Among the multitude of studies that have examined an array of variables related to school leadership, only a small percentage have rigorously examined how school leaders spend their time. The complex role of school leaders poses challenges to common methods of collecting data about school leader time use, which subsequently threaten the validity of researchers’ claims. In this study we identified three prevalent challenges to studying school leader time use, and applied technological advancements in an event sampling methodology framework to mitigate the challenges associated with studying school leader time use. We used new technology and event sampling methodology to collect data, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. during 28 consecutive days, on the time use of 11 school leaders. Our system of notification and response achieved an overall response rate of 85% and enabled the collection of school leaders’ perceptions of their time use as they worked in multiple locations over an extended period of time. Finally, we have proposed a research agenda to study rigorously the time use of school leaders.

Barnes, CA, Camburn, E, Sanders, BR, Sebastian, J (2010) Developing instructional leaders: using mixed methods to explore the black box of planned change in principals’ professional practice. Educational Administration Quarterly 46(2): 241279.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Berman, J (1982) The Managerial Behavior of Female High School Principals: Implications for Training. US: PhD thesis, Columbia University.
Google Scholar
Blendinger, J, Ariratana, W, Jones, LT (2000) Field investigation of on-the-job behavior of an elementary school principal. In: Annual meeting of the mid-south educational research association, Bowling Green, KY, 15–17 November 2000. Lanham, MD: Educational Resources Information Center, pp. 112.
Google Scholar
Bolman, LG, Deal, TE (2003) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Calder, CR, Shibles, M (1974) The British headmaster and the American principal: A comparison of roles. The Elementary School Journal 74(7): 393398.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Camburn, EM, Spillane, JP, Sebastian, J (2010) Assessing the utility of a daily log for measuring principal leadership practice. Educational Administration Quarterly 46(5): 707737.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Chung, KA, Miskel, CG (1989) A comparative study of principals’ administrative behaviour. Journal of Educational Administration 27(1): 4557.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Coalition of Community Schools (n.d.) What is a community school? Available at: http://www.communityschools.org/aboutschools/what_is_a_community_school.aspx (accessed 20 March 2017).
Google Scholar
Connors, F, Morrison, J (1925) A contrast of the preparation and work of men and women elementary school principals. Educational Research Bulletin 4(17): 255260.
Google Scholar
Connors, F, Morrison, J (1926) The influence of the size of city upon the work of the elementary school principal. Educational Research Bulletin 5(3): 4559.
Google Scholar
Crowson, RL, Porter-Gehrie (1980) The discretionary behavior of principals in large-city schools. Educational Administration Quarterly 16(1): 4569.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Davis, HC (1953) Where does the time go? California Journal of Secondary Education 28(6): 347361.
Google Scholar
Duke, DL, Landahl, M (2011) ‘Raising test scores was the easy part’: A case study of the third year of school turnaround. International Studies in Educational Administration 39(3): 91114.
Google Scholar
Duke, DL, Salmonowicz, MJ (2010) Key decisions of a first-year ‘turnaround’ principal. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership 38(1): 3358.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Dwyer, D, Lee, G, Rowan, B, Bossert, S (1983) Five Principals in Action: Perspectives on Instructional Management. San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research.
Google Scholar
English, M (1927) A comparative study of the time distribution of rural and urban principals. National Education Association Bulletin 7(1): 419.
Google Scholar
Gaziel, H (1995) Managerial work patterns of principals at high-and average-performing Israeli elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal 96(2): 179194.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Goldring, E, Huff, J, May, H, Camburn, E (2008) School context and individual characteristics: what influences principal practice? Journal of Educational Administration 46(3): 332352.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Graves, W, Stoller, N (1953) Principals study their jobs. National Elementary Principal 33(2): 1021.
Google Scholar
Griffith, J (1999) The school leadership/school climate relation: Identification of school configurations associated with change in principals. Educational Administration Quarterly 35(2): 267291.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Grissom, JA, Loeb, S, Master, B (2013) Effective instructional time use for school leaders: longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher 42(8): 433444.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Grissom, J, Loeb, S, Mitani, H (2015) Principal time management skills: Explaining patterns in principals’ time use, job stress, and perceived effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration 53(6): 773793.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hallinger, P, Heck, RH (1996) Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly 32(1): 544.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hallinger, P, Murphy, J (1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal 86(2): 217247.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Heck, RH, Hallinger, P (2005) The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today? Educational Management Administration & Leadership 33(2): 229244.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Horng, EL, Klasik, D, Loeb, S (2010) Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education 116(4): 491523.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jones, N, Youngs, P (2012) Attitudes and affect: Daily emotions and their association with the commitment and burnout of beginning teachers. Teachers College Record 114: 136.
Google Scholar | ISI
Juster, FT, Ono, H, Stafford, FP (2003) An assessment of alternative measures of time use. Sociological Methodology 33: 1954.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kalil, A, Ryan, R, Chor, E (2014) Time investments in children across family structures. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 654(1): 150168.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Kane, T, Kerr, K, Pianta, R (2014) Designing Teacher Evaluation Systems: New guidance from the Measures of Effecting Teaching Project. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Google Scholar
Kmetz, JT, Willower, DJ (1982) Elementary school principals’ work behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly 18(4): 6278.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Knoeppel, RC, Rinehart, JS (2008) Student achievement and principal quality: explaining the relationship. Journal of School Leadership 18(5): 501527.
Google Scholar
Krug, SE, Scott, C, Ahadi, S (1989) An Experience Sampling Approach to the Study of Principal Instructional Leadership 1: Results from the Principal Activity Sampling Form. Urbana, IL: National Center for School Leadership.
Google Scholar
Kuehny, MS (1925) The effect of daily schedules or programs. Bulletin, Department of Elementary School Principals 5(1): 4251.
Google Scholar
Lee, M, Hallinger, P (2012) National contexts influencing principals’ time use and allocation: economic development, societal culture, and educational system. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23(4): 461482.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Leithwood, K, Jantzi, D (2005) A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership & Policy in Schools 4(3): 177199.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Leithwood, K, Seashore-Louis, K, Anderson, S, Wahlstrom, K (2004) How Leadership Influences Student Learning: A Review of Research for the Learning from Leadership Project. New York: Wallace Foundation.
Google Scholar
Martin, WJ, Willower, DJ (1981) The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly 17(1): 6990.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
May, H, Supovitz, JA (2011) The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly 47(2): 332352.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
May, H, Huff, J, Goldring, E (2012) A longitudinal study of principals’ activities and student performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 23(4): 417439.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Morris, VC, Crowson, R, Porter-Gehrie, C, Hurwitz, E (1984) Principals in Action: The Reality of Managing Schools. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Google Scholar
NASSP (National Association of Secondary School Principals) (1953) A study of the high school principalship in Pennsylvania. NASSP Bulletin 37(198): 118120.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
O’Dempsey, K (1976) Time analysis of administrators’ work patterns and roles of high school principals. Administrative Bulletin 8(26): 310.
Google Scholar
Orr, M (2015) Division a vice presidential address. In: Annual meeting of the American educational research association, Chicago, IL, 16–20 April 2015. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Google Scholar
Orr, M, Berg, B, Shore, R, Meier, E (2008) Putting the pieces together: leadership for change in low-performing urban schools. Education and Urban Society 40(6): 670693.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Orr, M, King, C, LaPointe, M (2010) Districts Developing Leaders: Lessons on Consumer Actions and Program Approaches from Eight Urban Districts. Boston: Education Development Center, Inc.
Google Scholar
Peterson, KD (1977) The principal’s tasks. Administrator’s Notebook 26(8): 25.
Google Scholar
Reynolds, D, Sammons, P, De Fraine, B, Van Damme, J, Townsend, T, Teddlie, C, Stringfield, S (2014) Educational effectiveness research: a state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 25(2): 197230.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rosenblatt, Z, Somech, A (1998) The work behavior of Israeli elementary school principals: Expectations versus reality. Educational Administration Quarterly 34(4): 505532.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Roth, J, Brooks-Gunn, J, Linver, M, Hofferth, S (2003) What happens during the school day? Time diaries from a national sample of elementary school teachers. Teachers College Record 105(3): 317343.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sammons, P (2007) School Effectiveness and Equity: Making Connections. A Review of School Effectiveness and Improvement Research – Its Implications for Practitioners and Policy Makers. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
Google Scholar
Shadish, WR, Cook, TD, Campbell, DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Shanahan, MJ, Flaherty, BP (2001) Dynamic patterns of time use in adolescence. Child Development 72(2): 385401.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Spillane, JP, Camburn, EM, Pustejovsky, J (2008) Taking a distributed perspective: epistemological and methodological tradeoffs in operationalizing the leaderplus aspect. Journal of Educational Administration 46(2): 189213.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wolcott, HF (1973) The Man in the Principal’s Office: An Ethnography. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Google Scholar
Zirkel, S, Garcia, JA, Murphy, MC (2015) Experience-sampling research methods and their potential for education research. Educational Researcher 44(1): 716.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EMA-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 1