Responsibility to Protect goes to China: An interpretivist analysis of how China’s coexistence policy made it a Responsibility to Protect insider

First Published January 21, 2020 Research Article

The article offers an interpretivist analysis of China’s coexistence approach to developing the Responsibility to Protect norm concerning atrocity crimes against civilians. The English school’s concept of great power legitimacy through coexistence is a central characteristic of its international society description of the international realm. The article uses an interpretivist approach to show how China’s coexistence foreign policy tradition was challenged by the liberal internationalist agenda of a Responsibility to Protect norm on atrocity crimes against civilians. The emergence of an alternative Chinese Responsibility to Protect concept coupling a state-centric and a people-centric approach with its focus on political and economic capacity-building of existing domestic institutions allowed China to position itself as a legitimate lifeline of liberal international institutions. The article shows how an illiberal state can become a prominent upholder of central institutions of the post-World War II liberal international order.

Ainley, K (2015) The responsibility to protect and the International Criminal Court: Counteracting the crisis. International Affairs 91(1): 3754.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bellamy, AJ (2010) The responsibility to protect – Five years on. Ethics and International Affairs 24(2): 143169.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bevir, M, Hall, I (2020) Interpreting the English School: History, Science and Philosophy. Journal of International Political Theory. Epub ahead of print 13 January 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1755088219898884.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bull, H (1983) 1983–84 Hagey Lectures: Justice in International Relations. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Waterloo University Press.
Google Scholar
Bull, H (1995 [1977]) The Anarchical Society: A Study of World Order in World Politics. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Butterfield, H (1972) Morality and an international order. In: Porter, B (ed.) The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics 1919–1969. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 336357.
Google Scholar
Buzan, B (2010) China in international society: Is ‘peaceful rise’ possible? The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3(1): 536.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Daiss, T (2019) China-South Sudan oil deal raises red flags. Oilprice.com, 8 April. Available at: https://oilprice.com/Geopolitics/Africa/China-South-Sudan-Oil-Deal-Raises-Red-Flags.html (accessed 12 July 2019).
Google Scholar
Duchâtel, M, Gowan, R, Rapnouil, ML (2016) Into Africa: China’s global security shift. Policy brief, European Council on Foreign Relations, London.
Google Scholar
Dunne, T (2017) Ordering the world? Liberal internationalism in theory and practice. In: The International Studies Association’s 58th annual convention, Baltimore, MD, 22–25 February.
Google Scholar
Dunne, T, Teitt, S (2015) Contested intervention: China, India, and the responsibility to protect. Global Governance 21(3): 371391.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Foot, R (2014) ‘Doing some things’ in the Xi Jinping era: The United Nations as China’s venue of choice. International Affairs 90(5): 10851100.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Foot, R (2015) The state, development, and humanitarianism: China’s shaping of the trajectory of the R2P. In: Bellamy, AJ, Dunne, T (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 932947.
Google Scholar
Foot, R (2017) Xi Jinping’s China and the international human rights protection regime. In: The International Studies Association’s 58th annual convention, Baltimore, MD, 22–25 February.
Google Scholar
Global Times (2019) UN hails ratification of human rights treaties by South Sudan parliament. Global Times, 7 June. Available at: http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1153459.shtml (accessed 14 July 2019).
Google Scholar
Hruby, D (2018) China used to stay out of other nations’ politics. But not here. The Washington Post, 26 July. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/07/26/china-africa-2/?utm_term=.4c26cfdba992 (accessed 12 July 2019).
Google Scholar
Ikenberry, GJ (2018) The end of liberal international order? International Affairs 94(1): 723.
Google Scholar | Crossref
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) (2001) The responsibility to protect. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Available at: http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf (accessed 1 March 2018).
Google Scholar
International Crisis Group (2017) China’s foreign policy experiment in South Sudan. Report no. 288, 10 July. Available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/horn-africa/south-sudan/288-china-s-foreign-policy-experiment-south-sudan (accessed 12 July 2019).
Google Scholar
Jackson, R (2010) War perils in the responsibility to protect. Global Responsibility to Protect 2: 315319.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Khong, YF (2019) Power as prestige in world politics. International Affairs 95(1): 119142.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kotkin, S (2018) Realist world: The players change, but the game remains. Foreign Affairs 97(4): 1015.
Google Scholar
Lee, J (2018) Understanding authoritarian resilience and countering autocracy promotion in Asia. Asia Policy 13(4): 99122.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Linklater, A (1992) What is a good international citizen? In: Keal, P (ed.) Ethics and Foreign Policy. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Allen & Unwin, pp. 2143.
Google Scholar
Manning, CAW (1975) The Nature of International Society. London: Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ministry of External Affairs (1959) Notes: Memoranda and letter exchanged and agreements signed between the Governments of India and China, 1954–9. White paper, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi, India.
Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China (2014) Foreign ministry spokesperson Hong Lei’s regular press conference on June 3, 2014, 3 June. Available at: http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/t1161810.shtml (accessed 18 November 2016).
Google Scholar
Ministry of National Defense of the People’s Republic of China (2014) Defense Ministry’s regular press conference on Sep. 25, 2014, 25 September. Available at: http://eng.mod.gov.cn/Press/2014-09/25/content_4539896.htm (accessed 18 November 2016).
Google Scholar
Morris, J (2005) Normative innovation and the great powers. In: Bellamy, AJ (ed.) International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265281.
Google Scholar
Moyn, S (2010) The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.
Google Scholar
Navari, C (2020) The English school and the classical approach: Between modernism and interpretivism. Journal of International Political Theory.
Google Scholar
Northedge, FS (1976) The International Political System. London: Faber & Faber.
Google Scholar
O’Hagan, J (2020) Shape shifting: Civilizational discourse and the analysis of cross-cultural interaction in the constitution of international society. Journal of International Political Theory.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Pauley, L (2018) China takes the lead in UN peacekeeping. The Diplomat, 17 April. Available at: https://thediplomat.com/2018/04/china-takes-the-lead-in-un-peacekeeping/ (accessed 14 July 2019).
Google Scholar
Preamble (1982) Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, 4 December. Available at: http://english.people.com.cn/constitution/constitution.html (accessed 12 July 2018).
Google Scholar
Qin, Y (2015) Quoted in Fu Y (2015) Under the same roof: China’s view of global order. The World Post, 11 November. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/fu-ying/china-global-order_b_8537918.html (accessed 19 July 2018).
Google Scholar
Tsou, T, Halperin, MH (1965) Mao Tse-Tung’s revolutionary strategy and Peking’s international behaviour. American Political Science Review 59(1): 8099.
Google Scholar | Crossref
United Nations (UN) (2003) United Nations weapons inspectors report to Security Council on progress in disarmament of Iraq, Press release SC/7682, 7 March. Available at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2003/sc7682.doc.htm (accessed 11 July 2019).
Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (2006) More progress needed to ensure better protection for civilians in armed conflict, Security Council told, Press release SC/8763, 28 June. Available at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2006/sc8763.doc.htm (accessed 11 July 2019).
Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (2011) Security Council approves ‘no-fly zone’ over Libya, authorizing ‘all necessary measures’ to protect civilians, by vote of 10 in favour with 5 abstentions, Press release SC/10200, 17 March. Available at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2011/sc10200.doc.htm (accessed 12 July 2019).
Google Scholar
United Nations (UN) (2018) Adopting resolution 2428 (2018), Security Council extends sanctions on South Sudan, Press release SC/13421, 13 July. Available at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/sc13421.doc.htm (accessed 14 July 2019).
Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2005) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 16 September 2005, A/RES/60/1, para. 139. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_60_1.pdf (accessed 17 July 2018).
Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly (2009) Implementing the responsibility to protect. Report of the Secretary-General, A/63/677, 12 January. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4989924d2.html (accessed 17 July 2018).
Google Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council (2019) Report of the commission on human rights in South Sudan, A/HRC/40/69, 12 March. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session40/Documents/A_HRC_40_69.docx (accessed 14 July 2019).
Google Scholar
United Nations Peacekeeping (2019) China, 31 May. Available at: https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/china (accessed 12 July 2019).
Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) (2006a) Resolution 1674, S/RES/1674, 28 April. Available at: https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/S-Res-1674%20on%20protection%20civilians%20in%20armed%20conflict%20(28Apr06).pdf (accessed 17 July 2018).
Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) (2006b) Resolution 1706, S/RES/1706, 31 August. Available at: https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7b65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7d/CAR%20SRES1706.pdf (accessed 17 July 2018).
Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) (2006c) 5519th meeting, S/PV.5519, 31 August. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/PV.5519 (accessed 17 July 2018).
Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) (2011a) Resolution 1973 (2011), S/RES/1973 (2011). Available at: https://www.undocs.org/S/RES/1973%20(2011) (accessed 1 March 2018).
Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) (2011b) Resolution 1996 (2011), S/RES/1996 (2011). Available at: https://daccessods.un.org/TMP/7189860.93997955.html (accessed 18 November 2016).
Google Scholar
Watson, A (1982) Diplomacy: The dialogue between States. London: Methuen.
Google Scholar
Welsh, J (2011) A normative case for pluralism: Reassessing Vincent’s views on humanitarian intervention. International Affairs 87(5): 11931204.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Welsh, J (2014) What’s next for R2P? Dr. Jennifer Welsh on the responsibility to protect. News briefs, The Hague Institute for Global Justice, 27 October. Available at: http://www.thehagueinstituteforglobaljustice.org/latest-insights/latest-insights/news-brief/whats-next-for-r2p-dr-jennifer-welsh-on-the-responsibility-to-protect/ (accessed 14 July 2019).
Google Scholar
Wheeler, N (2001) Reflections on the legality and legitimacy of NATO’s intervention in Kosovo. In: Booth, K (ed.) The Kosovo Tragedy: The Human Rights Dimension. Abingdon: Frank Cass, pp. 145163.
Google Scholar
Wheeler, N, Dunne, T (1998) Good international citizenship: A third way for British foreign policy? International Affairs 74(4): 847870.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wight, M (1986) Power Politics. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Google Scholar
Williams, J (2006) The Ethics of Territorial Borders: Drawing Lines in the Shifting Sand. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zala, B (2020) Interpreting great power rights in international society: Debating China’s right to a sphere of influence. Journal of International Political Theory.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Zhang, X (2011) China recognizes independence of South Sudan. China Daily, 9 July. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2011-07/09/content_12869896.htm (accessed 18 November 2016).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y (2016) China and liberal hierarchies in global international society: Power and negotiation for normative change. International Affairs 92(4): 795816.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zhong, S (2012) Regime change should not be determined by external forces. People’s Daily, 18 July. Available at: http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90777/7879699.html (accessed 1 March 2018).
Google Scholar
Zhu, Y (2018) Canadian ambassador to South Sudan hails Chinese peacekeepers. People’s Daily, 5 February. Available at: http://en.people.cn/n3/2018/0205/c90000-9423691.html (accessed 15 July 2019).
Google Scholar
Zongze, R (2012) Responsible protection: Building a safer world. China International Studies 34 (reprinted at China Institute of International Studies, Beijing, China). Available at: http://www.ciis.org.cn/english/2012-06/15/content_5090912.htm (accessed 18 July 2018).
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

IPT-article-ppv for GBP29.00
IPT-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP214.93
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $275.55