Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 1, 2012

Graduates Respond to an Innovative Educational Doctorate Program

Abstract

Dispute about professional doctoral programs in education has increased, with much hinging on the design of educational doctorate (EdD) programs. In this study, the first cohort of graduates responded to a new, innovative EdD program designed to develop them as leaders, scholars, and practitioners. Twenty graduates completed an exit survey, and a content analysis of their dissertations was performed. Both were done to improve the program. Graduates valued curricular and instructional features, engaged in actions to improve their local settings, endorsed a sense of community that developed, and reported changes in their professional identities. Their dissertation work validated these ideas.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Andrews R., Grogan M. (2005). Form should follow function: Removing the Ed.D. dissertation from the Ph.D. straight jacket. UCEA Review, 46, 10-13.
Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate. (2010). Working principles for the professional practice doctorate in education. College Park, MD: Author.
Dewey J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Erikson F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock M. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Evans R. (2007). Comments on Shulman, Golde, Bueschel, and Garabedian: Existing practice is not the template. Educational Researcher, 36, 553-559.
Gee J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. In Secada W. G. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 25, pp. 99-125.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
Greenwood D. J., Levin M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Grogan M., Donaldson J., Simmons J. (2007, May 19). Disrupting the status quo: The action research dissertation as a transformative strategy. Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/m14529/1.2/
Herr K., Anderson G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Holland D., Lachicotte W. Jr., Skinner D., Cain C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kolb D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Levine A. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project. Retrieved from www.edschools.org
Lewin K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Lewin K. (2005). The solution of a chronic conflict in industry. Proceedings of the second brief psychotherapy council. In Cooke B., Cox J. F. (Eds.), Fundamentals of action research (Vol. 1, pp. 3-17). London, England: SAGE. (Original work published 1944)
Miles M. B., Huberman A. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Murphy J., Vriesenga M. (2005). Developing professionally anchored dissertations: Lessons from innovative programs. School Leadership Review, 1, 33-57.
Nasir N. S., Hand V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76, 449-475.
Noddings N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Noddings N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Noddings N. (2003). Happiness and education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Olson K., Clark C. M. (2009). A signature pedagogy in doctoral education: The leader-scholar community. Educational Researcher, 38, 216-227.
Osguthorpe R. T., Wong M. J. (1993). The Ph.D. versus the Ed.D.: Time for a decision. Innovative Higher Education, 18, 47-63.
Shulman L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134, 52-59.
Shulman L. S. (2007). Practical wisdom in the service of professional practice. Educational Researcher, 36, 560-563.
Shulman L. S., Golde C. M., Bueschel A. C., Garabedian K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35, 25-32.
Strauss A., Corbin J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Stringer E. T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Weber R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Wenger E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger E., McDermott R., Snyder W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 1, 2012
Issue published: April 2012

Keywords

  1. doctoral programs
  2. action research
  3. communities of practice
  4. identity

Rights and permissions

© The University Council for Educational Administration 2012.
Request permissions for this article.

History

Published online: April 1, 2012
Issue published: April 2012

Authors

Affiliations

Audrey Amrein-Beardsley
Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA
Debby Zambo
Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA
David W. Moore
Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA
Ray R. Buss
Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA
Nancy J. Perry
Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA
Suzanne R. Painter
Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA
David L. Carlson
Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA
Teresa S. Foulger
Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA
Kate Olson
Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
Kathleen S. Puckett
Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA

Notes

Audrey Amrein-Beardsley, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, PO Box 37100, Phoenix, AZ 85069-7100 Email: [email protected]
Audrey Amrein-Beardsley, PhD, is an associate professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College (MLFTC) at Arizona State University (ASU). Her research interests include educational policy, research methods, and more specifically, high-stakes tests and value-added measurements and systems. She is also the creator and host of a show titled Inside the Academy during which she interviews some of the top educational researchers in the academy (http://insidetheacademy.asu.edu).
Debby Zambo, PhD, is an associate professor in the MLFTC at ASU. She is the coordinator of MLFTC’s EdD program and an executive board member on the Carnegie Project on the Educational Doctorate (CPED). Her research interests include the new vision of the EdD and the application of educational psychology and neuroscience to classrooms.
David W. Moore, PhD, is an emeritus professor of education in the MLFTC at ASU. For 30 years, his research interests centered about adolescent literacy. His interests recently shifted to the professional doctorate in education when he became coordinator of the EdD in Leadership and Innovation program at ASU.
Ray R. Buss, PhD, is an associate professor in the MLFTC at ASU. His research interests include the development of efficacy in preservice and beginning teachers, action research and its use in classroom settings, and evaluation of the new doctoral program in the college.
Nancy J. Perry, PhD, is the assistant dean of clinical services in the MLFTC at ASU. Her research interests include school readiness, particularly social-emotional development, and clinical experiences in preservice teacher preparation programs.
Suzanne R. Painter, PhD, is an associate professor and the director of the Division of Educational Leadership and Innovation in the MLFTC at ASU. Her research is in the area of leadership preparation, school law, and technology implementation.
David L. Carlson, EdD, is an assistant professor in the MLFTC at ASU. His research interests include methods of teaching English, writing assessment, and poststructuralist theories in education. He is also working on three book projects, one which focuses on graduates from the CPED consortium.
Teresa S. Foulger, EdD, is an associate professor in the MLFTC at ASU. Her research interests include educational technology, innovation, collaboration and communities of practice, social networking possibilities in K-12, and professional development. She currently serves as incoming president of the Teacher Education Special Interest Group (SIG) of the International Society of Technology in Education (ISTE).
Kate Olson, PhD, is an adjunct assistant professor and independent scholar in the Department of Education at Vassar College. She has a breadth of experience both teaching and conducting research at the K-12 and university levels in education. Her professional interests include research on teaching, teacher education, and the influence of educational policies and programs on teaching and learning for English learners.
Kathleen S. Puckett is an associate professor in MLFTC at ASU. Her research agenda includes assistive and instructional technology integration for students with disabilities and teacher training in special education. She has been an administrator of programs and grants from the U.S. Department of Education, a leader in the Council for Exceptional Children, and a teacher of elementary and middle school students.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Research on Leadership Education.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 410

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 16

  1. Building a Foundation for a Successful Doctoral Student Journey: A Sch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Educational Leadership Doctoral Program Evaluation: Student Voice as t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Why Do We Pursue Ed.D.?: A Qualitative Analysis on the Motivation of C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Developing reflective literacy leaders: a case study of action researc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. How do doctoral students interpret the idea of being part of a doctora...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. EdD students’ identity development in a Carnegie Project on the Educat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The Body of Literature on Action Research in Education
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Drawing in the School Context as a Learning Resource in School Leader ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Preparing Practitioners to Conduct Educational Research and Evaluation...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Action research in graduate teacher education: a review of the literat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Uncovering the identities of students and graduates in a CPED-influenc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Developing researching professionals in an EdD program
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Seven Years After the Call: Students’ and Graduates’ Perceptions of th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Action Research and the Educational Doctorate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Enacting a Cycle of Inquiry Capstone Research Project in Doctoral-Leve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Enacting a Cycle of Inquiry Capstone Research Project in Doctoral-Leve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

UCEA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

UCEA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text