The present qualitative study was conducted in response to federal initiatives aimed at increasing the number of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) schools in the United States; and to better understand STEM high school administrators’, teachers’, and students’ perceptions of the characteristics of the curricular and instructional strategies and practices representative of their schools. Six STEM high schools with diverse organizational models were purposively selected to represent varied geographical regions, socioeconomic and ethnic groups, and levels of entrance criteria. During 2-day site visits at each school, administrators, teachers, and students were interviewed. Three themes emerged from the data analysis: (a) a common vision of a challenging and engaging learning environment, (b) a focus on applying curricular and instructional strategies and practices to real-world problems, and (c) an appreciation for academic and affective support in the challenging learning environment. Interested stakeholders might discover strategies and practices to support their respective missions.

America COMPETES Act, H.R. 2272, 110th Cong . (2007) (enacted). Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr2272eas/pdf/BILLS-110hr2272eas.pdf
Google Scholar
America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010, H.R. 5116, 111th Cong . (2010) (enacted). Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr5116enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr5116enr.pdf
Google Scholar
Birks, M., Chapman, Y., Francis, K. (2008). Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13, 68-75.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (Handbook I). New York, NY: Longman.
Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In Husén, T., Postlethwaite, T. N. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1643-1647). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Google Scholar
Committee on Highly Successful Schools or Programs in K-12 STEM Education & National Research Council . (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13158
Google Scholar
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology; Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy; National Academy of Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; & Institute of Medicine . (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11463.html
Google Scholar
Costa, A. L. (2001). Teacher behaviors that enable student thinking. In Costa, A. L. (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd. ed., pp. 359-369). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Cotton, K. (2001). Classroom questioning (Close-Up #5). Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
Google Scholar
Cross, T. L., Frazier, A. D. (2010). Guiding the psychosocial development of gifted students attending specialized residential schools. Roeper Review, 32, 32-41.
Google Scholar | Crossref
De Witt, N. (1961). Education and professional employment in the U.S.S.R. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Google Scholar
Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 98-119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gall, M. D., Rhody, T. (1987). Review of research on questioning techniques. In Wilen, W. W. (Ed.), Questions, questioning, techniques, and effective teaching (pp. 23-48). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Google Scholar
Gerlach, J. (2012, April 11). STEM: Defying a simple definition. National Science Teachers Association WebNews Digest. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=59305&print=true
Google Scholar
Hébert, T. P. (2011). Understanding the social and emotional lives of gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Google Scholar
Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education . (n.d.). The motivation to learn begins with a problem. Retrieved from http://www.udel.edu/inst/
Google Scholar
Jones, B. M. (2009). Profiles of state-supported residential math and science schools. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 472-501.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Kolloff, P. B. (2003). State-supported residential high schools. In Colangelo, N., Davis, G. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 238-245). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Google Scholar
Lundgren, D. D., Laugen, R. C., Lindeman, C. A., Shapiro, M. J., Thomas, J. (2011). Schools like ours: Realizing our STEM future. Lynchburg, VA: National Consortium for Specialized Schools of Mathematics, Science, and Technology.
Google Scholar
Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T., Burton, E. P., Means, B. (2013, April 6-9). Inclusive STEM-focused high schools: STEM education policy and opportunity structures. Paper presented at the NARST 2013 Annual Conference in Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.
Google Scholar
Marshall, S. P. (2010). Re-imagining specialized STEM academies: Igniting and nurturing decidedly different minds by design. Roeper Review, 32, 48-60.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Marshall, S. P., McGee, G. W., McLaren, E., Veal, C. C. (2011). Discovering and developing diverse STEM talent: Enabling academically talented urban youth to flourish. Gifted Child Today, 34, 16-23.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine . (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12999
Google Scholar
National Defense Education Act, P.L. 85-864 . (1958). Retrieved from http://wwwedu.oulu.fi/tohtorikoulutus/jarjestettava_opetus/Troehler/NDEA_1958.pdf
Google Scholar
National Research Council . (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
National Research Council . (2013). Monitoring progress toward successful K-12 STEM education: A nation advancing? (Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2010). Special schools and other options for gifted STEM students. Roeper Review, 32, 61-70.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Pennsylvania STEM Network Southwest Region . (n.d.). Soutwest Pennsylvania long range plan (2009 - 2018) plan summary. Retrieved from http://business-leadershipcoaching.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/SWP-STEM-STRATEGY-Final-Report-Summary-July-2009.pdf
Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, S. I. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of giftedness in children. New York, NY: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Pfeiffer, S. I., Overstreet, M., Park, A. (2010). The state of science and mathematics education in state-supported residential academies: A nationwide survey. Roeper Review, 32, 25-31.
Google Scholar | Crossref
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology . (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for America’s future. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stem-ed-final.pdf
Google Scholar
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology . (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
Google Scholar
Rapp, K. E. (2008). Special schools. In Plucker, J. A., Callahan, C. M. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 617-628). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Google Scholar
Redfield, D. L., Rousseau, E. W. (1981). A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 237-245.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-279). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Roberts, J. L. (2010). Lessons learned: Advocating for a specialized school of mathematics and science. Roeper Review, 32, 42-47.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Roberts, J. L. (2013). The Gatton Academy: A case study of a state residential high school with a focus on mathematics and science. Gifted Child Today, 36, 193-200.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Samson, G. E., Strykowski, B., Weintein, T., Walberg, H. J. (1987). The effects of teacher questioning levels on student achievement: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 290-295.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sayler, M. F. (2006). Special schools for the gifted and talented. In Dixon, F. A., Moon, S. M. (Eds.), The handbook of secondary gifted education (pp. 547-559). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Google Scholar
Scott, C. (2012). An investigation of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) focused high schools in the U.S. Journal of STEM Education, 13(5), 30-39.
Google Scholar
Scott, P. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45-80.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Shaunessy, E. (2005). Questioning strategies for teaching the gifted. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
Google Scholar
Sobel, I. (1978). The human capital revolution in economic development: Its current history and status. Comparative Education Review, 22, 278-308.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stanley, J. C. (1987). State residential high schools for mathematically talented youth. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 770-772.
Google Scholar
Stepien, W., Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 25-28.
Google Scholar | ISI
Subcommittee on Research and Science Education, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology . (2011). What makes for successful K-12 STEM education: A closer look at the effective STEM education approaches (Serial No. 112-42). Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-112hhrg70588/pdf/CHRG-112hhrg70588.pdf
Google Scholar
Subotnik, R., Edmiston, A., Rayhack, K. (2007). Developing national policies in STEM talent development: Obstacles and opportunities. In Csermely, P., Korlevic, K., Sulyok, K. (Eds.), Science education, models and networking of student research training under 21 (pp. 28-38). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
Google Scholar
Subotnik, R. F., Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343-357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Subotnik, R. F., Kolar, C., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Cross, T. L. (2010). Specialized science high schools: Exploring contributions of the model to adolescent talent development. Roeper Review, 32, 5-6.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Worrell, F. C. (2012). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3-54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Subotnik, R. F., Tai, R. H., Rickoff, R., Almarode, J. (2010). Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: What do we know now and what will we know in 5 years? Roeper Review, 32, 7-16.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In Colangelo, N., Davis, G. A. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21-52). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Tanner, D., Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum development: Theory into practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237-246.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Thomas, J. (2000). First year findings: NCSSSMST longitudinal study of gifted students. NCSSSMST Journal, 5(2), 4-6.
Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Love, B. L. (2002). An analysis of post-graduation experiences among gifted secondary students. NCSSSMST Journal, 6(1), 3-8.
Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Williams, C. (2010). The history of specialized STEM schools and the formation and role of the NCSSSMST. Roeper Review, 32, 17-24.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, C. A., Eidson, C. C. (2003). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum grades K-5. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, C. A., Imbeau, M. B. (2010). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, C. A., Jarvis, J. (2009). Differentiation: Making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning & instruction. In Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., McMillen, K. S., Eckert, R. D., Little, C. A. (Eds.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (2nd ed., pp. 599-628). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education . (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
Winne, P. H. (1979). Experiments relating teachers’ use of higher cognitive questions to student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 49, 13-50.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wolf, D. P. (1987, Winter). The art of questioning (Academic Connections, pp. 1-7). Retrieved from http://www.exploratorium.edu/ifi/resources/workshops/artofquestioning.html
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOA-article-ppv for $36.00