![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Assessment is a crucial component of gifted education. Not only does it facilitate the recognition of the potential and specific needs of gifted students, it also monitors the progress and growth of gifted students, and allows for the evaluation of gifted education programs. In the present review, we synthesize the literature on assessment in gifted education published in the period from 2005 to 2016. We suggest that gifted assessment research has witnessed notable advances, which are apparent in both the extensive range of assessment instruments/methods that now exist and the diverse ways in which assessment data are now used. Future research attention nevertheless appears to be necessary on the optimal approaches to (a) use multiple criteria in gifted identification, (b) address the disproportionate representation of disadvantaged groups in gifted programs, and (c) promote the development of guidelines for gifted program evaluation.
References
Section:
|
Acar, S., Sen, S., Cayirdag, N. (2016). Consistency of the performance and nonperformance methods in gifted identification: A multilevel meta-analytic review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 81-101. doi:10.1177/0016986216634438 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Afrooz, G., Farid, F., Mousavi, M. R., Soveyzi, R. (2014). Construct validity assessment: Convergent type for Stanford Binet and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children in Tehran. Annual Research & Review in Biology, 4, 4400-4412. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Andersen, L. (2014). Visual-spatial ability: Important in STEM, ignored in gifted education. Roeper Review, 36, 114-121. doi:10.1080/02783193.2014.884198 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Assouline, S. G., Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2012). The talent search model of gifted identification. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 45-59. doi:10.1177/0734282911433946 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Bain, S. K., Allin, J. D. (2005). Book review: Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 87-95. doi:10.1177/073428290502300108 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Bain, S. K., Jaspers, K. E. (2010). Review of Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, second edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 167-174. doi:10.1177/0734282909348217 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Baker, E. L. (2003). Multiple measures: Toward tiered systems. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22, 13-17. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00123.x Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Balboni, G., Naglieri, J. A., Cubelli, R. (2010). Concurrent and predictive validity of the Raven Progressive Matrices and the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 222-235. doi:10.1177/0734282909343763 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Beal, A. L. (2011). Insight test of cognitive abilities. Markham, Ontario: Canadian Test Centre. Google Scholar | |
|
Bean, R., Lillenstein, J. (2012). Response to intervention and the changing roles of schoolwide personnel. The Reading Teacher, 65, 491-501. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01073 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bell, N. L., McConnell, J. E., Lassiter, K. S., Matthews, T. D. (2013). The validity of the universal nonverbal intelligence test with the Woodcock Johnson III test of achievement. North American Journal of Psychology, 25, 243-256. Google Scholar | |
|
Bhatt, R. R. (2009). The impacts of gifted and talented education (Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series, 09-11). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1494334 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bianco, D. S. (2010). Improving student outcomes: Data-driven instruction and fidelity of implementation in a Response to Intervention (RTI) model. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 6, 1-13. Google Scholar | |
|
Borghese, P., Gronau, R. C. (2005). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test with limited English proficient Mexican-American elementary students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 128-139. doi:10.1177/073428290502300202 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Borland, J. H. (1997). Evaluating gifted programs. In Colangelo, N., Davis, G. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 253-266). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar | |
|
Borland, J. H. (2003). Evaluating gifted programs: A broader perspective. In Colangelo, N., Davis, G. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 293-310). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar | |
|
Bouzidi, L., Jaillet, A. (2009). Can online peer assessment be trusted? Educational Technology & Society, 12, 257-268. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Bracken, B. A., McCallum, S. (1998). Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing. Google Scholar | |
|
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., Johnsen, S. K. (2010). Test of nonverbal intelligence (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Google Scholar | |
|
Brown, R. T., Reynolds, C. R., Whitaker, J. S. (1999). Bias in mental testing since Bias in Mental Testing. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 208-238. doi:10.1037/h0089007 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Brown, S. W., Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., Siegle, D., Zang, W., Chen, C. H. (2005). Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 68-79. doi:10.1177/001698620504900107 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Bui, S. A., Craig, S. G., Imberman, S. A. (2014). Is gifted education a bright idea? Assessing the impact of gifted and talented programs on students. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6, 30-62. doi:10.1257/pol.6.3.30 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Caffrey, E., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S. (2008). The predictive validity of dynamic assessment a review. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 254-270. doi:10.1177/0022466907310366 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Calero, M. D., Belen, G.-M. M., Robles, M. A. (2011). Learning potential in high IQ children: The contribution of dynamic assessment to the identification of gifted children. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 176-181. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.025 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Callahan, C. M. (2004). Asking the right questions: The central issue in evaluating programs for the gifted and talented. In Callahan, C. M., Reis, S. M. (Eds.), Program evaluation in gifted education (pp. 1-12). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Canivez, G. L. (2014). Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: Direct versus indirect hierarchical structures. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 38-51. doi:10.1037/spq0000032 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Card, D., Giuliano, L. (2015). Can universal screening increase the representation of low income and minority students in gifted education? (No. w21519). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21519.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Carman, C. A., Taylor, D. K. (2010). Socioeconomic status effects on using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) to identify the gifted/talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 75-84. doi:10.1177/0016986209355976 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Chaffey, G. W., Bailey, S. B., Vine, K. W. (2015). Identifying high academic potential in Australian Aboriginal children using dynamic testing. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 24, 24-37. Google Scholar | |
|
Chan, D. W. (2000). Exploring identification procedures of gift education students by teacher ratings: Parent ratings and students self-reports in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 11, 69-82. doi:10.1080/713669176 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Chan, D. W. (2009). Dimensionality and typology of perfectionism: The use of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale with Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 174-187. doi:10.1177/0016986209334963 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Chang, H. H. (2015). Psychometrics behind computerized adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 80, 1-20. doi:10.1007/s11336-014-9401-5 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Chart, H., Grigorenko, E. L., Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Identification: The Aurora Battery. In Plucker, J. A., Callahan, C. M. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 345-365). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Cho, E., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B. (2014). Examining the predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of decoding to forecast response to Tier 2 intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 409-423. doi:10.1177/0022219412466703 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Čisar, S. M., Čisar, P., Pinter, R. (2016). Evaluation of knowledge in object oriented programming course with computer adaptive tests. Computers & Education, 92, 142-160. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.016 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Čisar, S. M., Radosav, D., Markoski, B., Pinter, R., Čisar, P. (2010). Computer adaptive testing of student knowledge. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 7, 139-152. Google Scholar | |
|
Climie, E. A., Rostad, K. (2011). Test review: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 581-586. doi:10.1177/0734282911408707 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Coleman, M. R., Hughes, C. E. (2009). Meeting the needs of gifted students within an RtI framework. Gifted Child Today, 32, 14-17. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Colorado Department of Education . (2008). Response to intervention: A practitioner’s guide to implementation. Denver: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Colp, S. M., Nordstokke, D. W. (2014). Test review: Insight test of cognitive abilities. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29, 71-78. doi:10.1177/0829573514521787 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Cook, D. A. (2010). Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs. Medical Teacher, 32, 296-301. doi:10.3109/01421590903480121 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Crepeau-Hobson, F., Bianco, M. (2011). Identification of gifted students with learning disabilities in a response-to-intervention era. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 102-109. doi:10.1002/pits.20528 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Crepeau-Hobson, F., Bianco, M. (2013). Response to intervention promises and pitfalls for gifted students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48, 142-151. doi:10.1177/1053451212454005 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Dai, D. Y., Steenbergen-Hu, S. (2015). Special class for the gifted young: A 34-year experimentation with early college entrance programs in China. Roeper Review, 37, 9-18. doi:10.1080/02783193.2014.975882 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Dai, D. Y., Steenbergen-Hu, S., Zhou, Y. (2015). Cope and grow: A grounded theory approach to early college entrants’ lived experiences and changes in a STEM program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 75-90. doi:10.1177/0016986214568719 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Dai, D. Y., Swanson, J. A., Cheng, H. (2011). State of research on giftedness and gifted education: A survey of empirical studies published during 1998—2010 (April). Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 126-138. doi:10.1177/0016986210397831 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Dal Vesco, Á., Mattos, D., Benincá, C., Tarasconi, C. (1998). Correlation between WISC and school performance in public and private schools. Psicologia: Reflexão E Crítica, 11, 481-495. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Dang, H.-M., Weiss, B., Pollack, A., Nguyen, M. C. (2012). Adaptation of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV (WISC-IV) for Vietnam. Psychological Studies, 56, 387-392. doi:10.1007/s12646-011-0099-5 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Department for Education and Child Development South Australia . (2016). Policy statement gifted and talented children and students policy. Retrieved from https://www.decd.sa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net691/f/gifted-talented-students-policy.pdf?v=1467090054 Google Scholar | |
|
Dombrowski, S. C., Mrazik, M. (2008). RIAS: Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 23, 223-230. doi:10.1177/0829573508324458 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Erwin, J. O., Worrell, F. C. (2012). Assessment practices and the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 74-87. doi:10.1177/0734282911428197 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., Whiting, G. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74, 289-306. doi:10.1177/001440290807400302 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Foreman, J. L., Gubbins, E. J. (2015). Teachers see what ability scores cannot: Predicting student performance with challenging mathematics. Journal of Advanced Academics, 26, 5-23. doi:10.1177/1932202X14552279 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Frechtling, J. A. (2007). Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Frye, A. W., Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. Medical Teacher, 34, e288-e299. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., Caffrey, E. (2011). The construct and predictive validity of a dynamic assessment of young children learning to read: Implications for RTI frameworks. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 339-347. doi:10.1177/0022219411407864 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gallagher, J. J. (2006). According to Jim Gallagher: How to shoot oneself in the foot with program evaluation. Roeper Review, 28, 122-124. doi:10.1080/02783190609554350 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Geiser, C., Mandelman, S. D., Tan, M., Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). Multitrait–multimethod assessment of giftedness: An application of the correlated traits–correlated (methods–1) model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 76-90. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.937792 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gentry, M. L., Pereira, N., Peters, S. J., McIntosh, J. S., Fugate, C. M. (2015). HOPE Teacher Rating Scale (manual): Involving teachers in equitable identification of gifted and talented students in K-12. Waco, TX: Prufrock. Google Scholar | |
|
Giessman, J. A., Gambrell, J. L., Stebbins, M. S. (2013). Minority performance on the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test versus the Cognitive Abilities Test, Form 6: One gifted program’s experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 101-109. doi:10.1177/0016986213477190 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Gilliam, J. E., Jerman, O. (2015). Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales: A norm-referenced procedure for identifying gifted and talented students [Assessment Instrument] (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Google Scholar | |
|
Greenberg, L. (1955). A critique of classic methods of identifying gifted children. The School Review, 63, 25-30. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Grégoire, J. (2001). Factor structure of the French adaptation of the WISC-III: Three or four factors. International Journal of Testing, 1, 271-281. doi:10.1080/15305058.2001.9669475 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Harrison, A. G., Holmes, A., Silvestri, R., Armstrong, I. T. (2015). Implications for educational classification and psychological diagnoses using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition with Canadian versus American norms. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 299-311. doi:10.1177/0734282915573723 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Hartas, D., Lindsay, G., Muijs, D. (2008). Identifying and selecting able students for the NAGTY summer school: Emerging issues and future considerations. High Ability Studies, 19, 5-18. doi:10.1080/13598130801980265 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hunsaker, S. L. (2000). Documenting gifted program results for key decision-makers. Roeper Review, 23, 80-82. doi:10.1080/02783190009554070 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hunt, E. (2010). Human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hurks, P., Hendriksen, J., Dek, J., Kooij, A. (2016). Accuracy of short forms of the Dutch Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of intelligence: Third edition. Assessment, 23, 240-249. doi:10.1177/1073191115577189 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Irwin, J. K., Joschko, M., Kerns, K. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS) in Canadian children. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 1258-1277. doi:10.1080/13854046.2014.975843 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Jamieson, J. (2005). Trends in computer-based second language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 228-242. doi:10.1017/S0267190505000127 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S. I., Morris, J. A. (2002). Identifying gifted students using Teacher Rating Scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322-336. doi:10.1177/073428290202000401 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Johnsen, S. K., Parker, S. L., Farah, Y. N. (2015). Providing services for students with gifts and talents within a response-to-intervention framework. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47, 226-233. doi:10.1177/0040059915569358 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Jung, J. Y., Barnett, K., Gross, M. U., McCormick, J. (2011). Levels of intellectual giftedness, culture, and the forced-choice dilemma. Roeper Review, 33, 182-197. doi:10.1080/02783193.2011.580501 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Jung, J. Y., Worrell, F. C. (2017). School psychological practice with gifted students. In Thielking, M., Terjesen, M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Australian school psychology: Integrating international research, practice, and policy (pp. 575-593). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45166-4_29 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L. (1983). K-ABC: Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services. Google Scholar | |
|
Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L. (1990). Manual for the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. Google Scholar | |
|
Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, second edition. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Kaufman, S. B., Reynolds, M. R., Liu, X., Kaufman, A. S., McGrew, K. S. (2012). Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock-Johnson and Kaufman tests. Intelligence, 40, 123-138. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.009 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kaya, F. (2013). The role of peer nomination forms in the identification of lower elementary gifted and talented students. Educational Research and Review, 8, 2260-2269. doi:10.5897/ERR2013.1674 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kaya, F., Delen, E. (2014). A computer-based peer nomination form to identify gifted and talented students. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 23, 29-36. doi:122851309921044 Google Scholar | |
|
King, E., Coleman, M. R., Miller, A. (2011). Response to intervention: The changing role of school psychologists in relation to gifted students. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27, 341-358. doi:10.1080/15377903.2011.616578 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kirkpatrick, D. (1996). Great ideas revisited. Training and Development, 50, 54-59. Google Scholar | |
|
Kruyen, P. M., Emons, W. H., Sijtsma, K. (2013). On the shortcomings of shortened tests: A literature review. International Journal of Testing, 13, 223-248. doi:10.1080/15305058.2012.703734 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
LaForte, E. M., McGrew, K. S., Schrank, F. A. (2014). WJ IV technical abstract (Woodcock-Johnson IV Assessment Service Bulletin No. 2). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing. Google Scholar | |
|
Lakin, J. M. (2016). Universal screening and the representation of historically underrepresented minority students in gifted education: Minding the gaps in Card and Giuliano’s research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27, 139-149. doi:10.1177/1932202X16630348 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lakin, J. M., Gambrell, J. L. (2012). Distinguishing verbal, quantitative, and figural facets of fluid intelligence in young students. Intelligence, 40, 560-570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.07.005 Google Scholar | |
|
Lakin, J. M., Lohman, D. F. (2011). The predictive accuracy of verbal, quantitative, and nonverbal reasoning tests: Consequences for talent identification and program diversity. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 595-623. doi:10.1177/016235321103400404 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lecerf, T., Rossier, J., Favez, N., Reverte, I., Coleaux, L. (2010). The four-vs. alternative six-factor structure of the French WISC-IV-comparison using confirmatory factor analyses. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 221-232. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000026 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lee, D., Pfeiffer, S. I. (2006). The reliability and validity of a Korean-translated version of the Gifted Ratings Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 210-224. doi:10.1177/0734282906287829 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Li, H., Lee, D., Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y. (2008). Parent ratings using the Chinese version of the Parent Gifted Rating Scales–School form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 659-675. doi:10.1177/0013164407313365 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Li, H., Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., Kumtepe, A. T., Mo, G. (2008). Validation of the Gifted Rating Scales—School Form in China. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 160-169. doi:10.1177/0016986208315802 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lidz, C. S., Elliott, J. G. (2006). Use of dynamic assessment with gifted students. Gifted Education International, 21, 151-161. doi:10.1177/026142940602100307 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lidz, C. S., Macrine, S. L. (2001). An alternative approach to the identification of gifted culturally and linguistically diverse learners: The contribution of dynamic assessment. School Psychology International, 22, 74-96. doi:10.1177/01430343010221006 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lohman, D. F. (2005a). An aptitude perspective on talent: Implications for identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 333-360. doi:10.4219/jeg-2005-341 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Lohman, D. F. (2005b). Review of Naglieri and Ford (2003): Does the Naglieri nonverbal ability test identify equal proportions of high-scoring White, Black, and Hispanic students? Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 19-28. doi:10.1177/001698620504900103 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Lohman, D. F. (2011). Cognitive Abilities Test, form 7 (CogAT7). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing. Google Scholar | |
|
Lohman, D. F. (2012). Decision strategies. In Hunsaker, S. L. (Ed.), Identification: The theory and practice of identifying students for gifted and talented education services (pp. 217-248). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lohman, D. F., Gambrell, J. L. (2012). Using nonverbal tests to help identify academically talented children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 25-44. doi:10.1177/0734282911428194 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Lohman, D. F., Korb, K. A., Lakin, J. M. (2008). Identifying academically gifted English-language learners using nonverbal tests: A comparison of the Raven, NNAT, and CogAT. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 275-296. doi:10.1177/0016986208321808 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 41-50. doi: 10.1177/001698629604000106 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Masters, G. N. (2013). Reforming educational assessment: Imperatives, principles and challenges. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/geoff_masters/156/ Google Scholar | |
|
McBee, M. T. (2006). A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 103-111. doi:10.4219/jsge-2006-686 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
McBee, M. T. (2010b). Modeling outcomes with floor or ceiling effects: An introduction to the Tobit model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 314-320. doi:10.1177/0016986210379095 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
McBee, M. T., Peters, S. J., Miller, E. M. (2016). The impact of the nomination stage on gifted program identification: A comprehensive psychometric analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 258-278. doi:10.1177/0016986216656256 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
McBee, M. T., Peters, S. J., Waterman, C. (2014). Combining scores in multiple criteria assessment systems: The impact of combination rule. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 69-89. doi:10.1177/0016986213513794 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
McCallum, R. S., Bell, S. M., Coles, J. T., Miller, K. C., Hopkins, M. B., Hilton-Prillhart, A. (2013). A model for screening twice-exceptional students (gifted with learning disabilities) within a response to intervention paradigm. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 209-222. doi:10.1177/0016986213500070 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
McCarney, S. B., Anderson, P. D. (1998). Gifted Evaluation Scale: Technical manual (2nd ed.). Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services. Google Scholar | |
|
McCarney, S. B., Arthaud, T. J. (2009). Gifted evaluation scale third edition (GES-3). Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services. Google Scholar | |
|
McClain, M. C., Pfeiffer, S. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 59-88. doi:10.1080/15377903.2012.643757 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
McCoach, D. B., Rambo, K. E., Welsh, M. (2013). Assessing the growth of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 56-67. doi:10.1177/0016986212463873 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
McCoach, D. B., Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 246-254. doi:10.1177/0016986207302719 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
McCrimmon, A. W., Smith, A. D. (2013). Test review: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, second edition (WASI-II). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 337-341. doi:10.1177/0734282912467756 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
McGowan, M. R., Holtzman, D. R., Coyne, T. B., Miles, K. L. (2016). Predictive ability of the SB5 gifted composite versus the full-scale IQ among children referred for gifted evaluations. Roeper Review, 38, 40-49. doi:10.1080/02783193.2015.1112864 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
McGowan, M. R., Runge, T. J., Pedersen, J. A. (2016). Using curriculum-based measures for identifying gifted learners. Roeper Review, 38, 93-106. doi:10.1080/02783193.2016.1150376 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Miller, C. A., Gilbert, E. (2008). Comparison of performance on two nonverbal intelligence tests by adolescents with and without language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 358-371. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.02.003 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Minton, B. A., Pratt, S. (2006). Gifted and highly gifted students: How do they score on the SB5? Roeper Review, 28, 232-236. doi:10.1080/02783190609554369 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Murphy, R., Maree, D. J. F. (2006). A review of South African research in the field of dynamic assessment. South African Journal of Psychology, 36, 1038-1061. doi:10.1177/008124630603600110 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Naglieri, J. A. (2008). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test: Multilevel form technical report. San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Naglieri, J. A., Brulles, D., Landsdowne, K. (2008). Helping all gifted children learn: A teacher’s guide to using the NNAT2. San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Naglieri, J. A., Ford, D. Y. (2015). Misconceptions about the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test: A commentary of concerns and disagreements. Roeper Review, 37, 234-240. doi:10.1080/02783193.2015.1077497 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
National Association for Gifted Children . (2010). The pre-K-grade 12 gifted programming standards. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/standards/K-12%20programming%20standards.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
National Association for Gifted Children . (2015). 2014-2015 state of the states in gifted education: Policy and practice data. Retrieved from http://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/key%20reports/2014-2015%20State%20of%20the%20States%20%28final%29.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Nazari, B., Mansouri, S. (2014). Dynamic assessment versus static assessment: A study of reading comprehension ability in Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10, 134-156. Google Scholar | |
|
Neber, H. (2004). Teacher identification of students for gifted programs: Nominations to a summer school for highly-gifted students. Psychology Science, 46, 348-362. Google Scholar | |
|
Nelson, J. M., Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W. (2013). Structural and incremental validity of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–fourth edition with a clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 25, 618-630. doi:10.1037/a0032086 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
New South Wales Department of Education and Training . (2004). Policy and implementation strategies for the education of gifted and talented students. Retrieved from https://education.nsw.gov.au/policy-library/associated-documents/polimp.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Newton, J. H., McIntosh, D. E., Dixon, F., Williams, T., Youman, E. (2008). Giftedness in children: Comparing the accuracy of three shortened measures of intelligence to the Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales, fifth edition. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 523-536. doi:10.1002/pits.20321 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Nitko, A. J., Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Oakland, T., Rossen, E. (2005). A 21st century model for identifying students for gifted and talented programs in light of national conditions: An emphasis on race and ethnicity. Gifted Child Today, 28, 56-64. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Talent search: Purposes, rationale, and role in gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 106-113. doi: 10.1177/1932202X9800900303 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Lee, S. Y. (2011). Gender and other group differences in performance on off-level tests: Changes in the 21st century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 54-73. doi:10.1177/0016986210382574 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Parliament of Victoria Education and Training Committee . (2012). Inquiry into the education of gifted and talented students. Retrieved from http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/committees/etc/Past_Inquiries/EGTS_Inquiry/Final_Report/Gifted_and_Talented_Final_Report.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Patton, M. Q. (2003). Utilization-focused evaluation. In Kellaghan, T., Stufflebeam, D. L. (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 223-242). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_15 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Paulhus, D. L., Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C., Krueger, R. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224-239). New York, NY: Guilford. Google Scholar | |
|
Paunonen, S. V., O’Neill, T. A. (2010). Self-reports, peer ratings and construct validity. European Journal of Personality, 24, 189-206. doi:10.1002/per.751 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Peters, S. J., Gentry, M. (2010). Multigroup construct validity evidence of the HOPE Scale: Instrumentation to identify low-income elementary students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 298-313. doi:10.1177/0016986210378332 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Peters, S. J., Gentry, M. (2012a). Additional validity evidence and across-group equivalency of the HOPE Teacher Rating Scale. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 85-100. doi:10.1177/0016986212469253 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Peters, S. J., Gentry, M. (2012b). Group-specific norms and Teacher-Rating Scales: Implications for underrepresentation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23, 125-144. doi:10.1177/1932202X12438717 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Petscher, Y., Li, H. (2007). Measurement invariance of the Chinese Gifted Rating Scales: Teacher and parent forms. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26, 274-286. doi:10.1177/0734282907303873 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2015). Essentials of gifted assessment. New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Pfeiffer, S. I., Blei, S. (2008). Gifted identification beyond the IQ test: Rating scales and other assessment procedures. In Pfeiffer, S. I. (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 177-198). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_10 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pfeiffer, S. I., Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted rating scales. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Google Scholar | |
|
Pfeiffer, S. I., Jarosewich, T. (2007). The Gifted Rating Scales-School form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, race, and diagnostic efficiency. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 39-50. doi:10.1177/0016986206296658 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y. (2008). Identifying young gifted children using the Gifted Rating Scales-Preschool/Kindergarten form. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 19-29. doi:10.1177/0016986207311055 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y., Jarosewich, T. (2007). The Gifted Rating Scales—Preschool/Kindergarten form: An analysis of the standardization sample based on age, gender, and race. Roeper Review, 29, 206-211. doi:10.1080/02783190709554410 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Pierson, E. E., Kilmer, L. M., Rothlisberg, B. A., McIntosh, D. E. (2012). Use of brief intelligence tests in the identification of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 10-24. doi:10.1177/0734282911428193 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Prifitera, A., Saklofske, D. H., Weiss, L. G. (2005). WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation: Scientist practitioner perspectives. New York, NY: Elsevier. Google Scholar | |
|
Pyryt, M. C. (2004). Pegnato revisited: Using discriminant analysis to identify gifted children. Psychology Science, 46, 342-347. Google Scholar | |
|
Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., McCoach, D. B. (2015). High-achieving and average students’ reading growth: Contrasting school and summer trajectories. The Journal of Educational Research, 10, 112-129. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.850398 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., Warne, R. T. (2015). Measuring the outliers: An introduction to out-of-level testing with high-achieving students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47, 199-207. doi:10.1177/0040059915569359 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Raven, J. C. (1938). Guide to progressive matrices. London, England: H. K. Lewis. Google Scholar | |
|
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., Court, J. H. (2003). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. Google Scholar | |
|
Renaissance Learning . (2016). Key report samples: Star assessments. Retrieved from http://doc.renlearn.com/KMNet/R0053249615EE616.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Renteria, L., Li, S. T., Pliskin, N. H. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Spanish language Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale in a sample of American, Urban, Spanish-speaking Hispanics. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 455-470. doi:10.1080/13854040701336428 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Renzulli, J. S., Gaesser, A. H. (2015). A multi criteria system for the identification of high achieving and creative/productive giftedness. Revista de Educación, 368, 96-131. doi:10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-290 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Renzulli, J. S., Siegle, D., Gavin, M. K., Reed, R. E. S. (2009). An investigation of the reliability and factor structure of four new Scales for Rating the Behavioural Characteristics of superior students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 84-108. doi:10.1177/1932202X0902100105 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H. (1977). Two approaches to identification of gifted students. Exceptional Children, 43, 512-518. doi:10.1177/001440297704300804 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students: Revised edition. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Reynolds, C. R. (2000). Why is psychometric research on bias in mental testing so often ignored? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 144-150. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.144 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Reynolds, C. R., Kamphaus, R. W. (2003). Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Google Scholar | |
|
Reynolds, C. R., Suzuki, L. (2013). Bias in psychological assessment: An empirical review and recommendations. In Graham, J. R., Naglieri, J. A., Weiner, I. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, volume 10: Assessment psychology (2nd ed., pp. 82-113). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Reynolds, M. R., Keith, T. Z., Flanagan, D. P., Alfonso, V. C. (2013). A cross-battery, reference variable, confirmatory factor analytic investigation of the CHC taxonomy. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 535-555. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.003 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Reynolds, M. R., Niileksela, C. R. (2015). Test review: Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV tests of cognitive abilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 381-390. doi:10.1177/0734282915571408 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Rimm, S., Gilman, B. J., Silverman, L. K. (2008). Non-traditional applications of traditional testing. In VanTassel-Baska, J. (Ed.), Alternative assessment with gifted and talented students (pp. 175-202). Waco, TX: Prufrock. Google Scholar | |
|
Roid, G., Barram, R. (2004). Essentials of Stanford–Binet Intelligence Scales (SB5) assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Rosado, J. I., Pfeiffer, S. I., Petscher, Y. (2015). Identifying gifted students in Puerto Rico: Validation of a Spanish translation of the Gifted Rating Scales. Gifted Education International, 31, 162-175. doi:10.1177/0261429413507178 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Rowe, E. W., Dandridge, J., Pawlush, A., Thompson, D. F., Ferrier, D. E. (2014). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the WISC-IV with gifted students. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 536-552. doi:10.1037/spq0000009 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Ruf, D. L. (2009). Five levels of gifted: School issues and educational options. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Ryser, G. R. (2004). Qualitative and quantitative approaches to assessments. In Johnsen, S. K. (Ed.), Identifying gifted students: A practical guide (pp. 23-40). Waco, TX: Prufrock. Google Scholar | |
|
Ryser, G. R. (2011). Fairness in testing and nonbiased assessment. In Johnsen, S. K. (Ed.), Identifying gifted students: A practical guide (2nd ed., pp. 63-74). Waco, TX: Prufrock. Google Scholar | |
|
Ryser, G. R., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E. (2014). Using growth models to measure school performance: Implications for gifted learners. Gifted Child Today, 37, 17-23. doi:10.1177/1076217513509617 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Saklofske, D. H., Gorsuch, R. L., Weiss, L. G., Zhu, J. J., Patterson, C. A. (2005). General ability index for the WAIS–III: Canadian norms. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37, 44-48. doi:10.1037/h0087244 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sarouphim, K. M. (2000). Internal structure of DISCOVER: A performance-based assessment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 314-27. doi:EJ609790 Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Sarouphim, K. M. (2001). DISCOVER: Concurrent validity, gender differences, and identification of minority students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 130-138. doi:10.1177/001698620104500206 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Sarouphim, K. M. (2009). The use of a performance assessment for identifying gifted Lebanese students: Is DISCOVER effective? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 275-295. doi:10.1177/016235320903300206 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Sarouphim, K. M., Maker, C. J. (2010). Ethnic and gender differences in identifying gifted students: A multi-cultural analysis. International Education, 39, 42-56, 76-77. Google Scholar | |
|
Scantron Corporation . (2014). A parent’s guide to performance series. Retrieved from https://www.olmc-school.com/DioceseOfRichmond.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Schafer, W. D., Lissitz, R. W., Zhu, X., Zhang, Y., Hou, X., Li, Y. (2012). Evaluating teachers and schools using student growth models. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17. Retrieved from http://www.pareonline.net/pdf/v17n17.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Schipolowski, S., Schroeders, U., Wilhelm, O. (2014). Pitfalls and challenges in constructing short forms of cognitive ability measures. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 190-200. doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000134 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Schneider, W. J., McGrew, K. (2012). The Cattell–Horn–Carroll model of intelligence. In Flanagan, D., Harrison, P. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 99-144). New York, NY: Guilford. Google Scholar | |
|
Schrank, F. A., Mather, N., McGrew, K. S. (2014). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of achievement. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing. Google Scholar | |
|
Siegle, D., Moore, M., Mann, R. L., Wilson, H. E. (2010). Factors that influence in-service and preservice teachers’ nominations of students for gifted and talented programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 337-360. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Silverman, L. K. (1978). Characteristics of giftedness. Colorado Association for the Gifted and Talented Newsletter, 5, 8. Retrieved from http://www.visualspatial.org/files/chargt.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Silverman, L. K. (2009). The measurement of giftedness. In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 947-970). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Silverman, W., Miezejeski, C., Ryan, R., Zigman, W., Krinsky-McHale, S., Urv, T. (2010). Stanford–Binet and WAIS IQ differences and their implications for adults with intellectual disability (aka mental retardation). Intelligence, 38, 242-248. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.12.005 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Smith, G. T., Combs, J. L., Pearson, C. M. (2012). Brief instruments and short forms. In Cooper, H., Camic, P. M., Long, D. L., Panter, A. T., Rindskopf, D., Sher, K. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 395-409). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13619-021 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Stecher, B. (2010). Performance assessment in an era of standards-based educational accountability. Stanford, CA: Standford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian_Stecher/publication/265237569_Performance_Assessment_in_an_Era_of_Standards-Based_Educational_Accountability/links/5489bf4c0cf225bf669c725b.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Stone, E., Davey, T. (2011). Computer-adaptive testing for students with disabilities: A review of the literature. ETS Research Report Series, 2011, i-24. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02268.x Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Stufflebeam, D. L., Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
Swiatek, M. A. (2007). The talent search model: Past, present, and future. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 320-329. doi:10.1177/0016986207306318 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Syeda, M. M., Climie, E. A. (2014). Test review: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of intelligence. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 265-272. doi:10.1177/0734282913508620 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
te Nijenhuis, J., Al-Shahomee, A. A., van den Hoek, M., Grigoriev, A., Repko, J. (2015). Spearman’s hypothesis tested comparing Libyan adults with various other groups of adults on the items of the standard progressive matrices. Intelligence, 50, 114-117. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.03.001 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: The mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Tiekstra, M., Minnaert, A., Hessels, M. G. (2016). A review scrutinising the consequential validity of dynamic assessment. Educational Psychology, 36, 112-137. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.915930 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Tourón, J., Tourón, M. (2011). The center for talented youth identification model: A review of the literature. Talent Development & Excellence, 3, 187-202. Google Scholar | |
|
Tourón, J., Tourón, M. (2016). Identification of verbal and mathematical talent: The relevance of “out of level” measurement. Anales de Psicología, 32, 638-651. doi:10.6018/analesps.32.3.259401 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
van Aken, L., van der Heijden, P. T., van der Veld, W. M., Hermans, L., Kessels, R. P., Egger, J. I. (2015). Representation of the Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory of cognitive abilities in the factor structure of the Dutch-language version of the WAIS-IV. Assessment, 24, 458-466. doi:10.1177/1073191115607973 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2004). Metaevaluation findings: A call for gifted program quality. In VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A. X. (Eds.), Designing and utilizing evaluation for gifted program improvement (pp. 227-245). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press. Google Scholar | |
|
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2014). Performance-based assessment: The road to authentic learning for the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 37, 41-47. doi:10.1177/1076217513509618 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A. X., Evans, B. L. (2007). Patterns of identification and performance among gifted students identified through performance tasks a three-year analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 218-231. doi:10.1177/0016986207302717 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Vazire, S., Mehl, M. R. (2008). Knowing me, knowing you: The accuracy and unique predictive validity of self-ratings and other ratings of daily behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1202-1216. doi:10.1037/a0013314 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Vista, A., Grantham, T. C. (2009). Transferability of norms and its implication in cross-cultural gifted education: Norming Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) in the Philippine public schools. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 8, 111-121. doi:10.1007/s10671-009-9065-6 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Walrath, R. (2014). Test review: Insight test of cognitive abilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 567-572. doi:10.1177/0734282914525027 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Warne, R. T. (2009). Comparing tests used to identify ethnically diverse gifted children: A critical response to Lewis, DeCamp-Fritson, Ramage, McFarland, & Archwamety. Multicultural Education, 17, 48-53. Google Scholar | |
|
Warne, R. T. (2012). History and development of above-level testing of the gifted. Roeper Review, 34, 183-193. doi:10.1080/02783193.2012.686425 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Warne, R. T. (2014). Using above-level testing to track growth in academic achievement in gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 3-23. doi:10.1177/0016986213513793 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Warne, R. T. (2015). Five reasons to put the g back into giftedness: An argument for applying the Cattell–Horn–Carroll theory of intelligence to gifted education research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60, 3-15. doi:10.1177/0016986215605360 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Warne, R. T., Anderson, B., Johnson, A. O. (2013). The impact of race and ethnicity on the identification process for giftedness in Utah. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 487-508. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Warne, R. T., Doty, K. J., Malbica, A. M., Angeles, V. R., Innes, S., Hall, J., . . .Masterson-Nixon, K. (2016). Above-level test item functioning across examinee age groups. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34, 54-72. doi:10.1177/0734282915584851 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Google Scholar | |
|
Wechsler, D. (2006). Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of ability: WNV (Petermann, F. , Ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Google Scholar | |
|
Wechsler, D. (2012). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of intelligence (4th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children (5th ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Wechsler, D., Coalson, D. L., Raiford, S. E. (2008). WAIS-IV: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Wechsler, D., Hsiao-Pin, C. (2011). WASI-II: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of intelligence (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Wechsler, D., Naglieri, J. A. (2006). Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of ability: Technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Google Scholar | |
|
Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37, 70-84. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Prifitera, A., Holdnack, J. A. (2006). WISC-IV advanced clinical interpretation. Burlington, MA: Academic Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Wellisch, M., Brown, J. (2012). An integrated identification and intervention model for intellectually gifted children. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23, 145-167. doi:10.1177/1932202X12438877 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Whiting, G. W., Ford, D. Y. (2006). Under-representation of diverse students in gifted education: Recommendations for nondiscriminatory assessment (Part 2). Gifted Education Press Quarterly, 20, 6-10. Google Scholar | |
|
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing. Google Scholar | |
|
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., Schenk, F. A. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson III normative update technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing. Google Scholar | |
|
Worrell, F. C. (2013). Identifying gifted learners: Nonverbal assessment. In Callahan, C. M., Hertberg-Davis, H. (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 135-147). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Xin, H. (Ed.). (2008). Special class for the gifted young, USTC: From 1978 to 2008. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Yarnell, J. B., Pfeiffer, S. I. (2014). Internet administration of the paper-and-pencil Gifted Rating Scale assessing psychometric equivalence. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33, 534-543. doi:10.1177/0734282914564039 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Yssel, N., Adams, C., Clarke, L. S., Jones, R. (2014). Applying an RTI model for students with learning disabilities who are gifted. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 42-52. doi:10.1177/004005991404600305 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Zenisky, A. L., Sireci, S. G. (2002). Technological innovations in large-scale assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 337-362. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1504_02 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ziegler, A., Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In Heller, K. A., Monks, F. J., Sternberg, R. J., Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 3-21). Oxford, UK: Pergamon. Google Scholar | Crossref |
