Quality education is of major public and private interest and, understandably, considerable effort is paid to the quality of schools and improvement of the level of education in society. Many governments recognize the limitations of centralized policy in motivating school improvement and turn to ‘network governance’ to coordinate school systems. Relying on school-to-school collaboration to coordinate education systems has far-reaching consequences for existing accountability structures, most of which were developed to support hierarchical control of individual school quality. This paper reflects on the accountability of networks of schools and on appropriate arrangements to improve the effectiveness of partnerships; our contribution starts with unpicking the question of ‘who is accountable to whom and for what’ in a network of schools? We discuss some common problems in the accountability of networks and describe frameworks to evaluate network-level outcomes and functioning. Examples from the accountability of Multi-Academy Trusts in England are included to contextualize our contribution.

Aviram, A (2003) Regulation by networks. Brigham young university law review (4): 11791238. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2181&context=lawreview (accessed November 2015).
Google Scholar
Burgess (2016) Blog Academy governance. Available at: https://myacademies.org.uk/pages/219/blog/ (accessed May 2016).
Google Scholar
Burns, T, Köster, F (2016) Governing Education in a Complex World. Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar
Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education (CUREE) (2005) Systematic Research Review: The Impact of Networks on Pupils, Practitioners, Organisations and the Communities They Serve. Nottingham, UK: National College. Available at: http://www.curee.co.uk/files/publication/1219841354/Impact_of_Networks_Leaflet.pdf (accessed 15 July 2017).
Google Scholar
Department for Education (2016) Educational Excellence Everywhere, Cm 9230. London, UK: Department for Education.
Google Scholar
Díaz-Gibson, J, Civís-Zaragoza, M, Guàrdia-Olmos, J (2014) Strengthening education through collaborative networks: Leading the cultural change. School Leadership & Management 34(2): 179200.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ehren, MCM, Janssens, FJG, Brown, M, McNamara, G, O'Hara, J, Shevlin, P (2017) Evaluation and decentralised governance: the case of inspections in polycentric education systems. Journal of Educational Change. Epub ahead of print 19 April 2017.
Google Scholar
Gray, A, Jenkins, B, Leeuw, F (2003) Collaborative government and evaluation: The implications of a new policy instrument. In: Gray, A, Jenkins, B, Leeuw, F, Mayne, J (eds) Collaboration in Public Services: The Challenge for Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. 129.
Google Scholar
Greany, T, Ehren, MCM (2016) Written evidence to Education Select Committee inquiry into the performance, accountability and governance of Multi-Academy Trusts. Available at: http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/education-committee/multiacademy-trusts/written/32050.html (accessed December 2016)
Google Scholar
Hill, R (2008) Chain Reactions. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
Google Scholar
Hill, R (2013) Written evidence to inquiry to Academies Commission. Available at: https://roberthilleducationblog.com/academy-chains/ (accessed December 2016).
Google Scholar
Hooge, E, Burns, T, Wilkoszewski, H (2012) Looking beyond the numbers: Stakeholders and multiple school accountability. OECD Education Working Papers 28(85): 126.
Google Scholar
Hutchings, M, Francis, B, de Vries, R (2014) Chain Effects: The Impact of Academy Chains on Low Income Students. London: The Sutton Trust.
Google Scholar
Janssens, FJ, Ehren, MCM (2016) Toward a model of school inspections in a polycentric system. Evaluation and Program Planning 56(1): 8898
Google Scholar | Crossref
Klijn, EH, Edelenbos, J, Steijn, B (2010) Trust in governance networks; its impact and outcomes. Administration and Society 42(2): 193221.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Klijn, EJ, Koppejan, JFM (2014) Accountable networks. In: Bovens, M, Goodin, M, Schillemans, T (eds) The Oxford handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: OUP Oxford, pp. 242258.
Google Scholar
Mandell, M, Keast, R (2007) Evaluating network arrangements: Toward revised performance measures. Public Performance & Management Review 30(4): 574597.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mayne, J (2003) Results-based governance: Collaborating for outcomes. In: Gray, A, Jenkins, B, Leeuw, F, Mayne, J (eds) Collaboration in Public Services: The Challenge for Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 155179.
Google Scholar
Mayne, J, Rieper, O (2003) Collaborating for public service quality: The implications for evaluation. In: Gray, A, Jenkins, B, Leeuw, F, Mayne, J (eds) Collaboration in Public Services: The Challenge for Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar
Mayne, J, Wileman, T, Leeuw, F (2003) Networks and partnering arrangements: New challenges for evaluation and auditing. In: Gray, A, Jenkins, B, Leeuw, F, Mayne, J (eds) Collaboration in Public Services: The Challenge for Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 2951.
Google Scholar
Meuleman, L (2008) Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets: The Feasibility of Designing and Managing Governance Style Combinations. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Google Scholar
Muijs, D, Mel, W, Mel, A (2010) Why network? theoretical perspectives on networking and collaboration between schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21(1): 526.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Popp, J, MacKean, G, Casebeer, A, Milward, HB, Lindstrom, R (2013) Inter-organizational Networks: A Critical Review of the Literature to Inform practice. Available at: http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/Inter-Organizational%20Networks_0.pdf (accessed November 2016).
Google Scholar
Provan, K, Kenis, P (2008) Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(2): 229252.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schwartz, R (2003) The politics of evaluating government collaboration with the Third Sector. In: Gray, A, Jenkins, B, Leeuw, F, Mayne, J (eds) Collaboration in Public Services: The Challenge for Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Google Scholar
Sydow, J (2004) Network development by means of network evaluation? Explorative insights from a case in the financial services industry. Human Relations 57(2): 201220.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Theisens, H (2012) Governance in Interessante Tijden, Een Essay. [Governance in interesting times; an essay]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Haagse Hogeschool.
Google Scholar
West, M (2010) School-to-school cooperation as a strategy for improving student outcomes in challenging contexts. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21(1): 93112.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

EMA-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in: