Central coordination characterises centralised education systems. Centralised systems pride themselves on efficient systemic planning for strategic foresightedness. This study investigates how educators fostered partnerships towards lateral networking propensities or laterality in a centralised system with hierarchical tendencies. A qualitative method was applied in examining newly formed centrally initiated, yet interest-based partnerships that were supported by central agency affordances. The concept of ‘champion resource’ – that is, teacher-leaders who champion particular innovations – is introduced to explain the integration of individual resources and collective efforts that can benefit teachers in their learning process through the appropriation of pedagogical innovations. We argue that tenets of partnerships drawn from studies conducted in decentralised systems can inform the dynamics of laterality in centralised systems. In our study, developing laterality starting from champion resource/teacher dyads was witnessed, and the aim is that the dyadic relationships can grow to multi-connected teacher-to-teacher laterality. We argue that the growth of this laterality is both cultivated by the ‘champion resource’ and afforded through centralised coordination efforts, which we will illustrate through the data from this study. We are in a unique position to study partnerships in a centralised system from the early stages of inception and towards laterality. This study has begun to clarify the possibilities of developing these partnerships systematically, and recommendations are made on how to advance partnerships in centralised systems.

Brass, DJ, Galaskiewicz, J, Greve, HR, Tsai, W (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal 47(6): 795817.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bryk, A, Schneider, B (2002) Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar
Carley, K (1992) Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organization Science 3(1): 2046.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Chapman, C, Allen, T (2005) Partnerships for Improvement: The Specialist Schools Achievement Programme. Coventry, UK: University of Warwick.
Google Scholar
Chrispeels, JH, Burke, PH, Johnson, P, Daly, AJ (2008) Aligning mental models of district and school leadership teams for reform. Education and Urban Society 40(6): 730750.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Coburn, CE, Talbert, JE (2006) Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: Mapping the terrain. American Journal of Education 112(4): 469495.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cochran-Smith, M, Lytle, SL (1999) Teacher learning in professional communities: Three knowledge practice relationships. In: Pearson, PD, Iran-Nejad, A (eds) Review of research in education. Volume 24. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, pp.251307.
Google Scholar
Cuban, L, Usdan, M (eds) (2003) Powerful Reforms with Shallow Roots: Improving America’s Urban Schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Daly, AJ, Chrispeels, JH (2008) A question of trust: Predictive conditions for technical and adaptive leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools 7(1): 3063.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Datnow, A, Hubbard, L, Mehan, H (2002) Extending Educational Reform: From One School to Many. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge/Falmer.
Google Scholar
Datnow, A, Lasky, S, Stringfield, S, Teddlie, C (2006) Integrating Educational Systems for Successful Reform in Diverse Contexts. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
DiMaggio, PJ, Powell, WW (2000) The iron cage revisited-Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (reprinted from American Sociological 48(2): 147–160, 1983). In: Baum, JC, Dobbin, F (eds) Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management (Advances in Strategic Management, Volume 17). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.143166.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Goldspink, C (2007) Rethinking educational reform: A loosely coupled and complex systems perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 35(1): 2750.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Granovetter, M (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1(6): 201233.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hargreaves, A, Shirley, D (2009) The Fourth Way: The Inspiring Future for Educational Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press (SAGE Publications).
Google Scholar
Heng, MA, Marsh, CJ (2009) Understanding middle leaders: A closer look at middle leadership in primary schools in Singapore. Educational Studies 35(5): 525536.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hightower, AM (2002) San Diego’s big boom: District bureaucracy supports culture of learning. Document No. R-02–2. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Available at: https://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/SanDiego-AH-01-2002.pdf (accessed April 23, 2016).
Google Scholar
Hinds, PJ, Bailey, DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science 14(6): 615632.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Honig, IM, Copland, MA, Rainey, L. (2010) Central office transformation for district-wide teaching and learning improvement. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Available at: https://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/S2-CentralAdmin-04-2010.pdf (accessed January 11, 2016).
Google Scholar
Honig, IM, Ikemoto, G (2008) Adaptive assistance for learning improvement efforts: The case of the Institute for Learning. Peabody Journal of Education 83(3): 328363.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hubbard, L, Mehan, H, Stein, MK (2006) Reform as Learning: School Reform, Organizational Culture, and Community Politics in San Diego. New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Jarvenpaa, LS, Shaw, RT, Staples, DS (2004) Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Information Systems Research 15(3): 250267.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Johnson, EJ, Chrispeels, JH (2010) Linking the central office and its schools for reform. Educational Administration Quarterly 46(5): 738775.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Karlsen, GE (2000) Decentralized centralism: Framework for a better understanding of governance in the field of education. Journal of Education Policy 15(5): 525538.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Knapp, MS, Copeland, M, Talbert, JE (2003) Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Available at: https://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/LforLSummary-02-03.pdf (accessed February 8, 2016).
Google Scholar
Lasky, S (2004) Toward a policy framework for analyzing educational system effects. CRESPAR Technical Report No. 71. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, Johns Hopkins University. Available at: http://www.jhucsos.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Report71.pdf (accessed March 18, 2016).
Google Scholar
Leithwood, K, Louis, K, Anderson, S, Wahlstrom, K (2004) Executive summary: How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation. Available at: http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/pages/executive-summary-how-leadership-influences-student-learning.aspx (accessed March 18, 2016).
Google Scholar
Lieberman, A (2000) Network as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education 51(3): 221227.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Lindsay, G, Harris, A, Chapman, C, Muijs, D (2005) School federations: Preliminary report to the DfES. Coventry, UK: University of Warwick.
Google Scholar
McLaughlin, MW, Talbert, JE (2003) Reforming districts: How districts support school reform. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Available at: https://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/ReformingDistricts-09-2003.pdf (accessed December 13, 2015).
Google Scholar
Ministry of Education Singapore (MOE) (2015) Every school a good school. Available at: https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system/every-school-a-good-school (accessed March 15, 2016).
Google Scholar
Ministry of Education Singapore (MOE) (2016) Curriculum planning and development. Available at: https://www.moe.gov.sg/about/org-structure/cpdd (accessed November 17, 2016).
Google Scholar
Ministry of Education Singapore (MOE) (n.d.a) Future Schools@Singapore-Learning communities. Available at: http://edulab.moe.edu.sg/edulab/slot/u110/fssg/lc.html (accessed November 17, 2016).
Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (MOE) (n.d.b) i in practice (Education Technology Division Publication). Singapore.
Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (MOE) (n.d.b) i in practice II (Education Technology Division Publication). Singapore.
Google Scholar
Muijs, D, West, M, Ainscow, M (2010) Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 21(1): 526.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Neuman, WL (2006) Social Research Methods. Sydney, Australia: Pearson International Edition.
Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B (2004) Inter-Firm Collaboration, Networks and Strategy: An Integrated Approach. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Ng, PT (2003) The Singapore school and the school excellence model. Educational Research for Policy and Practice 2(1): 2739.
Google Scholar | Crossref
O’Day, J (2002) Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review 72(3): 293329.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Oliver, C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16(1): 145179.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21CS) (2009) P21 framework definitions. Available at: http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf (accessed December 1, 2014).
Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J, Salancik, GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Google Scholar
Rowan, B (1990) Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. Review of Research in Education 16(1): 353389.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Rowley, TJ (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 887910.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sailor, W (ed.) (2002) Whole-School Success and Inclusive Education: Building Partnerships for Learning, Achievement, and Accountability. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Salleh, H (2016) Facilitation for professional learning community conversations in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 36(2): 285300.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sanders, M (2012) Achieving scale at the district level: A longitudinal multiple case study of a partnership reform. Educational Administration Quarterly 48(1): 154186.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Saunders, MG, Epstein, JL (2000) The national network of partnership schools: How research influences educational practice. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk 5(1–2): 6176.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Saunders, SC, Ahuja, KM (2006) Are all distributed teams the same? Differentiating between temporary and ongoing distributed teams. Small Group Research 37(6): 662700.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Shaari, I, Hung, D (2013) Building relationships between schools and community agencies to meet 21st century learning demands: Critical factors. KEDI Journal of Education Policy 10(1): 1942.
Google Scholar
Skrla, L, Scheurich, JJ, Johnson, JF (2000) Equity-driven achievement-focused school districts: A report on systemic school success in four Texas school districts serving diverse student populations. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center, University of Texas at Austin. Available at: http://www.utdanacenter.org/downloads/products/equitydistricts.pdf (accessed November 17, 2016).
Google Scholar
Snipes, J, Doolittle, F, Herlihy, C (2002) Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools. Available at: http://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/foundations_for_success_fr.pdf (accessed November 18, 2016).
Google Scholar
Tan, C (2008) Improving schools through reflection for teachers: Lessons from Singapore. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 19(2): 225238.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Tan, C, Ng, TP (2007) Dynamics of change: Decentralised centralism of education in Singapore. Journal of Education Change 8(2): 155168.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Thompson, CL, Sykes, G, Skrla, L (2008) Coherent, instructionally-focused district leadership: Toward a theoretical account. East Lansing, MI: Education Policy Center, Michigan State University. Available at: http://education.msu.edu/epc/forms/Thompson_et_al_2008_Coherent_Instructionally_Focused_District_Leadership.pdf (accessed December 12, 2016).
Google Scholar
Togneri, W, Anderson, SE (2003) Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instruction and achievement in all schools. Washington, DC: Learning First Alliance and Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Available at: http://www.learningfirst.org/sites/learningfirst/files/assets/biefullreport.pdf (accessed December 12, 2016).
Google Scholar
Toh, Y, Jamaludin, A, Hung, WLD, Chua, PMH (2014) Ecological leadership: Going beyond system leadership for diffusing school-based innovations in the crucible of change for 21st century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 23(4): 835850.
Google Scholar | Crossref
West, M (2010) School-to-school cooperation as a strategy for improving student outcomes in challenging contexts. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1): 93112.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Yin, R (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EMA-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0