In this commentary of “Evaluating the Gifted Program of an Urban School District Using a Modified Regression Discontinuity Design” by Davis, Engberg, Epple, Sieg, and Zimmer, we examine the background of the study, critique the methods used, and discuss the results and implications. The study used a fuzzy regression discontinuity design based on an IQ score predicted by the processing speed index and working memory index sub-scores of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC-4) with the outcome of 1- and 2-year retention in the urban district. Results indicate a statistically significant positive relationship between gifted identification and retention, particularly for students not receiving a meal subsidy. Although this study has novelty, particularly in the outcome and in the use of this design in gifted education research, the focus on IQ scores is a methodological and practical limitation, as is the focus on results for higher income families.

Adams, C. M. (2003). An evolving field: Twenty-five years later—Spinning our wheels or moving forward? Roeper Review, 25, 116-117. doi:10.1080/02783190309554212
Google Scholar | Crossref
Adelson, J. L., McCoach, D. B., Gavin, M. K. (2012). Examining the effects of gifted programming in mathematics and reading using the ECLS-K. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 25-39. doi:10.1177/0016986211431487
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Chalak, K., White, H. (2011). An extended class of instrumental variables for the estimation of causal effects. Canadian Journal of Economics, 44, 1-51. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01622.x
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dai, D. Y., Chen, F. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 151-168. doi:10.1177/0016986213490020
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Davis, B., Engberg, J., Epple, D. N., Sieg, H., Zimmer, R. (2010, September). Evaluating the gifted program of an urban school district using a modified regression discontinuity design (Working Paper No. 16414). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Delcourt, M. A. B., Cornell, D. G., Goldberg, M. D. (2007). Cognitive and affective learning outcomes of gifted elementary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 359-381. doi:10.1177/0016986207306320
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ford, D. Y. (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. Journal of Special Education, 32, 4-14. doi:10.1177/002246699803200102
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Matthews, M. S., Peters, S. J., Housand, A. M. (2012). Regression discontinuity design in gifted and talented education research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 105-112. doi:10.1177/0016986212444845
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
McClain, M. C., Pfeiffer, S. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 59-88. doi:10.1080/15377903.2012.643757
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mulhern, J. D. (1978). The gifted child in the regular classroom. Roeper Review, 1, 3-6. doi:10.1080/02783197809552340
Google Scholar | Crossref
National Association for Gifted Children & The Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted . (2015). 2014-2015: State of the states in gifted education: Policy and practice data. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/key%20reports/2014-2015%20State%20of%20the%20States%20%28final%29.pdf
Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A., Burroughs, N., Song, R. (2010, February). Mind the (other) gap! The growing excellence gap in K-12 education. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Center for Evaluation and Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.jkcf.org/assets/1/7/ExcellenceGapBrief_-_Plucker.pdf
Google Scholar
Purcell, J. H. (1995). Gifted education at a crossroads: The program status study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 57-65. doi:10.1177/001698629503900202
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sinharay, S. (2010). How often do subscores have added value? Results from operational simulated data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 150-174. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00106.x
Google Scholar | Crossref
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOA-article-ppv for $36.00