Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 27, 2020

Relational Goes Beyond Interpersonal: The Development of Empathy in the Context of Culture

Abstract

It is clear a relational approach to the study of empathy is gaining traction across multiple disciplines. Both commentaries on “A Relational Framework for Integrating the Study of Empathy in Children and Adults” underscored the need to expand the relational framework of empathy to incorporate the broader social and cultural context in which children and adults live. In the present reply we outline some specific ways that culture can inform the study of empathy in interpersonal contexts. We focus on how culture and context shape the meaning of empathy and its expression and highlight how a within-culture approach to the study of empathy will advance our understanding of this nebulous construct.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Atkins D., Uskul A. K., Cooper N. R. (2016). Culture shapes empathic responses to physical and social pain. Emotion, 16, 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000162
Bornstein M. H., Cheah C. S. L. (2006). The place of “culture and parenting” in the ecological contextual perspective on developmental science. In Rubin K. H., Chung O. B. (Eds.), Parenting beliefs, behaviors, and parent–child relations: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Carlo G., Roesch S. C., Knight G. P., Koller S. H. (2001). Between- or within-culture variation?: Culture group as a moderator of the relations between individual differences and resource allocation preferences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(01)00094-6
Goetz J., Peng K. (2018). Sympathy and responses to suffering: Similarity and variation in China and the United States. Emotion, 19, 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000443
Halpern J. (2001). From detached concern to empathy: Humanizing medical practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hollan D. (2020). Comment: The “relational approach” to empathy in ethnographic perspective. Emotion Review, 12, 291–292.
Hollan D., Throop C. J. (2011). The anthropology of empathy: Introduction. In Hollan D. W., Throop C. J. (Eds.), The anthropology of empathy: Experiencing the lives of others in Pacific societies (pp. 1–25). Oxford, UK: Berghahn.
Kupetz M. (2014). Empathy displays as interactional achievements—Multimodal and sequential aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 4–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.006
Kupetz M. (2019). Embodying empathy in everyday and institutional settings: On the negotiation of resources, rights and responsibilities in comforting actions. In Reber E., Gerhardt C. (Eds.), Embodied activities in face-to-face and mediated settings: Social encounters in time and space (pp. 329–367). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kupetz M. (2020). Comment on “A Relational Framework for Integrating the Study of Empathy in Children and Adults”: A conversation analytic perspective. Emotion Review, 12, 293–294.
Lougheed J. P., Main A., Helm J. L. (2020). Mother–adolescent emotion dynamics during conflicts: Associations with perspective taking. Journal of Family Psychology. Advance online publication.
Main A. (2019). Parenting and prosocial/moral development in Asian and Asian immigrants to the U.S. In Laible D. J., Carlo G., Walker L. M. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of parenting and moral development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Main A., Walle E. A., Kho C., Halpern J. (2017). The interpersonal functions of empathy: A relational perspective. Emotion Review, 9, 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669440
Main A., Zhou Q., Liew J., Lee C. (2017). Prosocial tendencies in Chinese American children from immigrant families: Associations with sociodemographic characteristics and psychosocial adjustment. Social Development, 26, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12182
Matsumoto D. (2007). Culture, context, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 75, 1285–1319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00476.x
Trommsdorff G., Friedlmeier W., Mayer B. (2007). Sympathy, distress, and prosocial behavior of preschool children in four cultures. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407076441
Van Lissa C. J., Hawk S. T., de Wied M., Koot H. M., van Lier P., Meeus W. (2014). The longitudinal interplay of affective and cognitive empathy within and between adolescents and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1219–1225. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035050

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 27, 2020
Issue published: October 2020

Keywords

  1. culture
  2. empathy
  3. relational

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2020.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Alexandra Main
Psychological Sciences, University of California – Merced, USA
Carmen Kho
Psychological Sciences, University of California – Merced, USA

Notes

Alexandra Main, Psychological Sciences, University of California – Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Emotion Review.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 650

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 2 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 4

  1. Why We Should Reject the Restrictive Isomorphic Matching Definition of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Authors Reply: Empathy and Creativity: Dangers of the Methodological T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Parents’ Empathic Accuracy: Associations With Type 1 Diabetes Manageme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Empathic Psychology: A Code of Risk Prevention and Control for Behavio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

ISRE members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

ISRE members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text