Policies delegating control of educational policy to the local level are widespread, yet there has been little examination of the effects of such distributed decision making in the area of advanced education programming. We used propensity score matching to examine the effectiveness of locally developed policies for identifying intellectually gifted children identifying themselves as Black or from low-socioeconomic backgrounds across one large U.S. state (Florida) that has a state-level gifted education mandate. Ongoing underrepresentation of traditionally marginalized groups in gifted education was evident, even among districts with policies specifically designed to ameliorate disproportional representation. However, the presence of such a policy reduced the degree of underrepresentation.

Abadie, A., Imbens, G. W. (2002). Simple and bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects (NBER Technical Working Papers 0283). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/t0283
Google Scholar
Artiles, A. J., Rueda, R., Salazar, J. J., Higareda, I. (2005). Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Exceptional Children, 71, 283-300.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Baker, B. D., Friedman-Nimz, R. (2004). State policies and equal opportunity: The example of gifted education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 39-64.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Baker, B. D., McIntire, J. (2003). Evaluating state funding for gifted education programs. Roeper Review, 25, 173-179.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Baldwin, A. Y. (1978). Educational planning for the gifted: Overcoming culturally, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
Google Scholar
Banks, J. A. (1995). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In Banks, J. A., Banks, C. A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 3-24). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Bernal, E. M., Reyna, J. (1974). Analysis of giftedness in Mexican American children and design of a prototype identification instrument. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Google Scholar
Borland, J. H., Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Briggs, C. J., Reis, S. M., Sullivan, E. E. (2008). A national view of promising practices and programs for culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 131-145. doi:10.1177/0016986208316037
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Brown, E., Avery, L., VanTassel-Baska, J., Worley, B., Stambaugh, T. (2006). A five-state analysis of gifted education policies. Roeper Review, 29, 11-23.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R., Johnsen, S. K. (1997). Test of nonverbal intelligence (TONI-3). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Google Scholar
Callahan, C. M. (2005). Identifying gifted students from under-represented populations. Theory Into Practice, 44, 98-104. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip44024
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Castellano, J. A., Pinkos, M. (2005). A rationale for connecting dual language programs with gifted education. In Gonzalez, V., Tinajero, J. V. (Eds.), Review of research and practice (Vol. 3, pp. 107-124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity (No. FS 5.238:38001). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Google Scholar
Coleman, L. (2006). Talent development in economically disadvantaged populations. Gifted Child Today, 29(2), 22-27.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
College Board . (2012). The 8th Annual AP® Report to the Nation, February 8, 2012. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/public/pdf/ap/rtn/AP-Report-to-the-Nation.pdf
Google Scholar
Cross, W. E. (1995). The psychology of nigrescence: Revising the Cross model. In Ponterotto, J. G., Casas, J. M., Suzuki, L. A., Alexander, C. M. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (pp. 93-122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., Cheng, H. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998-2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 126-138. doi:10.1177/0016986210397831
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Delcourt, M. A. B. (2003). Five ingredients for success: Two case studies of advocacy at the state level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 26-37. doi:10.1177/001698620304700104
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Donovan, S. M., Cross, C. T. (Eds.) (2002). Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1987). Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 171-185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Field, S., McBee, M. (2011, May). Biased estimates of treatment effects in propensity score matching when matches are inexact. Paper presented at the Modern Modeling Methods (M3) Conference, Storrs, CT.
Google Scholar
Florida Department of Education . (1998). Assessing limited English proficient (LEP) students for eligibility for gifted programs (Technical Assistance Paper No. FY 1999-6). Retrieved from http://www.fldoe.org/ese/pdf/tap99-6.pdf
Google Scholar
Florida Department of Education . (2010). Education of gifted students in Florida. Retrieved from http://www.fldoe.org/bii/Gifted_Ed/pdf/StateGiftedPlan.pdf
Google Scholar
Florida Department of State . (2007). 6A-6.03019 special instructional programs for students who are gifted. Retrieved from https://www.flrules.org/Gateway/View_notice.asp?id=1062070
Google Scholar
Flynn, J. R. (2000). The hidden history of IQ and special education: Can the problems be solved? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 191-198.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., Whiting, G. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74, 289-306.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ford, D. Y., Moore, J. L., Whiting, G. W., Grantham, T. C. (2008). Conducting cross-cultural research: Implications for gifted education. Gifted Education Press Quarterly, 22(1), 2-6.
Google Scholar
Ford, D. Y., Whiting, G. W. (2011). Beyond testing: Social and psychological considerations in recruiting and retaining gifted Black students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 131-155. doi:10.1177/016235321003400106
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Fordham, S., Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting White.’” The Urban Review, 18, 176-206.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Frasier, M. M. (1991). Disadvantaged and culturally diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 234-245.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Gallagher, J. (2007). We are masters of our tests, or are we? Roeper Review, 29, 159.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Golden, D. (2004, April 7). Boosting minorities in gifted programs poses dilemmas; Nontraditional criteria lift admissions of blacks, poor; fear of diluting programs; New focus on the very top. Wall Street Journal, p. 1A.
Google Scholar
Gonzalez, V. (1996). Do you believe in intelligence? Sociocultural dimensions of intelligence assessment in majority and minority students. Educational Horizons, 75, 45-52.
Google Scholar
Grantham, T. C. (2004). Rocky Jones: Case study of a high-achieving Black male’s motivation to participate in gifted classes. Roeper Review, 26, 208-215.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Guo, S., Barth, R. P., Gibbons, C. (2006). Propensity scope matching strategies for evaluation substance abuse services for child welfare clients. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 357-383. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.04.012
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Guo, S., Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Hansford, S. J., Bonar, A. M., Scally, J. M., Burge, N. A. (2001). Student identification. In Landrum, M., Callahan, C., Shaklee, B. (Eds.), Aiming for excellence: Annotations to the NAGC Pre-K– Grade 12 gifted program standards (pp. 39-52.). Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.
Google Scholar
Harris, B., Rapp, K. E., Martinez, R. S., Plucker, J. A. (2007). Identifying English language learners for gifted and talented programs: Current practices and recommendations for improvement. Roeper Review, 30, 26-29.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P. E. (1998). Matching as an economic evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 261-294. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00044
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing of the American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, & the National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Google Scholar
Kogan, E. (2001). Gifted bilingual students: A paradox? New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Landrum, M., Callahan, C., Shaklee, B. (Eds.). (2001). Aiming for excellence: Annotations to the NAGC pre-K–grade 12 gifted program standards. Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.
Google Scholar
Matthews, M. S., Castellano, J. (Eds.). (2012). Talent development for English language learners in inclusive settings. Manuscript in preparation.
Google Scholar
Matthews, M. S., Kirsch, L. (2011). Evaluating gifted identification practice: Aptitude testing and linguistically diverse learners. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27, 155-180. doi:10.1080/15377903.2011.565281
Google Scholar | Crossref
Matthews, M. S., Shaunessy, E. (2010). Putting standards into practice: Evaluating the utility of the NAGC pre-K—grade 12 gifted program standards. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 159-167. doi:10.1177/0016986209356708
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Matthews, P., Matthews, M. S. (2004). Heritage language instruction and giftedness in language minority students: Pathways toward success. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 50-55.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
McBee, M. (2006). A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status. Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 103-111.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
McBee, M. (2010). Examining the probability of identification for gifted programs for students in Georgia elementary schools: A multilevel path analysis study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 283-297. doi:10.1177/0016986210377927
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Miller, R., Gentry, M. (2010). Developing talents among high-potential students from low-income families in an out-of-school enrichment program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 594-627.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Milner, H. R., Ford, D. Y. (2007). Cultural considerations in the underrepresentation of culturally diverse elementary students in gifted education. Roeper Review, 29, 166-173.
Google Scholar | Crossref
O’Connor, C., Mueller, J., Lewis, R. L. H., Rivas-Drake, D., Rosenberg, S. (2011). “Being” Black and strategizing for excellence in a racially stratified academic hierarchy. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1232-1257. doi:10.3102/0002831211410303
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability . (1996). Information brief of Florida’s gifted program (Report No. 95-45). Retrieved from http://www.oppaga.state.fl.us/reports/pdf/9545rpt.pdf
Google Scholar
Ogbu, J. U., Simons, H. D. (1998). Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 29, 155-188.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Oller, J. W., Kim, K., Choe, Y. (2000). Testing verbal (language) and nonverbal abilities in language minorities: A socio-educational problem in historical perspective. Language Testing, 17, 341-360.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Patton, J. M. (1997). Disproportionate representation in gifted programs: Best practices for meeting the challenge. In Artiles, A. J., Zamora-Durán, G. (Eds.), Reducing disproportionate representation of culturally diverse students in special and gifted education (pp. 59-81). Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
Google Scholar
Peters, S. J., Gentry, M. (2010). Multigroup construct validity evidence of the HOPE Scale: Instrumentation to identify low-income elementary students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 298-313. doi:10.1177/0016986210378332
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Pierce, R. L., Adams, C. M., Neumeister, K. L. S., Cassady, F. C., Dixon, F. A., Cross, T. L. (2007). Development of an identification procedure for a large urban school corporation: Identifying culturally diverse and academically gifted elementary students. Roeper Review, 29, 113-118.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Robinson, A., Moon, S. M. (2003). A national study of local and state advocacy events in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 8-25.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rosenbaum, P. R., Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rosenbaum, P. R., Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516-524.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rubin, D. B. (2001). Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: Application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 169-188.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Russo, C. J., Harris, J. J., Ford, D. Y. (1996). Gifted education and law: A right, privilege, or superfluous? Roeper Review, 18, 179-182.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Schultz, G. F. (1993). Socioeconomic advantage and achievement motivation: Important mediators of academic performance in minority children in urban schools. The Urban Review, 25, 221-232.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Shaunessy, E., Karnes, F. A., Cobb, Y. (2004). Assessing potentially gifted students from lower socioeconomic status with nonverbal measures of intelligence. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 98, 1129.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Solano-Flores, G., Li, M. (2006). The use of generalizability (G) theory in the testing of linguistic minorities. Educational Measurement, 25, 13-22.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance of women and African-Americans. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science, 25, 1-21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Stuart, E. A., Green, K. M. (2008). Using full matching to estimate causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Examining the relationship between adolescent marijuana use and adult outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 44, 395-406.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Swanson, J. D. (2006). Breaking through assumptions about low-income, minority gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 11-25.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
U.S. Department of Education . (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ocps.net/cs/ese/programs/gifted/Documents/National%20Excellence_%20A%20Case%20for%20Developing%20America’s%20Talent_%20Introduction.pdf
Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education . (2007). Jacob K. Javits gifted and talented students education program. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/programs/javits/index.html
Google Scholar
Valdés, G. (Ed.). (2003). Expanding definitions of giftedness: The case of young interpreters from immigrant communities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Valdés, G., Figueroa, R. A. (1994). Bilingualism and testing: A special case of bias. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Google Scholar
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). Curriculum policy development for gifted programs: Converting issues in the field to coherent practice. In Borland, J. (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 173-185). Danvers, MA: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A. X., Evans, B. L. (2007). Patterns of identification and performance among gifted students identified through performance tasks. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 218-231. doi:10.1177/00016986207302717
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
VanTassel-Baska, J., Stambaugh, T. (Eds.). (2007). Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners. Conference proceedings from the National Leadership Conference on Low-Income Promising Learners. Washington, DC: The National Association for Gifted Children and the Center for Gifted Education, College of William & Mary.
Google Scholar
Whiting, G. W. (2006). From at risk to at promise: Developing scholar identities among Black males. Journal of Advanced Academics, 17, 222-229. doi:10.4219/jsge-2006-407
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Whitty, G. (2006). Education(al) research and education policy making: Is conflict inevitable? British Educational Research Journal, 32, 159-176.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Yoon, S. Y., Gentry, M. (2009). Racial and ethnic representation in gifted programs: Current status of and implications for gifted Asian American students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 121-136. doi:10.1177/0016986208330564
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ziegler, A., Raul, T. (2000). Myth and reality: A review of empirical studies on giftedness. High Ability Studies, 11, 113-135. doi:10.1080/13598130020001188
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOA-article-ppv for $36.00