This study examines the institutional visibility of the university governing body amongst staff, as an unexplored factor influencing the effectiveness of the body in performing stewardship and strategic responsibilities on behalf of the university. A constructionist view of governance is taken in order to examine the enactment of governing body institutional visibility within the spaces of the university, from the formal projection of its legal and constitutional duties, to communication of the decisions made at governing body meetings, through to governors’ informal encounters and engagement with staff. An institutional visibility spectrum was developed based on governing body ‘apparency’, ‘transparency’ and ‘engagement’, prior to interviewing secretaries and clerks as key actors in the governance system. It was found that governor visibility through engagement and interaction with a range of staff outside the ‘boardroom’ was perceived as a contributor to governing body effectiveness, including governors’ knowledge-building and ability to contribute to strategic initiatives in the host university.

Augé, M (1995) Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London and New York: Verso.
Google Scholar
Baird, J (2006) Beyond professionalisation: enhancing the governing culture for Australian university boards. Tertiary Education and Management 12(4): 297309.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Banks, JA (1998) The lives and values of researchers: implications for educating citizens in a multicultural society. Educational Research 27(7): 417.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bargh, C, Scott, P, Smith, D (1996). Governing Universities. Changing the Culture? Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Beitin, BK (2012) Interview and sampling: How many and whom. In: Gubrium, JF, Holstein, JA, Marvast, AB, McKinney, KD (eds) The Sage Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bennett, B (2002) The new style board of governors - Are they working? Higher Education Quarterly 56(3): 287302.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Berle, A, Means, GC (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property (2nd Edition). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Google Scholar
Bevir, M (2012) Governance: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brighenti, AM (2010) Visibility in Social Theory and Social Research. Basingstokeand New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Burgess, RG (1984) Autobiographical accounts and research experience. In: Burgess, RG (ed.) The Research Process in Educational Settings: Ten Case Studies. Lewes: The Falmer Press.
Google Scholar
Carr, ECJ, Worth, A (2001) The use of telephone interviews for research. Journal of Research in Nursing 6(1): 511524.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Chait, RP, Holland, TP, Taylor, BE (1996) Improving the Performance of Governing Boards. American Council on Education. Westport, CT: Oryx Press.
Google Scholar
Crotty, M (1998) The Foundations of Social Research. Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Creswell, J (2007) Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd ed. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
CUC (Committee of University Chairs) (2014) The Higher Education Code of Governance. Available at: http://www.universitychairs.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Published-Version.pdf (accessed 8 January 2017).
Google Scholar
CVCP (Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals) (1985) Report of The Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities.
Google Scholar
Danziger, K (1997) Naming The Mind: How Psychology Found Its Language. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Dawkins, A (2011) Boundary-crossing and governance ‘space’: Negotiation of the professional identity of secretariat staff in higher education (HE). Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 3(1): 4760.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Deem, R, Brehony, K, Heath, S (1995) Active Citizenship and the Governing of Schools. Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS (2005) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Enquiry. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi and Singapore: Sage.
Google Scholar
Farrington, D, Palfreyman, D (2006) The Law of Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Fawcett, P (2013) How are we Governed? Decentred Theory and the Core Executive. Political Studies Association Conference, University of Cardiff, Cardiff, 25–27 March 2014. Available at: http://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/684_358.pdf (accessed 8 January 2017).
Google Scholar
Finklestein, S, Mooney, AC (2003) Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Academic of Management Executive 17(2): 101103.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Giddens, A (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Gillies, M (2011) University Governance. Questions for a New Era. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI).
Google Scholar
Gittleman, S (2004) An Entrepreneurial University: The Transformation of Tufts 1976-2002. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
Google Scholar
Henkel, M (1997) Teaching quality assessments: Public accountability and academic autonomy in higher education. Evaluation 3(1): 923.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hennink, M, Hutter, I, Bailey, A (2011) Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Higher Education and Research Act (2017) (HL Bill 97). Available at: http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/highereducationandresearch.html (accessed 4 May 2017).
Google Scholar
Hill, R (2000) A study of the views of full-time further education lecturers regarding their college corporations and agencies of the further education sector. Journal of Further and Higher Education 24(1): 6775.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2014). Memorandum of Assurance and Accountability between HEFCE and Institutions. Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/reg/MAA/ (accessed 8 January 2017).
Google Scholar
Holstein, JA, Gubrium, JF (2011) The constructionist analytics of interpretive practice. In: Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Huse, M (2005) Accountability and creating accountability: a framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management 16: 6579.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jarratt, A (1985) Report of the Steering Committee in University Efficiency. London: CVCP.
Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P (2005) Strategy as Practice: An Activity Based Approach. London: Sage.
Google Scholar
Kakabadse, A, Kakabadse, N (7 2014) The Company Secretary: Building Trust Through Governance. ICSA and Henley Business School, University of Reading. Available at: http://wwww.geniusmethods.com (accessed 8 January 2017).
Google Scholar
Kezar, A, Eckel, PD (2004) Meeting today’s governance challenges: a synthesis of the literature and examination of a future agenda for scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education 75(4): 371399.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kezar, A (2006) Rethinking public higher education boards performance: results of a national study of governing boards in the united states. The Journal of Higher Education 77(6): 9681008.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kogan, M, Hanney, S (2000) Reforming Higher Education. Higher Education Policy Series 50. London and Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Google Scholar
King, R (2009) Governing Universities Globally: Organizations, Regulation and Rankings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar | Crossref
King, N, Horrocks, C (2010) Interviews in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Lambert, R (12 2003) Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration. Final Report. Available at: http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/lambert_review_business_university_collab.thm (accessed 8 January 2017).
Google Scholar
Le Blanc, R, Schwartz, M (2007) The black box of board process: gaining access to a difficult subject. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15: 843851.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Llewellyn, D (2007) The Role and Influence of the Secretary In Relation to Governing Bodies in Higher Education. Available at: http://opus.bath.ac.uk/22037 (accessed 8 January 2017).
Google Scholar
Llewellyn, D (2009) The role and influence of the Secretary in UK Higher Education Governing Bodies. Final Summary Report. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. Available at: https:/www.lfhe.ac.uk/researchhub (accessed 8 January 2017).
Google Scholar
Lock, A, Strong, T (2010) Social Constructionism: Sources and Stirrings in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
McNay, I (2002) Governance and decision-making in smaller colleges. Higher Education Quarterly 56(3): 303315.
Google Scholar | Crossref
McNay, I (1999) Evaluation of the Work of the Governing Body. London: University of Greenwich.
Google Scholar
McNulty, T, Roberts, J, Stiles, P (2005) Undertaking governance reform and research: further reflections on the Higgs review. British Journal of Management 16(Special Issue): 99107.
Google Scholar | Crossref
McNulty, T (2013) Process matters: understanding board behaviour and effectiveness. In: Wright, M, Siegal, DS, Keasey, K, Filatotchev, I (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163176.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Marginson, S (1997) Steering from a distance: power relations in Australian higher education. Higher Education 34(1): 6380.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mason, J (2002) Qualitative Researching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Massy, W (2010) Managerial and political strategies for managing accountability. In: Stensaker, B, Harvey, L (eds) Accountability in Higher Education: Global Perspectives on Trust and Power. London, New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Morgan, J (2012) Governance track for man who helped privatise the UK’s railways. Times Higher Education 24 5.
Google Scholar
Neave, G, Vught van, F (1991) Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe (ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Google Scholar
Novick, G (2008) Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing and Health 31(4): 391398.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Opdenakker, R (2006) Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Research 7(4): Article 11.
Google Scholar | Medline
Pettigrew, A, McNulty, T (1995) Power and influence in and around the boardroom. Human Relations 48(5): 845873.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Pye, A (2002) Corporate directing: governing, strategizing and leading in action. Corporate Governance: An International Review 10(3): 153162.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ranson, S (2003) Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy 18(5): 459480.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rytmeister, CR (2009) Governing university strategy: perceptions and practice of governance and management roles. Tertiary Education and Management 15(2): 137156.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Saldaña, J (2013) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oals, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Schofield, A (2006) Getting to Grips with Being a Governor. Making Sense of Governance in Higher Education. A Programme for Members of Governing Bodies in Universities and Colleges. London: SCOP Ltd.
Google Scholar
Schofield, A (1 2009) What is an Effective and High Performing Governing Body in UK Higher Education? Available at: http://www.lfhe.ac.uk/en/governance-new/index.cfm
Google Scholar
Searle, JR (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin Books.
Google Scholar
Shattock, M (2006) Managing Good Governance in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Sonnenfeld, J (2004) Good governance and the misleading myths of bad metrics. Academy of Management Executive 18(1): 108113.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Strauss, A, Corbin, J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
The Further and Higher Education Act (1992) Available at: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/13/contents (accessed 8 January 2017).
Google Scholar
The National Committee of Enquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE) Dearing, R (1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe (accessed 8 January 2017).
Google Scholar
Thomas, SP, Pollio, HR (2002) Listening to Patients. A Phenomenological Approach to Nursing Research and Practice. New York: Springer.
Google Scholar
Tricker, B (2009) Corporate Governance. Principles, Policies and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Trowler, P, Saunders, M, Bamber, V (eds) (2012) Tribes and Territories in the 21st-Century: Rethinking the Significance of Disciplines in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EMA-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0