This study used sequential mixed-methods analyses to investigate the effectiveness of a research-based language arts curriculum for gifted third graders. Using analytic induction, researchers found that teachers’ beliefs and expectations (time, sense of autonomy, expectations for students, professional expertise) influenced the degree to which they implemented the research intervention with fidelity to its design. Next, maximum variation sampling and quantitative analysis of student outcomes determined that postassessment achievement test scores are higher for students in classrooms with teachers who show high fidelity or adherence to the intervention.

Blakely, C., Mayer, J. P., Gottschalk, R. G., Schmitt, N., Davidson, W. S. (1987). The fidelity—Adaptation debate: Implications for the implementation of public sector social programs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 253-269.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Gross, M. U. M. (Eds.). (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Dane, A. V., Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23-45.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Dumas, J., Lynch, A., Laughlin, J., Smith, E., Prinz, R. (2001). Promoting intervention fidelity: Conceptual issues, methods and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20, 38-47.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Good, T. L., Nichols, S. L. (2001). Expectancy effects in the classroom: A special focus on improving the reading performance of minority students in first-grade classrooms. Educational Psychologist, 36, 113-126.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Harnqvist, K., Gustafsson, J. E., Muthén, B., Nelson, G. (1994). Hierarchical models of ability at class and individual levels. Intelligence, 18, 165-187.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hoover, H. D., Dunbars, S. B., Frisbie, D. A., Oberley, K. R., Ordman, V. L., Naylor, R. J., . . . Shannon, G. P. (2003). The Iowa tests: Guide to research and development. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2005). Layering differential curricula for gifted and talented. In Karnes, F., Bean, S. (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching gifted students (2nd ed., pp. 107-132). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. M. (2004). Reform ideals and teachers’ practical intentions. Education Policy Analysis Archives. Retrieved from https://www.msu.edu/~mkennedy/publications/docs/Teaching%20Practice/PracticalIntentions/Kennedy%20Ideals%20and%20Intentions.pdf
Google Scholar
Kolb, K. J., Jussim, L. (1994). Teacher expectations and underachieving gifted children. Roeper Review, 17, 26-30.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kuklinski, M. R., Weinstein, R. S. (2000). Classroom and grade level differences in the stability of teacher expectations and perceived differential teacher treatment. Learning Environments Research, 3, 1-34.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lillehoj, C. J., Griffin, K. W., Spoth, R. (2004). Program provider and observer ratings of school-based preventive intervention implementation: Agreement and relation to youth outcomes. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 242-257.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Lynch, S., O’Donnell, C. (2005, April). “Fidelity of implementation” in implementation and scale-up research designs: Applications from four studies of innovative science curriculum materials and diverse populations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Miles, M., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Moon, T. R., Brighton, C. M. (2008). Primary teachers’ conceptions of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 447-480.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 315-340.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
National Association for Gifted Children . (2010). Pre-K-Grade 12 standards. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=546
Google Scholar
No Child Left Behind Act, Title IX, General Provisions, Part A, Section, 9101, 20 U.S.C. § 7801 et seq . (2001). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg107.html
Google Scholar
O’Donnell, C. L. (2004). Fidelity of implementation: Background, definitions, and components for measuring (Internal document). Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
Google Scholar
O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33-84.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Plucker, J., Callahan, C. (Eds.). (2007). Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Reis, S. M. (2003). Reconsidering regular curriculum for high-achieving students, gifted underachievers, and the relationship between gifted and regular education. In Borland, J. A. (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 186-200). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Reis, S. M., Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Research related to the Schoolwide Enrichment Triad Model. Gifted Education International, 18, 15-39.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Renzulli, J. S., Reis, S. R. (2010). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A focus on student strengths and interests. Gifted Education International, 26, 140-157.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2005, April). A multi-method and multi-source approach for studying fidelity of implementation. In Lynch, S., O’Donnell, C. L. (Chairs), “Fidelity of implementation” in implementation and scale-up research designs: Applications from four studies of innovative science curriculum materials and diverse populations. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Google Scholar
Slavin, R. (2003). A reader’s guide to scientifically based research: Learning how to assess the validity of education research is vital for creating effective, sustained reform. Educational Researcher, 60(5), 12-16.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). Quality curriculum and instruction for highly able students. Theory Into Practice, 44, 160-166.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
VanTassel-Baska, J., Little, C. A. (2011). Content based curriculum for high ability learners (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOA-article-ppv for $36.00