![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Despite the importance of prior knowledge to learning, few studies have systematically addressed the extent to which or ways in which instructional resources support teachers in the activation of students' prior knowledge, or the extent to which teachers prompt students' prior knowledge activation in practice. In study one, a content analysis was applied to the language in four instructional resources to come to an understanding of the ways in which resources guide teachers to activate students' prior knowledge. In study two, we went beyond teacher resources to examine prior knowledge activation in four (two male, two female) public elementary teachers' reading classrooms. A two-step procedure was followed to analyze teachers' utterances, first discriminating language intended to activate students' prior knowledge (n = 27) from other utterances (n = 1,770), and then examining the 27 knowledge activation utterances and scoring them according to the frame of reference. The results suggest that instances of prior knowledge activation were rare during reading lessons, both with recommended statements and demonstrated actions. Additionally, the analysis found that instructional resources focused predominantly on world knowledge and personal experience, whereas the practitioners focused on knowledge from previously taught lessons.
Keywords Prior knowledge activation
References
Section:
|
Alexander, P. A. (2005). The path to competence: A lifespan developmental perspective on reading. White Paper. Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference. Google Scholar | |
|
Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., Schulze, S. K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 313–337. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Alvarez, M. C., Risko, V. J. (1989). Using a thematic organizer to facilitate transfer learning with college developmental studies students. Reading Research and Instruction, 28, 1–15. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Alvermann, D. E., Hague, S. A. (1989). Comprehension of counterintuitive science text: Effects of prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 197–202. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Alvermann, D. E., Hynd, C. (1989). Effects of prior knowledge activation modes and text structure on nonscience majors’ comprehension of physics. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 97–102. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Alvermann, D. E., Smith, L. C., Readence, J. E. (1985). Prior knowledge and the comprehension of compatible and incompatible text. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 420–436. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Anderson, R. C., Pearson, P. D. (2002). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., Barr, R. (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 255–291). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar | |
|
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367–381. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Google Scholar | |
|
Baldwin, R. S., Peleg-Bruckner, Z., McClintock, A. H. (1985). Effects of topic interest and prior knowledge on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 497–504. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Biemans, H. J. A., Deel, O. R., Simons, P. R. (2001). Differences between successful and less successful students while working with the CONTACT-2 strategy. Learning and Instruction, 11, 265–281. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Braasch, J. L. G., Goldman, S. R. (2010). The role of prior knowledge in learning from analogies in science texts. Discourse Processes, 47, 447–479. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bransford, J. D., Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Brown, S., Kappes, L. (2012). Implementing the common core state standards: A primer on “close reading of text.” Aspen Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.aspeninstitute.org/ Google Scholar | |
|
Bursuck, B., Blanks, B. (2010). Evidence-based early reading practices within a response to intervention system. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 421–431. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Carr, S. C., Thompson, B. (1996). The effects of prior knowledge and schema activation strategies on the inferential reading comprehension of children with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 48–61. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Coleman, D., Pimentel, S. (2012). Revised publishers’ criteria for the Common Core State Standards in English language arts and literacy, grades 3-12. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/assets/Publishers_Criteria_for_3-12.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Common Core State Standards Initiative . (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers and National Governors Association. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ Google Scholar | |
|
Dewitz, P., Jones, J. (2012). Using basal readers: From dutiful fidelity to intelligent decision making. The Reading Teacher, 66, 391–400. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dewitz, P., Jones, J., Leahy, S. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 102–126. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dochy, F. J., Alexander, P. A. (1995). Mapping prior knowledge: A framework for discussion among researchers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 225–242. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Education Market Research . (2010). Elementary reading market: Teaching methods, textbooks/materials used and needed, and market size. Rockway Park, NY: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Fawson, P. C., Reutzel, R. (2000). But I only have a basal: Implementing guided reading in the early grades. The Reading Teacher, 54, 84–97. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Förster, J., Liberman, N. (2007). Knowledge activation. In Kruglanski, A. W., Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 201–231). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Ford, C. E., Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, into national, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., Thompson, S. A. (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–185). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Gurlitt, J., Renkl, A. (2008). Are high-coherent concept maps better for prior knowledge activation? Differential effects of concept mapping tasks on high school vs. university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 407–419. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Houghton Mifflin . (2005). Expeditions. Boston, MA: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt . (2012). Journeys. Orlando, FL: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Kant, I. (1963). Critique of pure reason (Kemp Smith, N. , Trans.). London, England: Macmillan. (Original work published 1787) Google Scholar | |
|
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge. Google Scholar | |
|
Lipson, M. Y. (1982). Learning new information from text: The role of prior knowledge and reading ability. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 243–261. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Machiels-Bongaerts, M., Schmidt, H. G., Boshuizen, H. P. A. (1995). The effect of prior knowledge activation on text recall: An investigation of two conflicting hypotheses. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 409–423. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mannies, N. J., Gridley, B. E., Krug, D., Glover, J. A. (1989). Knowledge mobilization: Schema activation or generation effect? The Journal of General Psychology, 116, 121–132. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Macmillan/McGraw-Hill . (2011). Treasures. New York, NY: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Moore, D. W., Bean, T. W., Birdyshaw, D., Rycik, J. A. (1999). Adolescent literacy: A position statement. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 97–112. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
National Assessment Governing Board . (2010). Reading framework for the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Retrieved from http://www.nagb.org/content/nagb/assets/documents/publications/frameworks/reading-2011-framework.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Nichols, W. D., Zellner, L. J., Rupley, W. H., Willson, V. L., Kim, Y., Mergen, S., Young, C. (2005). What affects instructional choice? Profiles of K-2 teachers’ use of reading instructional strategies and methods. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 437–458. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers . (2011). PARCC model content frameworks: English language arts/literacy grades 3-11. Retrieved from www.parcconline.org/sites/parcc/files/PARCCMCFELALiteracyAugust2012_FINAL.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Pearson, P. D., Hansen, J., Gordon, C. (1979). The effect of background knowledge on young children’s comprehension of explicit and implicit information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11, 201–209. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Scott, Foresman P. (2013). Reading street: Common core. Glenview, IL: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Peeck, J., van den Bosch, A. B., Kreupeling, W. J. (1982). Effect of mobilizing prior knowledge on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 771–777. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Pichert, J. W., Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309–315. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Pressley, M., Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1391–1466. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
van den Broek, P., Mouw, J., Kraal, A. (in press). Individual differences in reading comprehension. In Afflerbach, P. (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading: Reader, text, and context. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Wetzels, S. A., Kester, L., van Merriënboer, J. J. (2011). Adapting prior knowledge activation: Mobilisation, perspective taking, and learners’ prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 16–21. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
