Reading instruction often does not focus on appealing to student interests, offering choice, or responding to the needs of advanced readers. In this experimental study, we examined the effects on achievement of an instructional approach involving choice, differentiated instruction, and extensive, supported, independent reading, with corresponding elimination of regular reading instruction. The study, which incorporated multi-site cluster-randomized design, was conducted in four middle schools with 2,150 students and 47 teachers. Pretest and posttest data were collected on reading fluency and comprehension, with Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) procedures used to investigate the effects of the intervention. Results indicated similar results overall for treatment and control group students, with treatment outperforming control on reading fluency at two of the schools. The findings demonstrate that the intervention resulted in similar or higher scores for fluency and similar scores for comprehension, despite the diminished whole-group and small-group instruction provided in the intervention as compared with regular reading classes.

Eckert, L. S. (2008). Bridging the pedagogical gap: Intersections between literary and reading theories in secondary and postsecondary literacy instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 110-118. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.2.2
Google Scholar | Crossref
Greenberg, D., Gilbert, A., Fredrick, L. (2006). Reading interest and behavior in middle school students in inner-city and rural settings. Reading Horizons, 47, 159-173.
Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 1-30. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_2
Google Scholar | Crossref
Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Perencevich, K. C. (2006). From spark to fire: Can situational reading interest lead to long-term reading motivation? Reading Research and Instruction, 45, 91-117. doi:10.1080/19388070609558444
Google Scholar | Crossref
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P. D., Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Hasbrouck, J. E., Tindal, G. (2005). Oral reading fluency: 90 years of measurement. (Technical Report #33). Eugene: University of Oregon.
Google Scholar
Helbling, J., Chancey, J. M., Little, C. A. (2012, April). Measuring middle school students’ reading choices relative to achievement levels. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Google Scholar
Ivey, G., Broaddus, K. (2001). “Just plain reading”: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 350-377. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.4.2
Google Scholar | Crossref
Johnson, D. D., Johnson, B. (2005). High stakes: Poverty, testing, and failure in American Schools (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Kim, J. S., Guryan, J. (2011). Addressing socio-economic disparities in non-cognitive and cognitive skills through summer book reading: Results from a longitudinal randomized experiment. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519116.pdf
Google Scholar
Lewis, C. W., James, M., Hancock, S., Hill-Jackson, V. (2008). Framing African American students’ success and failure in urban settings. Urban Education, 43, 127-153. doi:10.1177/0042085907312315
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Little, C. A., Fogarty, E. A., Reis, S. M. (2005). SEM-R Observation Scale. Storrs: Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading Project, Neag Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Connecticut.
Google Scholar
MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Google Scholar
Meece, J. L., Miller, S. D. (1999). Changes in elementary school children’s achievement goals for reading and writing: Results of a longitudinal and an intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 207-229. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_2
Google Scholar | Crossref
National Assessment of Educational Progress . (2005). The 2005 nation’s report card on reading. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006451
Google Scholar
National Reading Panel . (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Google Scholar
Neuman, S. B., Celano, D. (2001). Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 8-26. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.1.1
Google Scholar | Crossref
Pedulla, J. J., Abrams, L. M., Madaus, G. F., Russell, M. K., Ramos, M. A., Miao, J. (2003). Perceived effects of state-mandated testing programs on teaching and learning: Findings from a national survey of teachers. Chestnut Hill, MA: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy.
Google Scholar
Pitcher, S. M., Albright, L. K., DeLaney, C. J., Walker, N. T., Seunarinesingh, K., Mogge, S., . . . Dunston, P. J. (2007). Assessing adolescents’ motivation to read. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50, 378-396. doi:10.1598/JAAL.50.5.5
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., McKeon, C. A., Wilfong, L. G., Friedauer, J. A., Heim, P. (2005). Is reading fluency a key for successful high school reading? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49, 22-27. doi:10.1598/JAAL.49.1.3
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rasinski, T. V., Rikli, A., Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 350-361. doi:10.1080/19388070802468715
Google Scholar | Crossref
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R., Du Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Google Scholar
Reis, S. M., Eckert, R. D., McCoach, D. B., Jacobs, J. K., Coyne, M. (2008). Using enrichment reading practices to increase reading fluency, comprehension, and attitudes. Journal of Educational Research, 101, 299-314. doi:10.3200/JOER.101.5.299-315
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reis, S. M., Eckert, R. D., Schreiber, F. J., Jacobs, J., Briggs, C., Gubbins, E. J., Muller, L. M. (2005). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model Reading Study (RM05214). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
Google Scholar
Reis, S. M., Fogarty, E. (2006, October). Savoring reading, schoolwide. Educational Leadership, 64, 32-36.
Google Scholar
Reis, S. M., Gubbins, E. J., Briggs, C., Schreiber, F. R., Richards, S., Jacobs, J., . . .Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Reading instruction for talented readers: Case studies documenting few opportunities for continuous progress. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 309-338. doi:10.1177/001698620404800406
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Coyne, M., Schreiber, F. J., Eckert, R. D., Gubbins, E. J. (2007). Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: An evidence-based study. The Elementary School Journal, 108, 3-24. doi:10.1086/522383.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Little, C. A., Muller, L. M., Kaniskan, R. B. (2011). The effects of differentiated instruction and enrichment pedagogy on reading achievement in five elementary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 462-501. doi:10.3102/0002831210382891
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Teale, W. H., Gambrell, L. B. (2007). Raising urban students’ literacy achievement by engaging in authentic, challenging work. The Reading Teacher, 60, 728-739. doi:10.1598/RT.60.8.3
Google Scholar | Crossref
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Unrau, N., Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 81-101. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101
Google Scholar | Crossref
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOA-article-ppv for $36.00