Using observations and interviews, the researchers explore the experiences and perspectives of students, teachers, and administrators at six specialized high schools with a focus on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) as they pertain to the practices and structures affecting student outcomes. Four themes were found to be common across schools: a culture of intellectualism and inclusion, a valuation on research, the role of inquiry, and the importance of personal responsibility and independent learning for students. Nuanced differences were noted across sites, notably the difference in student-reported levels of stress; however, substantial differences in student experiences based on STEM school model type were not observed.

America COMPETES Act, Pub. L. No. 110-69, 121 Stat. 572–718 (2007).
Google Scholar
Arkansas School for Mathematics, Science, and the Arts . (2014). Available from http://www.aT-STEMsmsa.org/
Google Scholar
Brody, L. (2006, September). Measuring the effectiveness of STEM talent initiatives for middle and high school students. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Academies Center for Education, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
Bruhwiler, C., Blatchford, P. (2011). Effects of class size and adaptive teaching competency on classroom processes and academic outcome. Learning and Instruction, 21, 95-108. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.004
Google Scholar | Crossref
Central Virginia Governor’s School . (2011). Available from http://cvgs.k12.va.us/
Google Scholar
Davalos, R. A., Haensly, P. A. (1997). After the dust has settled: Youth reflect on their high school mentored research experience. Roeper Review, 19, 204-207. doi:10.1080/02783199709553830
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dearborn Center for Mathematics, Science, and Technology . (2011). Available from http://dcmst.dearbornschools.org/
Google Scholar
East Chicago Central High School . (2011). Available from http://central.scec.k12.in.us/
Google Scholar
Eleanor Roosevelt High School . (2014). Retrieved from http://www1.pgcps.org/eleanorroosevelt/
Google Scholar
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock, C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Feldhusen, J. F., Jarwan, F. (1995). Predictors of academic success at state-supported residential schools for mathematics and science: A validity study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 505-512. doi:10.1177/0013164495055003018
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Franco, M. S., Patel, N. H., Lindsey, J. (2012). Are STEM high school students entering the STEM pipeline? NCSSSMST Journal, 17, 14-23.
Google Scholar
Hanford, S. (1997). An examination of specialized schools as agents of educational change. New York, NY: Columbia University.
Google Scholar
Hill, H., Rowan, B., Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 42, 371-406. doi:10.3102/00028312042002371
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hutchinson, D., Warshaw, S. (2011). STEM leaders roundtable: Part I—Research and the curriculum. NCSSSMST Journal, 16, 34-36.
Google Scholar
Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy . (2011). Available from http://www3.imsa.edu/
Google Scholar
Lundgren, D., Laughen, R., Lindeman, C., Shapiro, M., Thomas, J. (2011). Schools like ours: Realizing our STEM future. Chicago, IL: Berrien.
Google Scholar
Massachusetts Academy of Math & Science . (2011). Available from http://www.massacademy.org/
Google Scholar
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474-496. doi:10.1002/tea.20347
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
National Association for Gifted Children . (2010). NAGC pre-K-grade 12 gifted programming standards: A blueprint for quality gifted programs. Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
National Consortium for Specialized Secondary Schools of Mathematics, Science, and Technology . (2011). Available from http://www.ncsssmst.org/
Google Scholar
National Research Council Committee on Highly Successful Schools in Programs for K-12 STEM Education . (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Peters-Burton, E. E., Lynch, S. L., Behrend, T. S., Means, B. B. (2014). Inclusive STEM high school design: 10 critical components. Theory Into Practice, 53, 64-71. doi:10.1080/00405841.2014.862125
Google Scholar | Crossref
Peters-Burton, E., Kaminsky, S. E., Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T. S., Ross, K. M., House, A., Han, E. M. (2013). Wayne School of Engineering: Full case study. Available from http://ospri.research.gwu.edu/
Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, S. I., Overstreet, J. M., Park, A. (2009). The state of science and mathematics education in state-supported residential academies: A nationwide survey. Roeper Review, 32, 25-31. doi:10.1080/02783190903386579
Google Scholar | Crossref
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology . (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for America’s future. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President.
Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. (2000). One way to organize exploratory curriculum: Academies of inquiry and talent development (Part 1). Middle School Journal, 32(2), 5-14.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stuyvesant High School . (2011). Available from http://www.stuy.edu/
Google Scholar
Subotnik, R. F., Tai, R. H., Almarode, J. (2011, May). Study of the impact of selective SMT high schools: Reflections on learners gifted and motivated in science and mathematics. Paper presented for the Committee on Highly Successful STEM Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
Subotnik, R. F., Tai, R. H., Rickoff, R., Almarode, J. (2009). Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: What do we know now and what will we know in 5 years? Roeper Review, 32, 7-16. doi:10.1080/02783190903386553
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sullins, A. C. (2010). Factors related to student persistence in a new residential STEM high school: The case of the Tennessee Governor’s Academy for Mathematics and Science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nashville, University of Tennessee.
Google Scholar
Swarat, S., Ortony, A., Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 515-537. doi:10.1002/tea.21010
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Texas Academy of Math and Science . (2011). Available from http://tams.unt.edu/
Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Love, B. (2002). NCSSSMST longitudinal study of graduates: A three-year analysis of college freshmen & college seniors. NCSSSMST Journal, 7, 4-8.
Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Williams, C. (2009). The history of specialized STEM schools and the formation and role of the NCSSSMST. Roeper Review, 32, 17-24. doi:10.1080/02783190903386561
Google Scholar | Crossref
U.S. Government Accountability Office . (2005). Higher education: Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics programs and related trends [Report to the Chairman, Committee on Rules, House of Representatives (GAO-06-114)]. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.
Google Scholar
U.S. News and World Report . (2014). National rankings: Best high schools. Retrieved from http://www.usnews.com/education/best-high-schools/national-rankings/page+2
Google Scholar
Young, V. M., House, A., Wang, H., Singleton, C., Klopfenstein, K. (2011, May). Inclusive STEM schools: Early promise in Texas and unanswered questions. Paper presented for the Committee on Highly Successful STEM Schools or Programs for K-12 STEM Education. Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOA-article-ppv for $36.00