![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Numbers of women in the physical sciences, mathematics, and engineering are growing, yet women are still far outnumbered by men at upper levels of those fields. The purpose of the study is to review the literature on academic women who develop exceptional talent in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Data sources included 18 scholarly publications selected according to a systematic protocol. Analysis of the studies’ Results and Findings sections yielded four major themes focused on women’s personal and psychological characteristics, social catalysts, institutional catalysts, and cultural production. Themes were synthesized into a four-level socio-ecological model of women’s STEM talent development. Implications for future research are discussed.
Keywords women, academia, science, STEM, talent development
References
Section:
|
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard. Google Scholar | |
|
Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
*Buday, S., Stake, J., Peterson, Z. (2012). Gender and the choice of a science career: The impact of social support and possible selves. Sex Roles, 66, 197-209. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0015-4 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
*Carlone, H. B., Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187-1218. doi:10.1002/tea.20237 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
*Charleston, L. J., George, P. L., Jackson, J. F. L., Berhanu, J., Amechi, M. H. (2014). Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of black women in U.S. computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7, 166-176. doi:10.1037/a0036632 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Chesler, N. C., Barabino, G., Bhatia, S. N., Richards-Kortum, R. (2010). The pipeline still leaks and more than you think: A status report on gender diversity in biomedical engineering. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 38, 1928-1935. doi:10.1007/s10439-010-9958-9 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Corbett, C., Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing. Retrieved from American Association of University Women website: http://www.aauw.org/files/2015/03/Solving-the-Equation-report-nsa.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
*Dabney, K. P., Tai, R. H. (2014). Factors associated with female chemist doctoral career choice within the physical sciences. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1777-1786. doi:10.1021/ed4008815 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dai, D. Y., Chen, F. (2014). Paradigms of gifted education: A guide for theory-based, practice-focused research. Waco, TX: Prufrock. Google Scholar | |
|
Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., Neuschatz, M., Uzzi, B. (1992). Athena unbound: Barriers to women in academic science and engineering. Science and Public Policy, 19, 157-179. doi:10.1093/spp/19.3.157 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
*Feist, G. (2006). The development of scientific talent in Westinghouse finalists and members of the national academy of sciences. Journal of Adult Development, 13, 23-35. doi:10.1007/s10804-006-9002-3 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
*Ferriman, K., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2009). Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 517-532. doi:10.1037/a0016030 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory1. High Ability Studies, 15, 119–147. doi:10.1080/1359813042000314682 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
*Gavin, M. K. (1996). The development of math talent: Influences on students at a women’s college. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 476-485. doi:10.1177/1932202x9600700406 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
*George-Jackson, C. E. (2014). Undergraduate women’s persistence in the sciences. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 7, 96-119. doi:10.1515/njawhe-2014-0006 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Heilbronner, N. N. (2013). The STEM pathway for women: What has changed? Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 39-55. doi:10.1177/0016986212460085 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Herman, C. (2015). Rebooting and rerouting: Women’s articulations of frayed careers in science, engineering and technology professions. Gender, Work & Organization, 22, 324-338. doi:10.1111/gwao.12088 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
*Herzig, A. (2004). Becoming mathematicians: Women and students of color choosing and leaving doctoral mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 74, 171-214. doi:10.3102/00346543074002171 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2014). Feminist research practice: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Hewlett, S. A., Luce, C. B., Servon, L. J. (2008, June). Stopping the exodus of women in science. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2008/06/stopping-the-exodus-of-women-in-science Google Scholar | |
|
Hill, C., Corbett, C., St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. Google Scholar | |
|
Kost-Smith, L. E., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: The incremental effects of a “smog of bias.” Physical Review Physics Education Research, 6, 1-17. doi:10.1103/physrevstper.6.020112 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lindberg, D. C. (2008). The beginnings of Western science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
*Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Shea, D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H., Halvorson, M. B. (2001). Men and women at promise for scientific excellence: Similarity not dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 12, 309-317. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00357 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Malcolm, S. M., Hall, P. Q., Brown, J. W. (1976). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science (No. 76-R-3). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Google Scholar | |
|
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264-269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
National Science Foundation . (2015a). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities: 2014 (NSF 16-300). Retrieved from National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics website: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/sed/ Google Scholar | |
|
National Science Foundation . (2015b). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2015 (NSF 15311). Retrieved from National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics website: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15311/ Google Scholar | |
|
Nobel Prize Awarded Women . (2016, March 16). Retrieved from http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/women.html Google Scholar | |
|
Noble, K. D., Subotnik, R. F., Arnold, K. D. (1996). A new model for adult female talent development: A synthesis of perspectives from remarkable women. In Arnold, K., Noble, K. D., Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.), Remarkable women (pp. 427-439). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton. Google Scholar | |
|
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., . . . Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593-10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Reis, S. (2005). Feminist perspectives on talent development: A research-based conception of giftedness in women. In Sternberg, R. J., Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 217-245). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Rosser, S. V. (1987). Feminist scholarship in the sciences: Where are we now and when can we expect a theoretical breakthrough? Hypatia, 2, 5-17. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1987.tb01338.x Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Rosser, S. V. (1995). Reaching the majority: Retaining women in the pipeline. In Rosser, S. V. (Ed.), Teaching the majority: Breaking the gender barrier in science, mathematics, and engineering (pp. 1-21). New York, NY: Teachers College. Google Scholar | |
|
*Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Malley, J., Stewart, A. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 47-58. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00261.x Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
*Smeding, A. (2012). Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): An investigation of their implicit gender stereotypes and stereotypes’ connectedness to math performance. Sex Roles, 67, 617-629. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0209-4 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
*Subotnik, R. F., Arnold, K. D. (1995). Passing through the gates: Career establishment of talented women scientists. Roeper Review, 18, 55-61. doi:10.1080/02783199509553698 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
*Subotnik, R. F., Stone, K. M., Steiner, C. (2001). Lost generation of elite talent in science. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 33-43. doi:10.4219/jsge-2001-363 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
*Talves, K. (2016). Discursive self-positioning strategies of Estonian female scientists in terms of academic career and excellence. Women’s Studies International Forum, 54, 157-166. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2015.06.007 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
*Tate, E. D., Linn, M. C. (2005). How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 483-493. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-0223-1 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237-246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
*Tirri, K., Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2002). Critical incidents in the lives of gifted female Finnish scientists. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 151-163. doi:10.4219/jsge-2002-379 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
*Webb, R. M., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2002). Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 785-794. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.785 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
