Abstract
Women’s intrasexual competition has received significant attention only in the last decades, with even less work investigating women’s defenses against such aggression. Yet, we should expect that women can (a) grasp which perceptually-salient cues evoke same-sex aggression and (b) strategically damp the display of (some of) those cues when aggression risk is greatest, thereby avoiding the potentially high costs of victimization. Women selectively aggress against women displaying cues of sexual permissiveness (e.g., revealing dress) and/or desirability (e.g., physical attractiveness). We find that (a) women (and men) anticipate greater intrasexual aggression toward women dressed revealingly versus modestly, especially if targets are attractive. Employing behavioral and self-report measures, we also find (b) women create outfits baring less skin, select more modest clothing, and intend to dress less revealingly to encounter other women, flexibly damping permissiveness cues depending on individual features (physical attractiveness) and situational features (being a newcomer) that amplify aggression risk.
References
|
Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females’ indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19, 290–303. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Arnocky, S., Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Sexual competition among women: A review of the theory and supporting evidence. In Fisher, M. L. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Baumeister, R. F., Reynolds, T., Winegard, B., Vohs, K. D. (2017). Competing for love: Applying sexual economics theory to mating contests. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 230–241. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339–363. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Benenson, J. F., Abadzi, H. (2019). Contest versus scramble competition: Sex differences in the quest for status. Current Opinion in Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.013 Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Hultgren, B., Nguyen, T., Bullock, G., Wrangham, R. (2013). Social exclusion: more important to human females than males. PLoS One, 8, e55851. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Blake, K. R., Bastian, B., Denson, T. F. (2018). Heightened male aggression toward sexualized women following romantic rejection: The mediating role of sex goal activation. Aggressive Behavior, 44, 40–49. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Blake, K. R., Fourati, M., Brooks, R. C. (2018). Who suppresses female sexuality? An examination of support for Islamic veiling in a secular Muslim democracy as a function of sex and offspring sex. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 632–638. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bleske, A. L., Shackelford, T. K. (2001). Poaching, promiscuity, and deceit: Combatting mating rivalry in same-sex friendships. Personal Relationships, 8, 407–424. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Buss, D. M., Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Buunk, A. P., Zurriaga, R., González-Navarro, P., Monzani, L. (2016). Attractive rivals may undermine the expectation of career advancement and enhance jealousy. An experimental study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25, 790–803. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Campbell, A. (1995). A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 99–123. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Campbell, A. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., Li, N. P. (2011). Ovulation, female competition, and product choice: Hormonal influences on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 921–934. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Elliot, A. J., Greitemeyer, T., Pazda, A. D. (2013). Women’s use of red clothing as a sexual signal in intersexual interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 599–602. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Feshbach, N. D. (1969). Sex differences in children’s modes of aggressive responses toward outsiders. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 15, 249–258. Google Scholar | |
|
Feshbach, N., Sones, G. (1971). Sex differences in adolescent reactions toward newcomers. Developmental Psychology, 4, 381. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138–141. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389–395. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Goetz, C. D., Easton, J. A., Buss, D. M. (2014). Women’s perceptions of sexual exploitability cues and their link to sexual attractiveness. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 999–1008. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Gurung, R. A., Chrouser, C. J. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter? Sex Roles, 57, 91–99. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Haselton, M. G., Mortezaie, M., Pillsworth, E. G., Bleske-Rechek, A., Frederick, D. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 40–45. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Hess, N. H., Hagen, E. H. (2006). Sex differences in indirect aggression: Psychological evidence from young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 231–245. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hess, N. H., Hagen, E. H. (2017). Gossip, reputation, and friendship in in-group competition: An evolutionary perspective. In Giardini, F., Wittek, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gossip and reputation. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Howlett, N., Pine, K. J., Cahill, N., Orakçıoğlu, İ., Fletcher, B. C. (2015). Unbuttoned: The interaction between provocativeness of female work attire and occupational status. Sex Roles, 72, 105–116. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hudders, L., De Backer, C., Fisher, M., Vyncke, P. (2014). The rival wears Prada: Luxury consumption as a female competition strategy. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, doi:10.1177/147470491401200306 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Hurst, A. C., Alquist, J. L., Puts, D. A. (2017). Women’s fertility status alters other women’s jealousy and mate guarding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 191–203. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Krems, J. A., Neel, R., Neuberg, S. L., Puts, D. A., Kenrick, D. T. (2016). Women selectively guard their (desirable) mates from ovulating women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 551–572. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Krems, J. A., Neuberg, S. L., Filip-Crawford, G., Kenrick, D. T. (2015). Is she angry? (Sexually desirable) women “see” anger on female faces. Psychological Science, 26, 1655–1663. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Leenaars, L. S., Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A. (2008). Evolutionary perspective on indirect victimization in adolescence: The role of attractiveness, dating and sexual behavior. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 34, 404–415. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Maner, J. K., McNulty, J. K. (2013). Attunement to the fertility status of same-sex rivals: Women’s testosterone responses to olfactory ovulation cues. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 412–418. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Muggleton, N. K., Tarran, S. R., Fincher, C. L. (2018). Who punishes promiscuous women? Both women and women, but only women inflict costly punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40, 259–268. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pazda, A. D., Elliot, A. J., Greitemeyer, T. (2012). Sexy red: Perceived sexual receptivity mediates the red-attraction relation in men viewing woman. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 787–790. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Pazda, A. D., Prokop, P., Elliot, A. J. (2014). Red and romantic rivalry: Viewing another woman in red increases perceptions of sexual receptivity, derogation, and intentions to mate-guard. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1260–1269. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Reynolds, T., Baumeister, R. F., Maner, J. K. (2018). Competitive reputation manipulation: Women strategically transmit social information about romantic rivals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 195–209. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Saad, G. (2013). Evolutionary consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 351–371. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sacco, D. F., Bermond, A., Young, S. G. (2016). Evidence for the lipstick effect at the level of automatic visual attention. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 10, 213. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sakaguchi, K., Hasegawa, T. (2006). Person perception through gait information and target choice for sexual advances: Comparison of likely targets in experiments and real life. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 63–85. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368, 20130080. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Vaillancourt, T., Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: Intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 569–577. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Vrangalova, Z., Bukberg, R. E., Rieger, G. (2014). Birds of a feather? Not when it comes to sexual permissiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 93–113. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |


