Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between self-efficacy and maintenance of interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) resulting in completion of an undergraduate degree in a science related area. To pursue this analysis, the researchers surveyed 3,510 graduates from selective specialized science high schools within the United States as well as 603 same age participants in Talent Search programs who did not graduate from a specialized science high school. Using binary logistic regression analysis, the researchers identified individual-level variables associated with the decision by both groups of high-ability adolescents to earn an undergraduate degree in STEM. These variables include self-efficacy and stability of interest in science, mathematics, and/or technology, and suggest that both specialized science high schools and Talent Search programs both serve equally well as incubators of talent for adolescents with a proclivity for STEM related disciplines.
|
Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Google Scholar | |
|
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine. Google Scholar | |
|
Dabney, K. P., Chakraverty, D., Tai, R. H. (2013). The association of family influence and initial interest in science. Science Education, 97, 395-409. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and malleable minds: Implications for giftedness and talent. In Subotnik, R. F., Robinson, A., Callahan, C. M., Johnson, P. (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education (pp. 7-18). Storrs, CT: National Center for Research on Gifted and Talented. Google Scholar | |
|
Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Methodology in the social sciences. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Harackiewicz, J. M., Rozek, C. S., Hulleman, C. S., Hyde, J. S. (2012). Helping parents to motivate adolescents in mathematics and science: An experimental test of a utility–value intervention. Psychological Science, 23, 899-906. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Hedges, V., Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 60-87. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Heller, K. A. (2007). Scientific ability and creativity. High Ability Studies, 18, 209-234. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Heller, K. A., Perleth, Ch, Lim, T. K. (2005). The Munich Model of Giftedness designed to identify and promote gifted students. In Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp.147-170). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hidi, S., Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151-179. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Kreft, I., de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introduction to multilevel modeling. London, England: SAGE. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, RICs, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63-82. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Webb, R. M., Bleske-Rechek, A. (2006). Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychological Science, 17, 194-199. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Maltese, A. V., Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 669-685. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Marsh, H. W., Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213-231. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30-38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
National Commission on Excellence in Education . (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
National Science Board . (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012 (NSB 12–01). Arlington VA: National Science Foundation. Google Scholar | |
|
Plucker, J. A., Robinson, N. M., Greenspon, T. S., Feldhusen, J. F., McCoach, D. B., Subotnik, R. F. (2004). It’s not how the pond makes you feel, but rather how high you can jump. American Psychologist, 59, 268-269. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology . (2012). Engage to excel: Producing an additional one million college graduates in STEM. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_feb.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Wethersfield, CT: Creative Learning Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Rice, L., Barth, J. M., Guadagno, R. E., Smith, G. P. A., McCallum, D. M. (2013). The role of social support in students’ perceived abilities and attitudes toward math and science. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1028-1040. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9801-8 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead. Google Scholar | |
|
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G. (2010). Big-fish-little-pond effect: Generalizability and moderation—Two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 390-433. doi:10.3102/0002831209350493 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Stanley, J. C. (1976). The case for extreme educational acceleration of intellectually brilliant youths. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 66-75. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223-246). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Abilities are forms of developing expertise. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 11-20. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Giftedness as developing expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved knowledge. High Ability Studies, 12, 159-179. doi:10.1080/13598130120084311 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Subotnik, R. F., Edmiston, A. M., Cook, L., Ross, M. D. (2010). Mentoring for talent development, creativity, social skills, and inside knowledge: The APA Catalyst Program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 714-739. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski–Kubilius, P., Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3-54. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., Fan, X. (2006). Planning for early careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21-52). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Thomas, J., Williams, C. (2010). The history of specialized STEM schools and the formation and role of NCSSSMST. Roeper Review, 32, 17-24. doi:10.1080/02783190903386561 Google Scholar | Crossref |

