should be considered.

Babbie, E (2010) The Practice of Social Research, 12th edn. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Google Scholar
Bryk, AS, Sebring, PB, Allensworth, E, Luppescu, S, Easton, J (2009) Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bryk, AS, Gomez, LM, Grunow, A (2011) Getting ideas into action: building networked improvement communities in education. In Hallinan, MT (ed) Frontiers in Sociology of Education (pp. 127162). New York: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Celio, MB, Harvey, J (2005) Buried Treasure: Developing a Management Guide from Mountains of School Data. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
Google Scholar
Cheong, YF, Fotiu, RP, Raudenbush, RW (2001) Efficiency and robustness of alternative estimators for 2- and 3-level models: the case of NAEP. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 26: 411429.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Coburn, CE, Turner, EO (2012) The practice of data use: an introduction. American Journal of Education 118(2): 99111.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cohen, DK (1990) A revolution in one classroom: the case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 12(3): 311329.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Deal, TE, Celotti, LD (1980) How much influence do (and can) educational administrators have on classrooms? Phi Delta Kappan 61(1): 471473.
Google Scholar
Diamond, JB, Cooper, K (2007) The uses of testing data in urban elementary schools: some lessons from Chicago. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education 106(1): 241263.
Google Scholar | Crossref
DuFour, R (2004) What is a ‘professional learning community’? Educational Leadership 61(8): 611.
Google Scholar | ISI
Dunne, F, Nave, B, Lewis, A (2000) Critical friends groups: teachers helping teachers to improve student learning. Phi Delta Kappan 28(4): 3137.
Google Scholar
Dyckhoff, AL, Zielke, D, Bültmann, M, Chatti, MA, Schroeder, U (2012) Design and implementation of a learning analytics toolkit for teachers. Educational Technology and Society 15(3): 5876.
Google Scholar | ISI
Elmore, RF (2000) Building a New Structure for School Leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
Google Scholar
Firestone, WA, Wilson, BL (1985) Using bureaucratic and cultural linkages to improve instruction: the principal’s contribution. Educational Administration Quarterly 21(2): 730.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Fusarelli, LD (2002) Tightly coupled policy in loosely coupled systems: institutional capacity and organizational change. Journal of Educational Administration 40(6): 561575.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fusarelli, LD (2005) Gubernatorial reactions to No Child Left Behind: politics, pressure and education reform. Peabody Journal of Education 80(2): 120136.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Goodlad, J, Klein, MF and Associates . (1975) Looking Behind the Classroom Door. Worthington, OH: Charles A. Jones Publishing Company.
Google Scholar
Goldspink, C (2007) Rethinking educational reform a loosely coupled and complex systems perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 35(1): 2750.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Halverson, R, Grigg, J, Prichett, R, Thomas, C (2007) The new instructional leadership: creating data-driven instructional systems in school. Journal of School Leadership 17(2): 159194.
Google Scholar
Harris, A, Jones, M (2010) Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools 13(2): 172181.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hess, FM, Fullerton, J (2009) The numbers we need: bringing balanced scorecards to education data. Phi Delta Kappa 90(9): 66569.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hollins, ER, McIntyre, LR, DeBose, C, Hollins, KS, Towner, A (2004) Promoting a self-sustaining learning community: investigating an internal model for teacher development. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 17(2): 247264.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Honig, MI, Coburn, C (2008) Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy 22(4): 578608.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Honig, MI, Hatch, TC (2004) Crafting coherence: how schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher 33(8): 1630.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hox, JJ, Maas, CJM (2001) The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with pseudobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling 8(2): 157174.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ingersoll, R (1993) Loosely coupled organizations revisited. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 11: 81112.
Google Scholar
Ingersoll, R (1994) Organizational control in secondary schools. Harvard Review 64(2): 150172.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ingersoll, R (1996) Teachers’ decision-making power and school conflict. Sociology of Education 69(2): 159176.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ingram, D, Louis, KS, Schroeder, RG (2004) Accountability policies and teacher decision making: barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record 106(6): 12581287.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Johnson, L, Smith, R, Willis, H, Levine, A, Haywood, K (2011) The 2011 Horizon Report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
Google Scholar
Kauermann, G, Carroll, RJ (2001) A note on the efficiency of sandwich covariance matrix estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96(456): 13871396.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lachat, MA, Williams, M, Smith, SC (2006) Making sense of all your data. Principal Leadership. (Middle Level Ed.) 7(2): 1621.
Google Scholar
Lasky, S, Schaffer, G, Hopkins, T (2009) Learning to think and talk from evidence: developing system-wide capacity for learning conversations. In Earl, LM, Timperley, H (eds) Professional Learning Conversations: Challenges in Using Evidence for Improvement (pp. 95108). New York: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Little, JW (2012) Understanding data use practice among teachers: the contribution of micro-process studies. American Journal of Education 118(2): 143166.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Louis, KS, Marks, HM (1998) Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education 106(4): 532575.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lutz, FW (1982) Tightening up loose coupling in organizations of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly 27(4): 653669.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McCoach, DB (2010) Hierarchical linear modeling. In GR, Hancock, RO, Mueller (eds) The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences (pp. 123140) New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Mandinach, EB, Honey, M, Light, D (2006) A theoretical framework for data driven decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. Retrieved from http://cct.edc.org/admin/publications/speeches/DataFrame_AERA06.pdf
Google Scholar
Mason, SA (2003) Learning from data: The role of professional learning communities. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago IL.
Google Scholar
Meyer, JW, Rowan, B (1978) The structure of educational organizations. In Meyer, JW (ed) Environments and Organizations (pp. 78109). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Morley, L, Rassool, N (2000) School effectiveness: new managerialism, quality and the Japanization of education. Journal of Education Policy 15(2): 169183.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Orton, JD, Weick, KE (1990) Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review 15(2): 203223.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
O’Day, JA (2002) Complexity, accountability and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review 72(3): 293329.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pajak, E, Green, A (2003) Loosely coupled organizations, misrecognition and social reproduction. International Journal of Leadership in Education 6(4): 393413.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Raudenbush, SW, Bryk, AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R, Rosnow, RL (1984) Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Rowan, B (2002) Rationality and reality in organizational management: using the coupling metaphor to understand educational (and other) organizations-a concluding comment. Journal of Educational Administration 40(6): 604611.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rudner, LM, Boston, C (2003) Data warehousing: beyond disaggregation. Educational Leadership 60(5): 6265.
Google Scholar | ISI
Sarason, S (1982) The Culture of the School and the Problem of Change, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Google Scholar
Shen, J, Ma, X (2006) Does systemic change work? Curricular and instructional practice in the context of systemic change. Leadership and Policy in Schools 5(3): 231256.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Shen, J, Cooley, V, Reeves, P, Burt, W, Ryan, L, Rainey, JM, Yuan, W (2010) Using data for decision-making: Perspectives from 16 principals in Michigan, USA. International Review of Education 56(4): 435456.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Smith, MS, O’Day, JA (1990) Systemic school reform. In Fuhrman, S, Malen, B (eds) The Politics of Curriculum and Testing (pp. 233267). Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Spillane, JP (1999) External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: the mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies 31(2): 143175.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Spillane, JP (2012) Data in practice: conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education 118(2): 113141.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Spillane, JP, Parize, LM, Sherer, JZ (2011) Organizational routines as coupling mechanisms policy, school administration and the technical core. American Educational Research Journal 48(3): 586619.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Stoll, L, Bolam, R, McMahon, A, Wallace, M, Thomas, S (2006) Professional learning communities: a review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change 7(4): 221258.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Strahan, D (2003) Promoting a collaborative professional culture in three elementary schools that have beaten the odds. The Elementary School Journal 104(2): 127146.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Supovitz, JA, Klein, V (2003) Mapping a Course for Improved Student Learning: How Innovative Schools Systematically Use Student Performance Data to Guide Improvement. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Google Scholar
Thorn, CA (2001) Knowledge management for educational information systems: what is the state of the field? Education Policy Analysis Archives 9(47): 47.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Thornton, B, Perreault, G (2002) Becoming a data-based leader: An introduction. NASSP Bulletin 86(630): 8696.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
US Department of Education (n.d.) Using data to influence classroom decisions. Available at: http://www2.ed.gov/teachers/nclbguide/datadriven.pdf (accessed 1 July 2012).
Google Scholar
Wang, M, Long, Q (2011) Modified robust variance estimator for generalized estimating equations with improved small-sample performance. Statistics in Medicine 30(11): 12781291.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Weick, KE (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(l): 119.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EMA-article-ppv for $36.00