	New content
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

Restricted access

Other

First published July 2005

Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

Ray Pawson, Ph.D, Trisha Greenhalgh, M.D, Gill Harvey, Ph.D, and Kieran Walshe, Ph.DView all authors and affiliations

https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308530

Abstract

Evidence-based policy is a dominant theme in contemporary public services but the practical realities and challenges involved in using evidence in policy-making are formidable. Part of the problem is one of complexity. In health services and other public services, we are dealing with complex social interventions which act on complex social systems-things like league tables, performance measures, regulation and inspection, or funding reforms. These are not ‘magic bullets‘ which will always hit their target, but programmes whose effects are crucially dependent on context and implementation. Traditional methods of review focus on measuring and reporting on programme effectiveness, often find that the evidence is mixed or conflicting, and provide little or no clue as to why the intervention worked or did not work when applied in different contexts or circumstances, deployed by different stakeholders, or used for different purposes.

This paper offers a model of research synthesis which is designed to work with complex social interventions or programmes, and which is based on the emerging ‘realist’ approach to evaluation. It provides an explanatory analysis aimed at discerning what works for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects and how. The first step is to make explicit the programme theory (or theories) - the underlying assumptions about how an intervention is meant to work and what impacts it is expected to have. We then look for empirical evidence to populate this theoretical framework, supporting, contradicting or modifying the programme theories as it goes. The results of the review combine theoretical understanding and empirical evidence, and focus on explaining the relationship between the context in which the intervention is applied, the mechanisms by which it works and the outcomes which are produced. The aim is to enable decision-makers to reach a deeper understanding of the intervention and how it can be made to work most effectively.

Realist review does not provide simple answers to complex questions. It will not tell policy-makers or managers whether something works or not, but will provide the policy and practice community with the kind of rich, detailed and highly practical understanding of complex social interventions which is likely to be of much more use to them when planning and implementing programmes at a national, regional or local level.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

1. Bhaskar R. A Realist Theory of Science 2nd edn. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1978

Sign in

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References

Cite article

Cite article

Download to reference manager

Share

Share this article

Share with email

Share on social media

Share access to this article

Information

Published In

Rights and permissions

History

Authors

Affiliations

Notes

Metrics

Journals metrics

Article usage*

Articles citing this one

Figures & Media

Tables

Get access

Access options

Sign in

View options

PDF/ePub

Also from SAGE Publishing

Article usage^*