Ability of chlorhexidine, octenidine, polyhexanide and chloroxylenol to inhibit metabolism of biofilm-forming clinical multidrug-resistant organisms
Abstract
Purpose:
This in vitro study was designed to determine if standard antiseptics used for skin and environmental surface cleansing can disrupt the metabolic activity (as a measure of viability) of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates within their native biofilms.
Methods:
Sixty clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant bacteria were selected for testing in different chlorhexidine gluconate, octenidine, polyhexanide and chloroxylenol concentrations. Metabolic inhibition of biofilm for each clinical isolate was analysed using a biofilm viability assay.
Results:
Chlorhexidine gluconate (mean = 83.8% ± 9.8%) and octenidine (mean = 84.5% ± 6.8%) showed the greatest efficacy against biofilms of the tested microorganisms, with the greatest efficacies against MRSA. The antiseptics demonstrated the least efficacy against biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Conclusion:
Chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine showed the greatest level of bacterial metabolic inhibition and were statistically equivalent. Polyhexanide was more effective than chloroxylenol, but both were inferior to chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine against the tested organisms.
Introduction
Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are a common problem, complicated by increasing microbial antibiotic resistance and persistence despite efforts to establish best practices for the prevention of HAIs. In a large prospective cohort study, Lambert and colleagues found that 7% of patients admitted to an intensive care unit developed healthcare-associated pneumonia and 4% developed bloodstream infections (Lambert et al., 2011). The most common isolates were Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotic resistance was found in 75% of the A. baumannii, 11% of the E. coli, 22% of the P. aeruginosa and 34% of the S. aureus isolates (Lambert et al., 2011).
The development of HAIs, particularly when combined with antibiotic resistance, leads to an increased length of stay in hospital and increased mortality (Kyaw et al., 2015). Lye and colleagues reported an excess hospital stay of 6.1 days in patients with gram-negative bacterial HAIs (Lye et al., 2012) and a study of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE; vanB type) found VRE bacteraemia to be associated with longer lengths of stay and greater costs of hospitalisation (Cheah et al., 2013).
It is estimated that at least 59.5% of isolates from general infection episodes may be acquired as a result of cross-transmission from the environment (Agodi et al., 2007). Biofilm-forming organisms, such as P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, are less susceptible to decontamination efforts, owing to the protective effects of biofilm (Akinbobola et al., 2017; Alhede et al., 2014; Gandee et al., 2015). Persistence of these microorganisms within biofilm can lead to contamination of medical devices and to infection (Auler et al., 2010; Galli et al., 2016; Singhal et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2012).
Biofilm-forming bacteria often exhibit antibiotic resistance. Extremely drug-resistant strains of Pseudomonas, as defined by Magiorakos and colleagues (Magiorakos et al., 2012), show significantly increased biofilm formation compared to non–antibiotic-resistant isolates, suggesting that biofilms enhance the fitness of Pseudomonas to persist in the environment (Kaiser et al., 2017). Enterococcus can also form biofilms associated with increased antibiotic resistance (Fallah et al., 2017), and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) biofilms have been shown to be associated with the failure of antibiotic treatment and decolonisation measures (Gunther et al., 2017a). These findings underscore the importance of adequate antisepsis against biofilm-forming organisms.
Antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has been shown to be effective in reducing bacterial colonisation (Gunther et al., 2015). Several studies have documented that daily bathing with CHG reduces the risk of infection by drug-resistant bacteria in hospitalised patients (Climo et al., 2013; Huang et al., 2013; Lowe et al., 2017; Milstone et al., 2013; Mutters et al., 2015). Consistent application of standard infection control measures has been shown to reduce the likelihood of VRE infection in susceptible patients, resulting in the development of recommendations to adequately disinfect the environment (Mutters et al., 2013). In a study by Günther and colleagues, octenidine (OCT) and CHG inhibited MRSA within biofilms, but mupirocin, polyhexanide, and chloroxylenol did not show clinically relevant antimicrobial activity (Gunther et al., 2017b). The greatest bactericidal effects have been reported for CHG (log10 reduction of 9) (Gunther et al., 2017b).
In the present study, we sought to determine if active ingredients found in standard antiseptics used for skin and environmental surface cleansing can disrupt the metabolic activity (as a measure of viability) of multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, MRSA and VRE isolates within their native biofilms.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains
A range of clinical isolates of MDR bacteria was selected for testing in different concentrations of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of CHG (Sage Products LLC, Cary, IL, USA), OCT (TCI, Eschborn, Germany), polyhexanide (POL; Fagron, Barsbüttel, Germany) and chloroxylenol (CLO; Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). Gram-negative isolates were classified as MDR, as described elsewhere (Magiorakos et al., 2012). Clinical isolates of MRSA and VRE collected at the Heidelberg University Hospital (Heidelberg, Germany) were also selected for testing. In total, 40 MDR gram-negative isolates (10 MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae, 10 MDR A. baumannii, 10 MDR E. coli and 10 MDR P. aeruginosa) were tested. A total of 20 MDR gram-positive isolates (10 MRSA and 10 VRE) were also tested, for an overall total of 60 test isolates. Isolates were collected from patients with a diagnosed infection caused by an MDR organism during their stay at the Heidelberg University Hospital during the period 2014–2016. All strains were isolated from clinical samples routinely collected in the microbiology laboratory and stored at –70 °C. The present study is thus descriptive of a bacterial collection of those isolates. Data collected from patients were anonymised and restricted to possible clinical symptoms of infection only. Therefore, according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (1964, Helsinki, Finland; revised 2013, Fortaleza, Brazil), ethical approval was not required. Test organism suspensions contained approximately 2–5 × 109 bacterial cells per millilitre. A 1-mL suspension of each test organism was mixed with 1 mL sterile water of standardised hardness (WSH) with added antiseptic and incubated for six exposure times (15 s, 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 10 min, and 20 min) at 37 °C.
Biofilm viability assay
The ability of CHG, OCT, POL and CLO to inhibit metabolism of each of the 60 biofilm-forming clinical isolates was determined by a biofilm viability assay, as described previously (Gunther et al., 2017b). In brief, each antiseptic was diluted in WSH with a hardness of 300 ppm (measured CaCO3) containing 1.24 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM CaCl2 and 3.33 mM NaHCO3 (all from Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), standardised to a pH of 7 ± 0.2 and used at a temperature of 25 °C. Antiseptics were prepared at a working concentration, according to the concentration of disinfectants in commercially available ready-to-use products as well as at half the standard concentration, the latter to mimic the effects of the antiseptic being further diluted (i.e. possible dilution in a clinical setting). The tested concentrations of the antiseptics were 1% and 2% (w/v) for CHG, 0.05% and 0.1% (w/v) for OCT, and 0.02% and 0.04% (w/v) for POL. CLO was tested at concentrations of 0.24% and 0.48% (w/v) using 0.25% (w/v) Tween 80 (Carl Roth) as solubiliser rather than WSH. The used concentrations accurately reflect the concentrations of active pharmaceutical ingredients found in various commercially available products. However, we tested only the API of those products. Pure dilutions of the active components of disinfectants, without adjuvants, were used in the assay. The media and neutralisers used in this study were validated as previously described for their ability to effectively neutralise the disinfectants used here, before our experiments (Gebel et al., 2002; Gunther et al., 2017b).
To detect surviving bacteria, bacterial metabolic activity was measured by detecting the percentage of conversion of resazurin to resorufin at 620 nm with a Sunrise RC photometer (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). The percentage reduction in conversion rate, compared between treated and untreated samples, was used as the determinant of bactericidal efficacy. This was measured every 60 min for up to 7 h for each sample during incubation at 37 °C. A control solution of bacteria exposed to WSH without antiseptic was used to define 100% viability or 0% inhibition by antiseptic.
Statistical analysis
For descriptive purposes, arithmetic mean, SD, median, interquartile range and cumulative frequency were calculated, as appropriate. Categorical and continuous variables were analysed using either the Student’s t-test or non-parametric tests, as appropriate. Normal distribution was tested with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Pooled efficacy was calculated to control for statistical outliers, usually found in biofilm testing, and to increase statistical robustness. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
The pooled efficacy of all of the antiseptics to inhibit metabolic activity within biofilms is shown in Table 1. Control values were used to calculate pooled efficacy by subtracting control values and using them as baseline activity. Percent values indicate inhibition of bacterial metabolism within biofilms, ranging from 0% inhibition (least efficacy of tested antiseptic) to 100% inhibition (greatest efficacy of tested antiseptic). CHG (mean = 83.8% ± 9.8%) and OCT (mean = 84.5% ± 6.8%) showed the greatest efficacy against biofilms of the tested microorganisms, with no significant difference between the two antiseptics (P = 0.81) (Table 1). POL (mean = 65.4% ± 21.8%) showed a significantly greater efficacy against the tested organisms than CLO (mean = 53.4% ± 26.3%; P < 0.05); however, both were inferior to CHG and OCT.
| Incubation time | MRSA | Klebsiella pneumoniae | Acinetobacter baumannii | Escherichia coli | VRE | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | Pooled efficacy (%) | SD (%) | P | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHG | Concentration | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 2% | –83.8 | ||
| 15 s | –88.7 | –55.3 | –73.9 | –65.1 | –78.3 | –82.2 | –65 | –75.1 | –77.1 | –61.8 | –72.6 | –76.9 | ||||
| 1 min | –95.4 | –93.2 | –74.4 | –79.9 | –86.4 | –91.7 | –92.1 | –91.3 | –83.7 | –81.9 | –71.1 | –71.8 | ||||
| 3 min | –95.8 | –95.3 | –73.2 | –76.5 | –88.1 | –92.9 | –91.8 | –91.6 | –85 | –83.4 | –70.9 | –70.5 | 9.8 | 0.81† | ||
| 5 min | –95.9 | –95.5 | –86.1 | –87.4 | –89.4 | –93.1 | –92.1 | –92.1 | –85.4 | –83.8 | –72.4 | –71.5 | ||||
| 10 min | –96 | –95.5 | –85.6 | –79.7 | –91.4 | –93.4 | –92.1 | –92.2 | –85.4 | –84.3 | –72.2 | –70.3 | ||||
| 20 min | –95.8 | –95.6 | –84.5 | –89.3 | –92.9 | –93.6 | –92.2 | –91.9 | –84.9 | –84.4 | –73.5 | –74.2 | ||||
| OCT | Concentration | 0.05% | 0.1% | 0.05% | 0.1% | 0.05% | 0.1% | 0.05% | 0.1% | 0.05% | 0.1% | 0.05% | 0.1% | –84.5 | ||
| 15 s | –94.5 | –94.6 | –77.3 | –80.7 | –62 | –67.3 | –86.2 | –81.3 | –81 | –82.4 | –68 | –76.7 | ||||
| 1 min | –94.7 | –94.7 | –81.6 | –86.1 | –86 | –87.7 | –84.4 | –88 | –84.3 | –84.3 | –73.7 | –76.7 | ||||
| 3 min | –94.7 | –94.7 | –82.3 | –85.9 | –83.6 | –89 | –87.9 | –83.6 | –84.4 | –84.9 | –75.2 | –78 | 6.8 | 0.81† | ||
| 5 min | –94.6 | –94.6 | –83.3 | –82.6 | –87.3 | –89.3 | –84.4 | –84.5 | –85.1 | –85 | –82.2 | –80.5 | ||||
| 10 min | –94.8 | –94.6 | –81.6 | –86.3 | –86 | –90.7 | –73.4 | –76.5 | –84.7 | –85.6 | –84.4 | –81.3 | ||||
| 20 min | –94.2 | –94.3 | –84.3 | –86.3 | –89.2 | –87.1 | –83.4 | –77.5 | –83.7 | –84.3 | –85.9 | –82.3 | ||||
| POL | Concentration | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.02% | 0.04% | –65.4 | ||
| 15 s | –43.6 | –52.6 | –8.9 | –12.9 | –29.9 | –39.5 | –22.2 | –31.2 | –78.1 | –76 | –17.5 | –21.3 | ||||
| 1 min | –58.3 | –61.4 | –19.4 | –39.4 | –65.2 | –77.3 | –26 | –50.2 | –79.6 | –80.3 | –37 | –41.9 | ||||
| 3 min | –62.3 | –67 | –46.9 | –73.5 | –86.2 | –86.2 | –49.6 | –68.2 | –82.8 | –83.5 | –55.9 | –60.1 | 21.8 | <0.05‡ | ||
| 5 min | –67.7 | –72.4 | –65.3 | –78.8 | –88.1 | –88.4 | –62.6 | –81.9 | –82.8 | –83.4 | –60.1 | –65.8 | ||||
| 10 min | –68.7 | –70.7 | –77.6 | –82.9 | –88.8 | –88.9 | –76.7 | –87.8 | –83 | –83.3 | –63.9 | –71.8 | ||||
| 20 min | –79.4 | –81.2 | –70.3 | –87.1 | –87.2 | –87.8 | –81.5 | –90.5 | –83 | –83.8 | –66.3 | –74.7 | ||||
| CLO | Concentration | 0.24% | 0.48% | 0.24% | 0.48% | 0.24% | 0.48% | 0.24% | 0.48% | 0.24% | 0.48% | 0.24% | 0.48% | –53.4 | ||
| 15 s | –3.3 | –6.4 | –28.5 | –45.6 | –22.3 | –21.3 | –22.3 | –31.6 | –8.9 | –36.3 | –15.7 | –20.3 | ||||
| 1 min | –9.3 | –19 | –48 | –66.5 | –47.8 | –46 | –39.5 | –52.1 | –11.8 | –51.3 | –19.6 | –27.7 | ||||
| 3 min | –15.6 | –28.8 | –66 | –81.3 | –66.9 | –63.7 | –64.4 | –77.7 | –29.2 | –66.8 | –37.6 | –41.3 | 26.3 | <0.05‡ | ||
| 5 min | –19 | –33.7 | –76.2 | –87 | –71.9 | –72 | –82.1 | –88.9 | –35.8 | –75.9 | –44.1 | –50.7 | ||||
| 10 min | –31.9 | –46.2 | –83.8 | –90.8 | –75.3 | –77.1 | –83.6 | –86 | –53.6 | –83.3 | –57.8 | –62.2 | ||||
| 20 min | –48.5 | –65 | –89.2 | –91.5 | –80 | –82.2 | –90.9 | –95.1 | –69.1 | –84.1 | –68.1 | –72.4 | ||||
*
Percent values indicate inhibition of bacterial metabolism within biofilms, ranging from 0% inhibition (least efficacy of tested antiseptic) to 100% inhibition (greatest efficacy of tested antiseptic). Red squares indicate the least antiseptic efficacy (bacterial inhibition), approaching 0% (darkest hue of red). Yellow squares indicate greater antiseptic efficacy than the hues of red but lesser efficacy than the hues of green (lightest to darkest hue of yellow, or lesser to greater efficacy within this category. Green squares indicate the greatest antiseptic efficacy, approaching 100% (darkest hue of green).
†
OCT compared to CHG, Mann–Whitney U test.
‡
POL compared to CLO, Mann–Whitney U test.
CHG, chlorhexidine gluconate; CLO, chloroxylenol; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; OCT, octenidine; POL, polyhexanide; VRE, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.
The least efficacy of all of the antiseptics was observed against biofilms of P. aeruginosa (Table 2). The greatest efficacies of CHG and OCT were observed against MRSA. The greatest efficacy of POL was observed against VRE and the greatest efficacy of CLO was observed against K. pneumoniae (Table 2).
| Antiseptic | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHG | OCT | POL | CLO | ||
| Mean efficacy (%) | Mean efficacy (%) | Mean efficacy (%) | Mean efficacy (%) | ||
| Bacteria | MRSA | −91.5 | −94.6 | −65.4 | −27.2 |
| VRE | −81.8 | −84.1 | −81.6 | −50.5 | |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | −79.6 | −83.2 | −55.3 | −71.2 | |
| Acinetobacter baumannii | −89.5 | −83.8 | −76.1 | −60.5 | |
| Escherichia coli | −88.3 | −82.6 | −60.7 | −67.9 | |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | −72.3 | −78.7 | −53.0 | −43.1 | |
CHG, chlorhexidine gluconate; CLO, chloroxylenol; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; OCT, octenidine; POL, polyhexanide; VRE, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.
The use of lower or higher concentrations of OCT, CHG, POL and CLO had no significant effect on efficacy (Table 3).
| Mean efficacy | P* | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (%) | SD (%) | |||||
| Antiseptic | CHG | Concentration | High | −83.5 | 10.7 | 0.32 |
| Low | −84.2 | 9.0 | ||||
| OCT | Concentration | High | −85.0 | 6.3 | 0.87 | |
| Low | −84.0 | 7.3 | ||||
| POL | Concentration | High | −69.0 | 20.3 | 0.45 | |
| Low | −61.7 | 22.8 | ||||
| CLO | Concentration | High | −59.1 | 24.9 | 0.58 | |
| Low | −47.7 | 26.8 | ||||
*
Student’s t-test.
CHG, chlorhexidine gluconate; CLO, chloroxylenol; OCT, octenidine; POL, polyhexanide.
The efficacies of OCT and POL were significantly greater against gram-positive bacteria than gram-negative bacteria. CLO showed greater efficacy against gram-negative bacteria than gram-positive bacteria. The efficacy of CHG did not differ significantly between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (Table 4). Overall, CHG and OCT had greater efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria than POL or CLO (Table 4).
| Mean inhibition (%) | P* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antiseptic | CHG | Gram | Positive | −86.6 | 0.09 |
| Negative | −82.4 | ||||
| OCT | Gram | Positive | −89.4 | <0.05 | |
| Negative | −82.1 | ||||
| POL | Gram | Positive | −73.5 | <0.05 | |
| Negative | −61.3 | ||||
| CLO | Gram | Positive | −38.9 | <0.05 | |
| Negative | −60.7 |
*
Student’s t-test.
CHG, chlorhexidine gluconate; CLO, chloroxylenol; OCT, octenidine; POL, polyhexanide.
Discussion
We tested commonly used antiseptics on the biofilm formations of clinical isolates of MDR gram-negative bacteria (K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, E. coli and P. aeruginosa) and gram-positive bacteria (MRSA and VRE). We found that CHG (mean = 83.8% ± 9.8%) and OCT (mean = 84.5% ± 6.8%) showed the greatest efficacy against biofilms of the tested microorganisms. The implications of the present study relate to the effective selection of antiseptic agents to ensure adequate disinfection of the environment (Mutters et al., 2013) and reduction of bioburden, HAIs and device-related infections via antiseptic washing (Lambert et al., 2011; Melsen et al., 2013). One of the strengths of this particular study was that the biofilm-forming isolates were collected from a clinical setting and included multiple MDR strains to ensure clinical relevance. Prior studies have shown that antiseptics, including those tested in the present study, are effective against planktonic bacteria. However, pathogenic bacteria are mainly found in biofilms, as this is their natural state (Gunther et al., 2017a, 2017b; Kaiser et al., 2017).
CHG and OCT showed the greatest levels of bacterial metabolic inhibition and were statistically equivalent to each other. POL was more effective than CLO, but both were inferior to CHG and OCT. Our findings regarding CHG and OCT are similar to those of Gunther and colleagues, who reported that CHG and OCT were effective for disinfection of MRSA biofilms in vitro using the same method that we used for determining metabolic activity (Gunther et al., 2017b).
Prior studies have shown OCT and/or CHG to be effective against biofilm-forming organisms but used different methods for measuring the survival of microorganisms in biofilm (Amalaradjou and Venkitanarayanan, 2014; Buckingham-Meyer et al., 2007; Silva et al., 2013; Zelichenko et al., 2013). Most methods of assessing survival of bacteria in biofilm are based on detecting bacterial growth after disrupting the biofilm and harvesting the bacteria, measuring the mass of the biofilm or imaging the affected surface (e.g. endotracheal tubes). The method used in the present study uses photometric measurement of the rate of conversion of resazurin to resorufin as a reflection of the metabolic activity of residual bacteria in a biofilm (Gunther et al., 2017b). The percentage reduction in conversion rate, compared between treated and untreated samples, was used as the determinant of bactericidal efficacy. This method offers a way to detect persistent bacteria that may not have been detected using biofilm disruption, culture or other techniques.
A limitation of the present study is the small sample size, which might limit external validity. An additional limitation of this study is that the results of an in vitro study cannot be directly extrapolated to demonstrate clinical relevance in humans. In vitro studies serve as an important first step in research, but in vivo studies and additional research are needed to determine clinical relevance. Biofilm formation was assessed on representative isolates to ensure that isolates with greater biofilm production were selected. Thus, the tested isolates should reflect those that would cause a significant burden in the healthcare setting.
Conclusions
We found that the APIs of CHG and OCT showed the greatest level of bacterial metabolic inhibition and were statistically equivalent to each other in this regard. POL was more effective than CLO, but both were inferior to CHG and OCT.
Acknowledgments
Writing assistance was provided by Donna Coffman, MD, of MedBio Publications and funded by Sage Products LLC.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by Sage Products LLC (Cary, IL, USA; Stryker Cooperation). Sage Products LLC was neither involved in conducting the experiments nor the interpretation of the results nor the writing of this manuscript.
ORCID iD
Nico T Mutters https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0156-9595
Footnote
Peer review statement Not commissioned; blind peer-reviewed.
References
Agodi A, Barchitta M, Cipresso R, Giaquinta L, Romeo MA, Denaro C. (2007) Pseudomonas aeruginosa carriage, colonization, and infection in ICU patients. Intensive Care Medicine 33: 1155–1161.
Akinbobola AB, Sherry L, McKay WG, Ramage G, Williams C. (2017) Tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in in-vitro biofilms to high-level peracetic acid disinfection. Journal of Hospital Infection 97: 162–168.
Alhede M, Er O, Eickhardt S, Kragh K, Alhede M, Christensen LD, Poulsen SS, Givskov M, Christensen LH, Hoiby N, Tvede M, Bjarnsholt T. (2014) Bacterial biofilm formation and treatment in soft tissue fillers. Pathogens and Disease 70: 339–346.
Amalaradjou MA, Venkitanarayanan K. (2014) Antibiofilm Effect of Octenidine Hydrochloride on Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA and VRSA. Pathogens 3: 404–416.
Auler ME, Morreira D, Rodrigues FF, Abr Ao MS, Margarido PFR, Matsumoto FE, Silva EG, Silva BCM, Schneider RP, Paula CR. (2010) Biofilm formation on intrauterine devices in patients with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Medical Mycology 48: 211–216.
Buckingham-Meyer K, Goeres DM, Hamilton MA. (2007) Comparative evaluation of biofilm disinfectant efficacy tests. Journal of Microbiological Methods 70: 236–244.
Cheah AL, Spelman T, Liew D, Peel T, Howden BP, Spelman D, Grayson ML, Nation RL, Kong DCM. (2013) Enterococcal bacteraemia: factors influencing mortality, length of stay and costs of hospitalization. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 19: E181–189.
Climo MW, Yokoe DS, Warren DK, Perl TM, Bolon M, Herwaldt LA, Weinstein RA, Sepkowitz KA, Jernigan JA, Sanogo K, Wong ES. (2013) Effect of daily chlorhexidine bathing on hospital-acquired infection. New England Journal of Medicine 368: 533–542.
Fallah F, Yousefi M, Pourmand MR, Hashemi A, Nazari Alam A, Afshar D. (2017) Phenotypic and genotypic study of biofilm formation in Enterococci isolated from urinary tract infections. Microbial Pathogenesis 108: 85–90.
Galli J, Calo L, Giuliani M, Sergi B, Lucidi D, Meucci D, Bassotti E, Sanguinetti M, Paludetti G. (2016) Biofilm’s Role in Chronic Cholesteatomatous Otitis Media: A Pilot Study. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 154: 914–916.
Gandee L, Hsieh JT, Sperandio V, Moreira CG, Lai CH, Zimmern PE. (2015) The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. International Brazilian Journal of Urology 41: 67–77.
Gebel J, Werner H-P, Kirsch-Altena A, et al. (2002) Standardmethoden der DGHM zur Prüfung chemischer Desinfektionsverfahren. Wiesbaden: Mhp-Verlag.
Gunther F, Blessing B, Tacconelli E, Mutters NT. (2017a) MRSA decolonization failure-are biofilms the missing link? Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 6: 32.
Gunther F, Kaiser SJ, Fries T, Frank U, Mutters NT. (2015) Susceptibility of multidrug resistant clinical pathogens to a chlorhexidine formulation. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene 56: E176–179.
Gunther F, Scherrer M, Kaiser SJ, DeRosa A, Mutters NT al. (2017b) Comparative testing of disinfectant efficacy on planktonic bacteria and bacterial biofilms using a new assay based on kinetic analysis of metabolic activity. Journal of Applied Microbiology 122: 625–633.
Huang SS, Septimus E, Kleinman K, Moody J, Hickok J, Avery TR, Lankiewicz J, Gombosev A, Terpstra L, Hartford F, Hayden MK, Jernigan JA, Weinstein RA, Fraser VJ, Haffenreffer K, Cui E, Kaganov RE, Lolans K, Perlin JB, Platt R, CDC Prevention Epicenters Program and AHRQ DECIDE Network and Healthcare-Associated Infections Program. (2013) Targeted versus universal decolonization to prevent ICU infection. New England Journal of Medicine 368: 2255–2265.
Kaiser SJ, Mutters NT, DeRosa A, Ewers C, Frank U, Gunther F. (2017) Determinants for persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitals: interplay between resistance, virulence and biofilm formation. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 36: 243–253.
Kyaw MH, Kern DM, Zhou S, Tunceli O, Jafri HS, Falloon J. (2015) Healthcare utilization and costs associated with S. aureus and P. aeruginosa pneumonia in the intensive care unit: a retrospective observational cohort study in a US claims database. BMC Health Service Research 15: 241.
Lambert ML, Suetens C, Savey A, Palomar M, Hiesmayr M, Morales I, Agodi A, Frank U, Mertens K, Schumacher M, Wolkewitz M. (2011) Clinical outcomes of health-care-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in patients admitted to European intensive-care units: a cohort study. Lancet Infectious Diseases 11: 30–38.
Lowe CF, Lloyd-Smith E, Sidhu B, Ritchie G, Sharma A, Jang W, Wong A, Bilawka J, Richards D, Kind T, Puddicombe D, Champagne S, Leung V, Romney MG. (2017) Reduction in hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus with daily chlorhexidine gluconate bathing for medical inpatients. American Journal of Infection Control 45: 255–259.
Lye DC, Earnest A, Ling ML, Yong HC, Fisher DA, Krishnan P, Hsu LY. (2012) The impact of multidrug resistance in healthcare-associated and nosocomial Gram-negative bacteraemia on mortality and length of stay: cohort study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 18: 502–508.
Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, Paterson DL, Rice LB, Stelling J, Struelens MJ, Vatopoulos A, Weber JT, Monnet DL. (2012) Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 18: 268–281.
Melsen WG, Rovers MM, Groenwold RH, Bermans DCJJ, Camus C, Bauer TT, Hanisch EW, Klarin B, Koeman M, Krueger WA, Lacherade JC, Lorente L, Memish ZA, Morrow LE, Nardi G, van Nieuwenhoven CA, O’Keefe GE, Nakos G, Scannapieco FA, Seguin P, Staudinger T, Topeli A, Ferrer M, Bonten MJM. (2013) Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised prevention studies. Lancet Infectious Diseases 13: 665–671.
Milstone AM, Elward A, Song X, Zerr DM, Orscheln R, Speck K, Obeng D, Reich NG, Coffin SE, Perl TM and Pediatric SCRUB Trial Study Group. (2013) Daily chlorhexidine bathing to reduce bacteraemia in critically ill children: a multicentre, cluster-randomised, crossover trial. Lancet 381: 1099–1106.
Mutters NT, Mersch-Sundermann V, Mutters R, Brandt C, Schneider-Brachert W, Frank U. (2013) Control of the Spread of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in Hospitals: Epidemiology and Clinical Relevance. Deutsches Arzteblatt International 110: 725–731.
Mutters NT, Neubert TR, Nieth R, Mutters R. (2015) The role of Octenidol(®), Glandomed(®) and chlorhexidine mouthwash in the prevention of mucositis and in the reduction of the oropharyngeal flora: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. GMS Hygiene and Infection Control 10: Doc05.
Silva RC, Carver RA, Ojano-Dirain CP, Antonelli PJ. (2013) Efficacy of disinfecting solutions in removing biofilms from polyvinyl chloride tracheostomy tubes. Laryngoscope 123: 259–263.
Singhal D, Foreman A, Jervis-Bardy J, Wormald PJ. (2011) Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: Nemesis of endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 121: 1578–1583.
Wilson A, Gray D, Karakiozis J, Thomas J. (2012) Advanced endotracheal tube biofilm stage, not duration of intubation, is related to pneumonia. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 72: 916–923.
Zelichenko G, Steinberg D, Lorber G, Friedman M, Zaks B, Lavy E, Hidas G, Landau EH, Gofrit ON, Pode D, Duvdevani M. (2013) Prevention of initial biofilm formation on ureteral stents using a sustained releasing varnish containing chlorhexidine: in vitro study. Journal of Endourology 27: 333–337.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: October 20, 2020
Issue published: January 2021
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of Infection Prevention.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 1415
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 9 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 10
- Multiresistente Keimbesiedelung bei ukrainischen Kriegsverletzten: ...
- Quality of lower limb preoperative skin preparation using colorless ve...
- The disinfection effectiveness of ozone water and 4.8% chloroxylenol a...
- In vitro study of the ecotoxicological risk of methylisothiazolinone a...
- The Impact of Antiseptic-Loaded Bacterial Nanocellulose on Different B...
- In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of antiseptics again...
- Topical Antibiofilm Agents With Potential Utility in the Treatment of ...
- Effectiveness of implementing a preventive urinary catheter care bundl...
- Application of polyhexanide as a new highly effective antiseptic compo...
- Silver distribution in chronic wounds and the healing dynamics of chro...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
View options
PDF/ePub
View PDF/ePubGet access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
IPS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
IPS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
