![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Approximately one quarter of American students attend rural schools; however, the needs of these students are often overlooked in education policy despite well-documented limited financial resources and pervasive poverty. Relatively little is known about the experiences of gifted students in rural areas and even less about the teachers serving this population. The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate the rural-specific context to identify factors associated with rural teachers’ instructional decisions to deliver gifted curriculum with fidelity. More specifically, the study examined the experiences for teachers in rural schools when implementing a research-based language arts curriculum and how these experiences relate to fidelity of implementation. Findings suggest that rural-specific characteristics of gifted programming, limited resources, and time challenges present unique challenges for these gifted education teachers.
References
Section:
|
Azano, A. P. (2013). The CLEAR curriculum model. In Callahan, C., Hertberg-Davis, H. (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education (pp. 301-314). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Azano, A. P. (2014). Gifted rural students. In Plucker, J., Callahan, C. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (2nd ed., pp. 297-304). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Azano, A. P., Missett, T. C., Callahan, C. M., Oh, S., Brunner, M., Foster, L., Moon, T. R. (2011). Exploring the relationship between fidelity of implementation and academic achievement in a third-grade gifted curriculum: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22, 693-719. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Cross, T. L., Burney, V. H. (2005). High ability, rural, and poor: Lessons from Project Aspire and implications for school counselors. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 148-156. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Economic Research Service . (2012). Rural America at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eb-economic-brief/eb21.aspx Google Scholar | |
|
Edmondson, J., Butler, T. (2010). Teaching school in rural America: Toward an educated hope. In Schafft, K. A., Youngblood Jackson, A. (Eds.), Rural education for the twenty-first century (pp. 150-172). University Park: Penn State University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
|
Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Hébert, T. P., Beardsley, T. M. (2001). Jermaine: A critical case study of a gifted black child living in rural poverty. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 85-103. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Howley, A., Howley, C., Pendarvis, E. (2003). The possible good gifted programs in rural schools and communities might do. In Borland, J. (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 80-104). New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Howley, A., Rhodes, M., Beall, J. (2009). Challenges facing rural schools: Implications for gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 515-536. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Malhoit, G. C. (2005, July). Providing rural students with a high quality education: The rural perspective on the concept of educational adequacy. The Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved from http://www.ruraledu.org/user_uploads/file/Providing_Rural_Students.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Merrow, J. (2004). Gifted education: The effects of No Child Left Behind. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/education/jan-june04/education_05-25.html Google Scholar | |
|
Moon, T. R., Callahan, C. M., Oh, S., Hailey, E. P. (2012a, November). Current status of K-12 gifted programs: A national survey. Denver, CO: National Association for Gifted Children. Google Scholar | |
|
Moon, T. R., Callahan, C. M., Oh, S., Hailey, E. P. (2012b, April). National trends and research and policy issues in the U.S. and Canada: Investigation into the status of elementary gifted programs. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: American Educational Research Association. Google Scholar | |
|
Plucker, J. A. (2013). Students from rural environments. In Callahan, C., Hertberg-Davis, H. (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education (pp. 301-314). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar |
