Does the Game Really Change? How Students Consume Mediated Sports in the Age of Social Media

First Published August 4, 2015 Research Article

Authors

1
 
Department of Journalism & Media Management, School of Communication, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
by this author
First Published Online: August 4, 2015

Social media have been said to rival traditional media in the realm of sports. Actual evidence for a change in consumption patterns, though, remains scarce. This study investigates college students’ use of multiple distribution systems in the context of sports. More specifically, the relative importance of Twitter in relation to television is assessed. In addition, variables potentially predicting a greater reliance on Twitter are analyzed. Results indicate that television remains the primary distribution system for sports and that the importance of Twitter might have been overstated. The use of social media does not diminish the consumption of traditional sports broadcasts but is positively correlated. Finally, results of a regression analysis find that a subset of individuals is more likely to rely on Twitter depending on their tendency to engage in parasocial interactions, their Twitter use patterns, and their perceived expertise in sports.

Abelman, R. (1996). Can we generalize from generation X? Not! Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 441446. doi:10.1080/08838159609364365
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Auter, P. J., Palmgreen, P. (2000). Development and validation of a parasocial interaction measure: The audience-persona interaction scale. Communication Research Reports, 17, 7989. doi:10.1080/08824090009388753
Google Scholar | Crossref
Basil, M. D., Brown, W. J., Bocarnea, M. C. (2002). Differences in univariate values versus multivariate relationships. Human Communication Research, 28, 501514. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00820.x
Google Scholar | ISI
Billings, A. (2014). Power in the reverberation: Why Twitter matters, but not the way most believe. Communication & Sport, 2, 107112. doi:10.1177/2167479514527427
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Boyd, D. M., Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Boyle, R. (2014). Television sport in the age of screens and content. Television & New Media, 15, 746751. doi:10.1177/1527476414529167
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Cameron, J., Geidner, N. (2014). Something old, something new, something borrowed from something blue: Experiments on dual viewing TV and Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 400419. doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.935852
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 755762. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Clavio, G., Kian, T. M. (2010). Uses and gratifications of a retired female athlete’s Twitter followers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 485500.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Clavio, G., Walsh, P. (2014). Dimensions of social media utilization among college sport fans. Communication & Sport, 2, 261281. doi:10.1177/2167479513480355
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Cunningham, W. H., Anderson, W. T., Murphy, J. H. (1974). Are students real people? The Journal of Business, 47, 399409. doi:10.2307/2352457
Google Scholar | Crossref
Elmer, G. (2013). Live research: Twittering an election debate. New Media & Society, 15, 1830. doi:10.1177/1461444812457328
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Filo, K., Lock, D., Karg, A. (2015). Sport and social media research: A review. Sport Management Review, 18, 166181. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.11.001
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Frederick, E. L., Lim, C. H., Clavio, G., Pedersen, P. M., Burch, L. M. (2014). Choosing between the one-way or two-way street: An exploration of relationship promotion by professional athletes on Twitter. Communication & Sport, 2, 8099. doi:10.1177/2167479512466387
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Frederick, E. L., Lim, C. H., Clavio, G., Walsh, P. (2012). Why we follow: An examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 481502.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Galily, Y. (2014). When the medium becomes “well done”: Sport, television, and technology in the twenty-first Century. Television & New Media, 15, 717724. doi:10.1177/1527476414532141
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gantz, W. (1981). An exploration of viewing motives and behaviors associated with television sports. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 25, 263275. doi:10.1080/08838158109386450
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gantz, W., Lewis, N. (2014). Sports on traditional and newer digital media: Is there really a fight for fans? Television & New Media, 15, 760768. doi:10.1177/1527476414529463
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gantz, W., Wenner, L. A. (1995). Fanship and the television sports viewing experience. Sociology of Sport Journal, 12, 5674.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gibbs, C., O’ Reilly, N., Brunette, M. (2014). Professional team sport and Twitter: Gratifications sought and obtained by followers. International Journal of Sport Communication, 7, 188213. doi:10.1123/IJSC.2014-0005
Google Scholar | Crossref
Giglietto, F., Selva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64, 260277. doi:10.1111/jcom.12085
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4, 279305. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Graver, F. (2012, 10). 90 days at Twitter: What I learned from the inside. Paper presented at the Ad Age Social Engagement/Social TV Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
Google Scholar
Greer, C. F., Ferguson, D. A. (2011). Following local television news personalities on Twitter: A uses and gratifications approach to social networking. Electronic News, 5, 145157. doi:10.1177/1931243111420405
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Harrington, S. (2013). Tweeting about the telly: Live TV, audiences, and social media. In Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., Puschmann, C. (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 237247). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Google Scholar
Harrington, S., Highfield, T., Bruns, A. (2013). More than a backchannel: Twitter and television. Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 10, 405409.
Google Scholar
Hartmann, T. (2008). Parasocial interactions and paracommunication with new media characters. In Konijn, E. A., Utz, S., Tanis, M., Barnes, S. B. (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 177199). New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Hartmann, T., Stuke, D., Daschmann, G. (2008). Positive parasocial relationships with drivers affect suspense in racing sport spectators. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20, 2434. doi:10.1027/1864-1105.20.1.24
Google Scholar | Crossref
Herrera-Damas, S., Hermida, A. (2014). Tweeting but not talking: The missing element in talk radio’s institutional use of Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 481500. doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.966361
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Highfield, T., Harrington, S., Bruns, A. (2013). Twitter as a technology for audiencing and fandom. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 315339. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.756053
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hoerner, J. (1999). Scaling the web: A parasocial interaction scale for world wide web sites. In Schumann, D. W., Thorson, E. (Eds.), Advertising and the world wide web (pp. 135147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Horton, D., Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215229.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Hull, K., Lewis, N. P. (2014). Why Twitter displaces broadcast sports media: A model. International Journal of Sport Communication, 7, 1633. doi:10.1123/IJSC.2013-0093
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hutchins, B. (2011). The acceleration of media sport culture: Twitter, telepresence and online messaging. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 237257. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2010.508534
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kassing, J. W., Sanderson, J. (2009). You’re the kind of guy that we all want for a drinking buddy: Expressions of parasocial interaction on Floydlandis.com. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 182203. doi:10.1080/10570310902856063
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kassing, J. W., Sanderson, J. (2010). Fan-athlete interaction and Twitter tweeting through the Giro: A case study. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 113128.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kassing, J. W., Sanderson, J. (2015). Playing in the new media game or riding the virtual bench: Confirming and disconfirming membership in the community of sport. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 39, 318. doi:10.1177/0193723512458931
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509523. doi:10.2307/2747854
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on the World Wide Web, 591600. doi:10.1177/0193723512458931
Google Scholar | Crossref
Larsson, A. O. (2013). Tweeting the viewer—use of Twitter in a talk show context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 135152. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.787081
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lebel, K., Danylchuk, K. (2012). How tweet it is: A gendered analysis of professional tennis players’ self-presentation on Twitter. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5, 461480.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Levy, M. R. (1979). Watching TV news as para-social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 23, 6980. doi:10.1080/08838157909363919
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Marwick, A., Boyd, D. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17, 139158. doi:10.1177/1354856510394539
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Matsa, K. E., Mitchell, A. (2014). 8 key takeaways about social media and the news (PewResearch Center). Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2014/03/26/8-key-takeaways-about-social-media-and-news/
Google Scholar
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Matsa, K. E. (2015). Millennials and political news: Social media—the local TV for the next generation? (PewResearch Center). Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2015/06/01/millennials-political-news/
Google Scholar
Mitchell, A., Holcomb, J., Page, D. (2013). News use across social media platforms (Pew Journalism Project). Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2013/11/14/news-use-across-social-media-platforms/
Google Scholar
Mitchell, A., Kiley, J., Gottfried, J., Guskin, E. (2013). The role of news on Facebook: Common yet incidental (PewResearch Center). Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2013/10/24/the-role-of-news-on-facebook/
Google Scholar
Mukherjee, P., Jansen, B. J. (2014). Social TV and the social soundtrack: Significance of second screen interaction during television viewing. In Kennedy, W. G., Agarwal, N., Yang, S. J. (Eds.), Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction (Vol. 8393, pp. 317324). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Nielsen . (2013). The cross-platform report: A look across screens. Nielsen Wire. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2013/the-cross-platform-report--a-look-across-screens.html
Google Scholar
Nordlund, J.-E. (1978). Media interaction. Communication Research, 5, 150175. doi:10.1177/009365027800500202
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Pallotta, F. (2015, 2 2). Super bowl XLIX posts the largest audience in TV history. CNNMoney. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com
Google Scholar
Pegoraro, A. (2010). Look who’s talking—Athletes on Twitter: A case study. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 501514.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Petrovic, S., Osborne, M., Mccreadie, R., Macdonald, C., Ounis, I., Shrimpton, L. (2013). Can Twitter replace Newswire for breaking news? Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM), 713716.
Google Scholar
Raney, A. A. (2006). Why we watch and enjoy mediated sports. In Raney, A. A., Bryant, J. (Eds.), Handbook of sports and media (pp. 313329). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Reed, S. (2013). American sports writers’ social media use and its influence on professionalism. Journalism Practice, 7, 555571. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.739325
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rogers, S. (2014, 7 14). Insights into the #WorldCup conversation on Twitter [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/2014/insights-into-the-worldcup-conversation-on-twitter
Google Scholar
Rosengren, K. E., Windahl, S. (1972). Mass media consumption as a functional alternative. In McQuail, D. (Ed.), Sociology of mass communications: Selected readings (pp. 119134). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
Google Scholar
Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155180. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rubin, A. M., Step, M. M. (2000). Impact of motivation, attraction, and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 635654. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4404_7
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rubin, R. B., Mc Hugh, M. P. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction relationships. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31, 279292. doi:10.1080/08838158709386664
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sanderson, J. (2011). It’s a whole new ballgame: How social media is changing sports. New York, NY: Hampton Press.
Google Scholar
Sanderson, J., Browning, B. (2013). Training versus monitoring: A qualitative examination of athletic department practices regarding student-athletes and Twitter. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 14, 105111. doi:10.1080/17459435.2013.835348
Google Scholar | Crossref
Schultz, B., Sheffer, M. L. (2010). An exploratory study of how Twitter is affecting sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 226239.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sheffer, M. L., Schultz, B. (2010). Paradigm shift or passing fad? Twitter and sports journalism. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3, 472484.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Spinda, J. S., Earnheardt, A. C., Hugenberg, L. W. (2009). Checkered flags and mediated friendships: Parasocial interaction among NASCAR fans. Journal of Sports Media, 4, 3155. doi:10.1353/jsm.0.0041
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sun, T. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of parasocial interaction with sport athletes and identification with sport teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33, 194217.
Google Scholar
Sun, T., Wu, G. (2012). Influence of personality traits on parasocial relationship with sports celebrities: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11, 136146. doi:10.1002/cb.1378
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Thorson, K. S., Rodgers, S. (2006). Relationships between blogs as eWOM and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6, 544. doi:10.1080/15252019.2006.10722117
Google Scholar | Crossref
Trail, G. T., James, J. D. (2001). The motivation scale for sport consumption: Assessment of the scale’s psychometric properties. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24, 108127.
Google Scholar
Tribbey, C. (2014). CEA, NATPE Study Offers Second Screen Viewing Insights [Web log post]. 2ndScreenSociety.com. Retrieved from http://www.2ndscreensociety.com/blog/2014/01/14/cea-natpe-study-offers-second-screen-viewing-insights/
Google Scholar
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875901. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wenner, L. A. (2014a). Much ado (or not) about Twitter? Assessing an emergent communication and sport research agenda. Communication & Sport, 2, 103106. doi:10.1177/2167479514527426
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wenner, L. A. (2014b). On the limits of the new and the lasting power of the mediasport interpellation. Television & New Media, 15, 732740. doi:10.1177/1527476414532957
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Whannel, G. (2014). The paradoxical character of live television sport in the twenty-first century. Television & New Media, 15, 769776. doi:10.1177/1527476414551180
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Witkemper, C., Blaszka, M., Chung, J. (2014). Establishing a typology of social media uses in the sport industry: A multidimensional scaling study. Communication & Sport. doi:10.1177/2167479514544951
Google Scholar | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Access

    does not have access to this content.

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

COM-article-ppv for GBP29.00
COM-article-ppv for $37.50

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top