This study examined the reliability and validity evidence of using the translated version of My Class Activities with South Korean elementary students, and differences between gifted and general students’ perceptions of their regular classes and gifted students’ perceptions of the pull-out program and their regular classes. Confirmatory factor analysis and multiple-indicator multiple-cause modeling were used to examine the validity evidence of using the instrument with South Korean students and differences in students’ perceived class activities. Results revealed that the instrument, with one item removed, could be an effective tool to use with South Korean elementary students. Gifted students had more positive perceptions of the regular classes than their general peers and perceived their pull-out classes more positively than their regular classes.

Ainley, M., Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 4-12. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.00110.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Aldrich, P. W., Mills, C. J. (1989). A special program for highly able rural youth in grades 5 and 6. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 11-14. doi:10.1177/00169862890330010210.1177/001698628903300102
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Armbrister, R. C., McCallum, R. S., Lee, H. D. (2002). A cross-cultural comparison of student social attributions. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 39-49.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.
Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Chae, Y., Gentry, M. (2007). Korean high school student perceptions of classroom quality: Validation research. Gifted and Talented International, 22, 68-76.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Chae, Y., Gentry, M. (2011). Gifted and general high school students’ perceptions of learning and motivational constructs in Korea and the United States. High Ability Studies, 22, 103-118. doi:10.1080/13598139.2011.57727510.1080/13598139.2011.577275
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chapman, D. W., Carter, J. F. (1979). Translation procedures for the cross cultural use of measurement instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(3), 71-76.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Chen, C., Lee, S., Stevenson, H. W. (1996). Academic achievement and motivation of Chinese students: A cross-national perspective. In Lau, S. (Ed.), Growing up the Chinese way: Chinese child and adolescent development (pp. 69-91). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Google Scholar
Cordova, D. L., Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715-730. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.71510.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cox, J., Daniel, N. (1984). The pull-out model. Gifted Child Today, 34, 55-60.
Google Scholar
Cox, J., Daniel, N., Boston, B. O. (1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Google Scholar
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Delcourt, M. A. B. (1994). Characteristics of high-level creative productivity. In Subotnik, R., Arnold, K. (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 401-436). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Google Scholar
Fleith, D. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22, 148-153.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6, 304-312.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gentry, M., Gable, R. K. (2001). My class activities: A survey instrument to assess students’ perceptions of interest, challenge, choice and enjoyment in their classrooms [Instrument]. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Google Scholar
Gentry, M., Gable, R. K., Rizza, M. G. (2002). Students’ perceptions of classroom activities: Are there grade-level and gender differences? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 539-544. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.53910.1037/0022-0663.94.3.539
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gentry, M., Gable, R. K., Springer, P. (2000). Gifted and non-gifted middle school students: Are their attitudes toward school different as measured by the new affective instrument, My Class Activities . . . ? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 74-96.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gentry, M., Owen, S. V. (2004). Secondary student perceptions of classroom quality: Instrumentation and differences between advanced/honors and nonhonors classes. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 20-29.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Gottfried, A. E. (1986). Children’s Academic Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Google Scholar
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3-13. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.310.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gottfried, A. E., Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: Childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 179-183. doi:10.1177/00169862960400040210.1177/001698629604000402
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164-172.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hancock, G. R. (2001). Effect size, power, and sample size determination for structured means modeling and MIMIC approaches to between-groups hypothesis testing of means on a single latent construct. Psychometrika, 66, 373-388.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hong, T. (2010). The utility of the MIMIC model and MCFA method when detecting DIF using Monte Carlo simulation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., Goldberger, A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 631-639.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kaplan, D. (1990). Evaluating and modifying covariance structure models: A review and recommendation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 137-155.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kim, D., Pan, Y., Park, H. S. (1998). High- versus low-context culture: A comparison of Chinese, Korean, and American cultures. Psychology & Marketing, 15, 507-521. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199809)10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199809)
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73-77.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Li, J. (2002). A cultural model of learning: Chinese “Heart and Mind for Wanting to Learn.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 248-269. doi:10.1177/002202210203300300310.1177/0022022102033003003
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Matthews, M. S., McBee, M. T. (2007). School factors and the underachievement of gifted students in a talent search summer program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 167-181. doi:10.1177/001698620729947310.1177/0016986207299473
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Middleton, J. A. (1995). A study of intrinsic motivation in the mathematics classroom: A personal constructs approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 254-279.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Middleton, J. A., Littlefield, J., Lehrer, R. (1992). Gifted students’ conceptions of academic fun: An examination of a critical construct for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 38-44. doi:10.1177/00169862920360010910.1177/001698629203600109
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Miller, R., Gentry, M. (2010). Developing talents among high-potential students from low-income families in an out-of-school enrichment program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 594-627.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Moon, S. M., Feldhusen, J. F., Dillon, D. R. (1994). Long-term effects of an enrichment program based on Purdue Three-Stage Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 38-48. doi:10.1177/00169862940380010610.1177/001698629403800106
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Muthén, B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54, 557-585. doi:10.1007/BF0229639710.1007/BF02296397
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Muthén, L. K., Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
Google Scholar
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 896-915. doi: 10.1037/a001954510.1037/a0019545
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pereira, N., Peters, S., Gentry, M. (2010). The My Class Activities instrument as used in Saturday enrichment program evaluation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 568-593.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Reis, S. M., Burns, D. E., Renzulli, J. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Google Scholar
Reis, S., McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-170. doi:10.1177/00169862000440030210.1177/001698620004400302
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Robinson, N. M. (2006). NAGC symposium: A report card on the state of research in the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 342-345.
Google Scholar | Abstract
Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382-396. doi:10.1177/001698620730632410.1177/0016986207306324
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Swiatek, M. A., Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Elementary and middle school student participation in gifted programs: Are gifted students underserved? Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 118-130. doi:10.1177/0016986203047002010.1177/00169862030470020
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Google Scholar
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Vallerand, R. J., Gagné, F., Senécal, C., Pelletier, L. G. (1994). A comparison of the school intrinsic motivation and perceived competence of gifted and regular students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 172-175.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Van, de, Vijver, F., Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89-99.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1987a). The ineffectiveness of the pull-out program model in gifted education: A minority perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 255-264.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1987b). Response to Renzulli: Advocating the pull-out model. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 267-269.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2006). NAGC symposium: A report card on the state of research in the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 339-341.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Yang, Y., Gentry, M. (2011). Gifted and general elementary students’ perceptions in China and the United States: A cross-national study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Google Scholar
Yuan, K. H., Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. In Sobel, M. E., Becker, M. P. (Eds.), Sociological methodology (pp. 165-200). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOA-article-ppv for $36.00