Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Free access
Meeting Report
First published online July 2, 2018

Process Consent and Research with Older Persons Living with Dementia

Abstract

There is always a debate around consent in the context of research. Given the expansion of different approaches to qualitative research within dementia care, there is increasing consideration around consent in this context; particularly in research concerning the experiences of living with dementia and the care of persons with dementia. Specifically there is a drive to directly involve persons with dementia as they offer specific expertise concerning living with dementia. Additionally, capacity legislation strengthens the case for ensuring that persons with dementia are actively enabled to make their own decisions for as long as possible. This paper discusses an approach and method that can enable more persons who are living with dementia to participate in some types of research should they want to. Currently, most researchers rely on an extension of the traditional competency-based informed consent method and/or proxy consent or assent. However, related to the development of so-called person-centred and participatory research in dementia, there are now a number of academic publications on approaches and practical methods of ‘inclusionary’ consent. This paper considers the broader contextual influences on inclusionary consent and outlines the key aspects of such approaches based on the development of one specific method for including persons with dementia in consent processes. The method is based on the premise that, for persons with a dementia, informed consent becomes increasingly redundant and consequently exclusionary to them as persons. And even where capacity is said to no longer exist, persons with dementia are often able to make choices and make known their preferences about participating in research where the consent process is made specifically dementia-sensitive. Ethics committees can facilitate researchers both by supporting them when they need to and want to include persons with dementia in gerontological research and by challenging them to ensure that participation is genuine and starts with process consent.

References

1. Cutliffe J, Ramcharan P. Levelling the playing field? Exploring the merits of the ethics-as-process approach for judging qualitative research proposals. Qual Hlth Res 2002; 12(7): 1000–1010.
2. Reed J, Weiner R, Cook G. Partnership research with older people - moving towards making the rhetoric a reality. J Clin Nurs 2004; 13(s1):3–10.
3. Bravo G, Paquet M, Dubois MF. Opinions regarding who should consent to research on behalf of an older adult suffering dementia. Dementia: Int J Soc Res Pract 2003; 2(1): 49–65.
4. Gillies BA. A memory like clockwork: accounts of living through dementia. Ageing Ment Hlth 2002, 4(4): 366–374.
5. Downs M. The emergence of the person in dementia research. Aging Soc 1997; 17: 597–607.
6. Cotrell V, Schulz R. The perspective of the patient with Alzheimer's disease: a neglected dimension of dementia research. Gerontol Soc Amer 1993, 33(2): 205–211.
7. Dewing J. From ritual to relationship: a person centred approach to consent in qualitative research with older people who have a dementia. Dementia: Int J Soc Res Pract 2002; 1(2): 156–171.
8. Dewing J. Wandering into the future: reconceptualising wandering? Int J Older Peoples Nurs 2006; 1(4): 239–249.
9. Beck C, Shue V. Surrogate Decision-Making and Related Issues. Alz Dis Assoc Dis 2003; 17 suppl 1: S12–S16.
10. Vass AA, Minardi H, Ward R, Aggarwal N, Garfield C, Cybyk B. Research into communication patterns and consequences for effective care of people with Alzheimer's and their carers. Dementia: Int J Soc Res Pract 2003; 2(1): 21–48.
11. Dresser R. Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Rutgers Law Rev 1994; 46(92): 609–719.
12. Martin RJ, Gwther LP, Whitehouse PJ. Special care unit research: ethical issues. Alz Dis Assoc Dis 1994; 8: S360–367.
13. Post SG. The Moral Challenge of Alzheimer's disease. Baltimore:John Hopkins University, 1995.
14. Cooper MM. Reconceptualising nursing ethics. IMAGE Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice 1990; 4(3): 209–221.
15. Spielman K. Demented residents rights to refuse treatment. Clinical Excellence for Nurse Practitioners 1997; 1(6): 376–381.
16. Gilhooly M. Ethical debate and developments in the law between 1984 and 2004. Generations Rev 2005; 15(1): 15–19.
17. Kitwood T. Concern for others. London:Routledge, 1990.
18. Kitwood T. Dementia reconsidered: the person comes first. Buckingham:Open University Press, 1997.
19. Wilson G. Conceptual frameworks and emancipatory research in social gerontology. Ageing Soc 2001; 21: 471–487.
20. Post SG. Alzheimer's disease and the ‘then’ self. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 1995; 5(4): 307–321.
21. Gilligan C. In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1982.
22. Goldsmith M. Hearing the voices of persons with dementia: opportunities and obstacles. London:Jessica Kingsley, 1996.
23. Tappen JM, Willliams C, Fishman S, Touhy T. Persistence of self in advanced Alzheimer's disease. IMAGE Journal of Nursing Scholarship 1999; 31(2): 121–125.
24. Dworkin G. Autonomy and behaviour control. Hastings Centre Report 1976; 6(1): 23–28.
25. Bamford C, Bruce E. Defining the outcomes of community care: the perspectives of older persons with dementia and their carers. Ageing and Society 2000; 20: 543–570.
26. Mills MA. Narrative identity and dementia. A study of autobiographical memories and emotions. Aldershot:Ashgate, 1998.
27. Sabat SR. Voices of Alzheimer's disease sufferers: a call for treatment based on personhood. J Clin Ethic 1998; 9(1): 35–48.
28. Moody HR. Issues of equity in the selection of subjects for experimental research in senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type. In Melnick VL, Dubler NN (eds) Alzheimer's dilemmas and clinical research. Clifton New Jersey:Humana Press, 1985.
29. Dewing J, Pritchard E. Including the older person with a dementia in practice development. Chapter 8: in McCormack, Garbett & Manley: Perspectives on practice development in nursing. Oxford:Blackwells, 2004.
30. Sachs GA. Advance consent for dementia research. Alz Dis Assoc Dis 1994; 8 Suppl 4: 19–27.
31. Barr B, Closs J, Briggs M. Pain assessment in nursing home residents with varying degrees of cognitive impairment: frequently asked questions, 2002. At http://www.mhilli.org/dri/painfaq.htm (last accessed 13 April 2008).
32. Grout G. Negotiated consent in research. Nursing Older People 2004; 16(4): 18–20.
33. Post SG. Alzheimer's disease ethics and the progression of dementia. Clin Geriatr Med 1994; 10(2): 379–394.
34. Widdershoven GAM, Berghmans R. Advance directives in dementia care: from instructions to instruments. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 44: 179–186.
35. Pritchard EJ, Dewing J. A multi-method evaluation of an independent dementia service and its approach. Ageing Mental Hlth 2001; 5(1): 63–72.
36. Walker E, Dewar B, Dewing J, Pritchard E. An evaluation of day services from the perspectives of major stakeholders. Edinburgh:Queen Margaret's University, 2001.
37. Donnelly J. Can adults with cognitive impairment consent to take part in research. J Wound Care 2004; 13(7): 257–262.
38. Dewing J. Participatory research: a method for process consent with persons who have dementia. Dementia: Int J Soc Res Pract 2007; 6(1): 11–25.
39. McCormack B, Dewing J. (2008) The older persons services national practice development programme. At http://www.ncnm.ie/opsnpdp/index.asp (last accessed 13 April 2008).
40. Nunner-Winkler G. Two moralities? A critical discussion of an ethic of care and responsibility versus an ethic of justice and rights. In Larrabee MJ (ed) An ethic of care. Feminist and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London:Routledge, 1993.
41. Lyman K. Living with Alzheimer's disease: the creation of meaning among persons with dementia. J Clin Ethic 1998; 9(1): 49–57.
42. Qureshi H, Bamford C, Nicholas E, Patmore C, Harris JC. Outcomes in social care practice: developing an outcome in care management and use surveys. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, 2000.
43. Nolan M, Ryan T, Enderby P, Reid D. Towards a more inclusive vision of dementia care and research. Dementia: Int J Soc Res Pract 2002; 1(2): 193–212.
44. Botes A. Ethics of justice and ethics of care. Adv J Nurs 2002; 32(5): 1071–1075.
45. McCormack B. Researching nursing practice: does person-centredness matter? Nursing-Philosophy 2003; 4(3): 79–88.
46. Lloyd L. Mortality and morality: ageing and the ethics of care. Ageing S 2004; 24: 235–256.
47. Crisp J. Towards a partnership in maintaining personhood. Chapter 5 in Adams T, Clarke C (eds) Dementia care: developing partnerships in practice. London:Balliere Tindall, 1999.
48. Bartlett H, Martin W. Ethical issues in dementia care research. In Wilkinson H (ed). The perspectives of people with dementia: research methods and motivations. London:Jessica Kingsley, 2002.
49. Damasio A. The feeling of what happens: body emotion and the making of consciousness. London:Vintage, 2000.
50. Butterworth C. Ongoing consent to care for older people in care homes. Nurs Stand 2005; 19(20): 40–45.
51. Knight R. Interviewing people with dementia using video. J Dement Care 2005; May/June: 31–35.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the SAGE Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: July 2, 2018
Issue published: June 2008

Rights and permissions

© 2008 The Association of Research Ethics Committees.
Request permissions for this article.

History

Issue published: June 2008
Published online: July 2, 2018

Authors

Affiliations

Jan Dewing
Independent Consultant Nurse (Jan Dewing Consultancy)
Honorary Research Fellow Institute of Nursing Research University of Ulster; Visiting Fellow Northumbria University; Professorial Fellow University of Wollongong NSW Australia

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Research Ethics.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1262

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 96

  1. Regulating the disenfranchised: Reciprocity & resistance under the Men...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. One Step at a Time: Evaluation of a Step-By-Step Recipe Tool Designed ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Young onset dementia: implications for employment and finances
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  4. Just and inclusive end-of-life decision-making for long-term care home...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Fragile storytelling: Methodological considerations when conducting et...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Volume, scope, and consideration of ethical issues in Indigenous cogni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  7. Taking time: The temporal politics of dementia, care and support in th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. How context influences person-centred practice: a critical-creative ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. ‘Knocking at the door of humanity’: using co-creation and community-ba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Temporal Belonging: Loss of Time and Fragile Attempts to Belong with A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The (in)accuracies of floating leaves: How people with varying experie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  12. “Acting ethically is down to you” applying ethical protocols in qualit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Preserving client autonomy when guiding medicine taking in telehomecar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  14. Psychodrama with persons with dementia on zoom: Proof of concept
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  15. Enhancing engagement in meaningful occupation in a dementia town: A qu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  16. A qualitative exploration of living with dementia in supported living ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. An intergenerational playgroup in an Australian residential aged‐care ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Music‐making in the community with people living with dementia and car...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. ‘Guid times wi the bad times’: The meanings and experiences of befrien...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  20. Power, Authority, and Voice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. A Multiple Stakeholder Perspective on the Impact of COVID-19 on Dement...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Development of a Home-Based Stress Management Toolkit for Dementia Car...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. In Their Own Words: How COVID-19 Has Impacted the Well-Being of Person...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Self-reported benefits for care partners of attending a person-centred...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. “It's just so important that people's voices are heard”: The dementia ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Remembering the past, enhancing the present and sharing the future: a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Older adult and family caregiver preferences for emergency department ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Moments of meaning: Enacted narratives of occupational engagement with...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Partnering with older people as peer researchers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. “You’re Part of Us and We’re Happy to Have You Here”: Practices of Soc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Health promotion initiative: A dementia-friendly local community in Sw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  32. ‘You come because it is an interesting place’: The impact of attending...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  33. People living with dementia and their family carers’ adherence to home...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  34. The importance of living well now and relationships: A qualitative stu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  35. Development of an ethical roadmap
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Missed Nursing Care Among Patients With Dementia During Hospitalizatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. How nurses can support the inclusion in research of older people who l...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Beyond the shrinking world: dementia, localisation and neighbourhood
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. ‘It's our pleasure, we count cars here’: an exploration of the ‘neighb...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Experiences of rural life among community-dwelling older men with deme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  41. Patient and informal carer experience of hip fracture: a qualitative s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Intensive home care supports, informal care and private provision for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  43. ‘Unlocking the door to being there’: The contribution of creative faci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  44. Co-creating Design Opportunities for Social Technology in the Context ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Nurses’ provisions for self-determination in residents with cognitive ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Developing a Management Guide (the DemPower App) for Couples Where One...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Power, Authority, and Voice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Exploring the Effects of a Golf Program on Psychological and Social We...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Focusing on Emotional and Social Intelligence Stimulation of People Wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodologi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Test-retest reliability of the short version of the everyday technolog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Exploring the ‘active mechanisms’ for engaging rural-dwelling older me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. The perceived and observed needs of patients with dementia admitted to...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  54. The Impact of Implementing a Namaste Care Intervention in UK Care Home...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Couples’ experiences of using DemPower in everyday life
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Older people's perspectives on living in integrated housing and care s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Ethical and legal aspects of research involving older people with cogn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Adherence to the Class-Based Component of a Tai Chi Exercise Intervent...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Beyond Façade: Home Making and Truthfulness in Dementia Care
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. A systematic review of electronic assistive technology within supporti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  61. Hospital nurse staffing and staff–patient interactions: an observation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Effectively including the voice of residents in care home design
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Relational ethics in palliative care research: including a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  64. Support Needs and Expectations of People Living with Dementia and Thei...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Acceptability of a Dyadic Tai Chi Intervention for Older People Living...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. ‘Well I’m still the Diva!’ Enabling people with dementia to express th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  67. Partizipation von Menschen mit Demenz fördert ihre Gesundheit
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Researching with People with Dementia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Using longitudinal qualitative research to explore extra care housing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Intensive home care packages for people with dementia: a realist evalu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Participation in a trial in the emergency situation: a qualitative stu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard dressings for adults w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. Consent recommendations for research and international data sharing in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Living Life and Doing Things Together: Collaborative Research With Cou...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  75. Implementing the Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Involving people with dementia in developing an interactive web tool f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Art, music, story: The evaluation of a person-centred arts in health p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Review: Evaluating the effects of a physical activity on agitation and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Developing best practice guidelines for designing living environments ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Designing and Implementing a Home-Based Couple Management Guide for Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. The development of service user-led recommendations for health and soc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Understanding patient and relative/carer experience of hip fracture in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Using Experience-based Co-design with older patients, their families a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Researching with People with Dementia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Reflections on the Use of Visual Methods in a Qualitative Study of Dom...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Confidentiality in participatory research: Challenges from one study
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  87. What is the current state of care for older people with dementia in ge...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  88. Does Digital Gaming Enable Healthy Aging for Community-Dwelling People...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. A Novel Visual Method for Studying Complex Health Transitions for Olde...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Advance directives in dementia research: The opinions and arguments of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. People with dementia and the hospital environment: the view of patient...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Actively involving people with dementia in qualitative research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.