![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Researchers used case study methods to investigate a virtual learning lab (VLL) in a rural school district that was created in 2011 as a way to better meet the unique needs of exceptional students who are considered gifted. Data were collected through focus groups, classroom observations, interviews, and reviewing relevant documents. Topics include an in-depth explication of the learning lab, lessons learned and suggestions by teachers and administrators, and benefits for improved teaching and learning. Findings are that VLL programming, specifically online instruction that takes place in brick-and-mortar public schools, can be an effective means for providing accelerated coursework to exceptional middle school students who are gifted. Benefits include cost-effectiveness, parent and student satisfaction, allowing for individualized work pace in talent area, and others.
Keywords acceleration, gifted, qualitative, technology, talent development, motivation, achievement
References
Section:
|
§ 1003.01, Fla. Stat . (2010). Google Scholar | |
|
Academically Challenging Curriculum to Enhance Learning. (ACCEL) Options, § 1002.3105, Fla. Stat . (2012). Google Scholar | |
|
Adams, C. M., Cross, T. L. (1999). Distance learning opportunities for academically gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(2), 88-96. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Allen, I. E., Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Brulles, D., Winebrenner, S. (2012). Clustered for success. Educational Leadership, 69(5), 41-45. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Clayton Christensen Institute . (2013). Blended-learning universe [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/ Google Scholar | |
|
Common Core State Standards Initiative . (2014). Students who are college and career ready in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/introduction/students-who-are-college-and-career-ready-in-reading-writing-speaking-listening-language/ Google Scholar | |
|
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Digital Learning Now Act, § 1002.321, Fla. Stat . (2011). Google Scholar | |
|
Florida Department of Education . (2012). Understanding FCAT 2.0 reports. Retrieved from http://fcat.fldoe.org/fcat2/pdf/s12uf2r.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Florida Department of Education . (2015). Florida school grades [Data file]. Available from http://schoolgrades.fldoe.org/ Google Scholar | |
|
Florida Legislature, Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability . (1996). Information Brief of Florida’s K-12 Gifted Program (OPPAGA Report No. 95-45). Retrieved from http://www.oppaga.state.fl.us/MonitorDocs/Reports/pdf/9545rpt.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Florida Virtual School . (2013). VLL enrollment percent complete (Report No. 1227). Orlando, FL: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Gentry, M. L., Owen, S. V. (1999). An investigation of the effects of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 224-243. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S. (2012). An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Distance Education, 33, 381-413. doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.723166 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hasler-Waters, L., Leong, P. (2011). New roles for the teacher and learning coach in blended learning for K-12. In Bastiaens, T., Ebner, M. (Eds), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 2716-2725). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Google Scholar | |
|
Krueger, R. A., Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409-425. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 73-77. doi:10.1177/001698629203600204 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Lowenthal, P., Wilson, B. G. (2010). Labels do matter! A critique of AECT’s redefinition of the field. TechTrends, 54(1), 38-46. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Means, B., Bakia, M., Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14, 129-135. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1-19. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S. (2004). Gifted adolescents’ talent development through distance learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 7-35. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Patton, M. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5, Pt. 2), 1189-1208. Available from http://www.hsr.org/ Google Scholar | |
|
Picciano, A. G., Seaman, J., Sloan, C. (2009). K-12 online learning: A 2008 follow-up of the survey of U.S. school district administrators. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Google Scholar | |
|
Plucker, J. A., Callahan, C. M. (2014). Research on giftedness and gifted education status of the field and considerations for the future. Exceptional Children, 80, 390-406. doi:10.1177/0014402914527244 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Queen, B., Lewis, L. (2011). Distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2009–10 (NCES 2012-008). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Google Scholar | |
|
Rauh, J. (2011). Online education as a toll good: An examination of the South Carolina virtual school program. Computers & Education, 57, 1583-1594. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ravaglia, R., Suppes, P., Stillinger, C., Alper, T. (1995). Computer-based mathematics and physics for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 7-13. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Rogers, K. B. (1998). Using current research to make “good” decisions about grouping. National Association for Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 82(595), 38-46. Google Scholar | |
|
Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382-396. doi:10.1177/0016986207306324 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, England: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Stake, R. (1998). Case studies. In Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 86-109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 digital learning: Profiles of emerging models. [White paper]. Mountain View, CA: Clayton Christensen Institute. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-rise-of-K-12-blended-learning.emerging-models.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Staker, H., Horn, M. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning [White paper]. Mountain View, CA: Clayton Christensen Institute. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Classifying-K-12-blended-learning.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Strauss, A. L., Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation, 2001(89), 1-106. doi:10.1002/ev.3 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Thomson, D. L. (2010). Beyond the classroom walls: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on how online earning can meet the needs of gifted students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 662-712. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
VanTassel-Baska, J. (1989). Appropriate curriculum for the gifted. In Feldhusen, J., Van Tassel-Baska, J., Seeley, K. (Eds.), Excellence in educating the gifted (pp. 175-192). Denver, CO: Love. Google Scholar | |
|
Vialle, W., Ashton, T., Vialle, G. (2001). Acceleration: A coat of many colors. Roeper Review, 24, 14-19. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Wallace, P. (2009). Distance learning for gifted students: Outcomes for elementary, middle, and high school aged students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 295-320. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Watson, J. (2008). Blended learning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education. Vienna, VA: North American Council for Online Learning. Google Scholar | |
|
Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., Rapp, C. (2012). Keeping pace with K-12 online & blended learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Durango, CA: Evergreen Education Group. Google Scholar | |
|
Weil, M. (2009). The blended classroom revolution. Technology & Learning, 29(8), 28-32. Google Scholar | |
|
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Zeidner, M., Schleyer, E. J. (1999). The effects of educational context on individual difference variables, self-perceptions of giftedness, and school attitudes of gifted adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 687-705. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
