This study used a self-determination theory lens to investigate high ability learners’ motivational experiences. Participants were 15 high ability youth involved in a summer learning camp for gifted students. Two major themes emerged from qualitative data analysis: (a) The Fun Factor of Learning and (b) The Rewards and Pressures of Good Grades. Fun learning experiences (i.e., intrinsic motivation, identified regulation) occurred when parents and teachers tailored learning activities to personalized interests and goals. Likewise, learning choices helped increase intrinsic motivation and identified regulation. Motivational experiences were decreased when parents exerted high levels of pressure on academic outcomes (e.g., grades): therefore, introjected regulation could be especially relevant in understanding motivation in high ability learners.

Chae, Y., Gentry, M. (2011). Gifted and general high school students’ perceptions of learning and motivation constructs in Korea and the United States. High Ability Studies, 22, 103-118. doi:10.1080/13598139.2011.577275
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cho, S., Lin, C. Y. (2011). Influence of family processes, motivation, and beliefs about intelligence on creative problem solving of scientifically talented individuals. Roeper Review, 33, 46-58. doi:10.1080/02783193.2011.530206
Google Scholar | Crossref
Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., Gross, M. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vols. 1-2). Iowa City: University of Iowa, The Connie Belin and Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
Google Scholar
Corpus, J. H., McClintic-Gilbert, M. S., Hayenga, A. O. (2009). Within-year changes in children’s intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: Contextual predictors and academic outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 154-166. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.01.001
Google Scholar | Crossref
Covington, M. V. (2000). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation in schools: A reconciliation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 22-25. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00052
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B., Leone, D. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 119-142. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
Google Scholar | Crossref
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1995). The basis for true self-esteem. In Kernis, M. H. (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31-49). New York, NY: Plenum.
Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of human behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gagne, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21, 81-99. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2010.525341
Google Scholar | Crossref
Garn, A. C., Matthews, M. S., Jolly, J. L. (2010). Parental influences on the academic motivation of gifted students: A self-determination perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 263-272. doi:10.1177/0016986210377657
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Gottfried, A. E., Gottfried, A. W. (2004). Toward the development of a conceptualization of gifted motivation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 121-132. doi:10.1177/001698620404800205
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Cook, C. R., Morris, P. E. (2005). Educational characteristics of adolescents with gifted academic intrinsic motivation: A longitudinal investigation from school entry through early adulthood. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 172-186. doi:10.1177/001698620504900206
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 798-811. doi:10.1037/a0012841
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kao, C. Y. (2011). The dilemma of competition encountered by musically gifted Asian male students: An exploration from the perspective of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 22, 19-42. doi:10.1080/13598139.2011.576085
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kusurkar, R. A., Croiset, G., Kruitwagen, C., ten Cate, O. (2011). Validity evidence for the measurement of the strength of motivation for medical school. Advances in Health Science Education, 16, 183-195. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9253-4
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
LeCompte, M. D., Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 567-582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McArdle, S., Duda, J. L. (2004). Exploring social-contextual correlates of perfectionism in adolescents: A multivariate perspective. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 765-788. doi:10.1007/s10608-004-0665-4
Google Scholar | Crossref
McCoach, D. B., Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 144-154. doi:10.1177/001698620304700205
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mouratidis, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Michou, A., Soenens, B. (2013). Within-person configurations and temporal relations of personal and perceived-parent promoted aspirations to school correlates among adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 895-910. doi:10.1037/a0032838
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mudrak, J. (2011). “He was born that way”: Parental constructions of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 22, 199-217. doi:10.1080/13598139.2011.622941
Google Scholar | Crossref
Neber, H., Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated learning with high gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivation, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13, 59-74. doi:10.1080/13598130220132316
Google Scholar | Crossref
Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133-144. doi:10.1177/1477878509104318
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Peters, S. J. (2012). Underachievers: From whose perspective? A commentary on “Differentiating low performance of the gifted learner: Achieving, underachieving, and selective consuming students.” Journal of Advanced Academics, 23, 176-179. doi:10.1177/1932202X12438718
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Phillips, N., Lindsay, G. (2006). Motivation in gifted students. High Ability Studies, 17, 57-73. doi:10.1080/13598130600947119
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research: Theoretical and applied (pp. 183-203). Rochester, NY: Rochester Press.
Google Scholar
Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal, 106, 225-236.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Reis, S. M., Gubbins, E. J., Briggs, C., Schreiber, F. R., Richards, S., Jacobs, J. (2004). Reading instruction for talented readers: Case studies documenting few opportunities for continuous progress. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 309-338. doi:10.1177/001698620404800406
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rodgers, K. A. (2008). Racial identity, centrality and giftedness: An expectancy-value application of motivation in gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 30, 111-120. doi:10.1080/02783190801955103
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. doi:10.1037/000.-066X.55.1.68
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Schick, H., Phillipson, S. N. (2009). Learning motivation and performance excellence in adolescents with high intellectual potential: What really matters? High Ability Studies, 20, 15-37. doi:10.1080/13598130902879366
Google Scholar | Crossref
Siegle, D., McCoach, D. B. (2005). Making a difference: Motivating gifted students who are not achieving. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 22-27.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Smith, J. A., Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Smith, J. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53-80). London, England: Sage.
Google Scholar
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589-604. doi:10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Vallerand, R. J., Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook on self-determination research (pp. 37-64). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., Cambria, J. (2010). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In Urdan, T. C., Karabenick, S. A. (Eds.), The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (Vol. 16A, pp. 35-70). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Yoon, C.-H. (2009). Self-regulated learning and instructional factors in the scientific inquiry of scientifically gifted Korean middle school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 203-216. doi:10.1177/0016986209334961
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOA-article-ppv for $36.00