Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online September 22, 2021

Working Through Marriage: Effects of Marital Inequalities on Perceptions of Women’s Employment

Abstract

Women’s domestic responsibilities are often cited as the main barrier to their entry into the workforce. Drawing on a survey conducted across four cities in North India, we look within the household to evaluate the effects of marital inequalities on the perceptions held about women’s work. Respondents were asked questions about the personal value in working, women’s competence to excel in certain fields and the opportunity costs of working outside the house. We characterise marital inequality through differences in age and education between spouses and marriage type as well as through the distribution of power in household decision-making and the freedom of mobility outside the house enjoyed by women. Overall, we note that these markers tend to have the strongest effects on questions that explicitly note discord between work options and domestic responsibilities. The variation in these effects reveal the relative valence of certain powers within the house over others.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Allendorf K., & Pandian R. K. (2016). The decline of arranged marriage? Marital change and continuity in India. Population and Development Review, 42(3), 435–464. www.jstor.org/stable/44015659.
Chakrabarti A., & Chaudhuri K. (2018). Does employment before marriage exert autonomy after marriage? Evidence on female autonomy from India. Oxford Development Studies, 46(2), 199–214.
Deshpande A., & Kabeer N. (2019). (In)Visibility, care and cultural barriers: The size and shape of women’s work in India. Discussion Paper Series in Economics, Ashoka University.
Dommaraju P. (2016). Divorce and separation in India. Population and Development Review, 42(2), 195–223. www.jstor.org/stable/44015635.
Hegewisch A., & Gornick J. C. (2011). The impact of work-family policies on women’s employment: A review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 119–138.
Jejeebhoy S. J., & Halli S. S. (2005). Marriage Patterns in Rural India: Influence of Sociocultural Context. In Lloyd C. B., Behrman J. R., Stromquist N. P., & Cohen B. (Eds.), The changing transitions to adulthood in developing countries: Selected studies (p. 172–199). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.
Khan S. (2017). What women want: Gender gaps in political preferences. CP: Newsletter of the Comparative Politics Organized Section of the American Political Science Association, 27(1), (42–49).
Mukhopadhyay M. (2012). Matchmakers and intermediation: Marriage in contemporary Kolkata. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(43), 90–99.
Rao V. N., & Rao V. V. P. (1990). Desired qualities in a future mate in India. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 20(2), 181–198. www.jstor.org/stable/23028505.
Reyes-Hockings A. (1966). The newspaper as surrogate marriage broker in India. Sociological Bulletin 15(1), 25–39.
Sudarshan R. M., & Bhattacharya S. (2009). Through the magnifying glass: Women’s work and labour force participation in urban Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(48).

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: September 22, 2021
Issue published: September 2021

Keywords

  1. Women
  2. gender
  3. labour force participation
  4. marital inequality

Rights and permissions

© 2021 Indian Institute for Human Settlements.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shubhangi Karia
Tanvi Mehta
Center for the Advanced Study in India, New Delhi, India.

Notes

Shubhangi Karia, Centre for the Advanced Study of India and Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi 110021, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Urbanisation.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 330

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text