Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 1, 2011

Delivery of Internet-based cancer genetic counselling services to patients' homes: a feasibility study

Abstract

We examined the feasibility of home videoconferencing for providing cancer genetic education and risk information to people at risk. Adults with possible hereditary colon or breast and ovarian cancer syndromes were offered Internet-based counselling. Participants were sent web cameras and software to install on their home PCs. They watched a prerecorded educational video and then took part in a live counselling session with a genetic counsellor. A total of 31 participants took part in Internet counselling sessions. Satisfaction with counselling was high in all domains studied, including technical (mean 4.3 on a 1–5 scale), education (mean 4.7), communication (mean 4.8), psychosocial (mean 4.1) and overall (mean 4.2). Qualitative data identified technical aspects that could be improved. All participants reported that they would recommend Internet-based counselling to others. Internet-based genetic counselling is feasible and associated with a high level of satisfaction among participants.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Eng C, Hampel H, de la Chapelle A. Genetic testing for cancer predisposition. Annu Rev Med 2001;52:371–400
2. Collins FS. Shattuck lecture – medical and societal consequences of the Human Genome Project. N Engl J Med 1999;341:28–37
3. Myers MF, Chang MH, Jorgensen C, et al. Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer: evaluating the impact of a direct-to-consumer marketing campaign on physicians' knowledge and practices. Genet Med 2006;8:361–70
4. Lowery JT, Byers T, Axell L, Ku L, Jacobellis J. The impact of direct-to-consumer marketing of cancer genetic testing on women according to their genetic risk. Genet Med 2008;10:888–94
5. Wideroff L, Vadaparampil ST, Greene MH, Taplin S, Olson L, Freedman AN. Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians. J Med Genet 2005;42:749–55
6. Gray RE, James P, Manthorne J, Gould J, Fitch MI. A consultation with Canadian rural women with breast cancer. Health Exp 2004;7:40–50
7. Coelho JJ, Arnold A, Nayler J, Tischkowitz M, MacKay J. An assessment of the efficacy of cancer genetic counselling using real-time videoconferencing technology (telemedicine) compared to face-to-face consultations. Eur J Cancer 2005;41:2257–61
8. Mitchell JA, Demiris G. Telegenetics: the next phase in the provision of genetics services? Genet Med 2005;7:1–2
9. Lea DH, Johnson JL, Ellingwood S, Allan W, Patel A, Smith R. Telegenetics in Maine: successful clinical and educational service delivery model developed from a 3-year pilot project. Genet Med 2005;7:21–7
10. Gattas MR, MacMillan JC, Meinecke I, Loane M, Wootton R. Telemedicine and clinical genetics: establishing a successful service. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7 (Suppl. 2):68–70
11. Calzone KA, Prindiville SA, Jourkiv O, et al. Randomized comparison of group versus individual genetic education and counseling for familial breast and/or ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3455–64
12. Gray J, Brain K, Iredale R, Alderman J, France E, Hughes H. A pilot study of telegenetics. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6:245–7
13. Mackay J, Taylor A. Moving genetics into clinical cancer care: examples from BRCA gene testing and telemedicine. Breast 2006;15 (Suppl. 2):S65–70
14. Abrams DJ, Geier MR. A comparison of patient satisfaction with telehealth and on-site consultations: a pilot study for prenatal genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 2006;15:199–205
15. Hall MJ, Olopade OI. Disparities in genetic testing: thinking outside the box. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2197–203
16. Horrigan J. Home broadband 2008. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org (last checked 5 August 2010)
17. Horrigan J, Murray K. Home broadband adoption in rural america. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org (last checked 5 August 2010)

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the SAGE Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011

Rights and permissions

© 2011 Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited.
Request permissions for this article.

History

Manuscript accepted: August 5, 2010
Published online: January 1, 2011
Issue published: January 2011
PubMed: 21097566

Authors

Affiliations

Neal J Meropol
University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Mary B Daly
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
Hetal S Vig
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
Frank J Manion
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
Sharon L Manne
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
Carla Mazar
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
Camara Murphy
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
Nicholas Solarino
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
Vadim Zubarev
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA

Notes

Correspondence: Dr Neal J Meropol, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 1200, Cleveland, OH 44106-5065, USA (Fax:+1 216 844 5234; Email:[email protected])

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 165

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 36 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 36

  1. Comparing cancer genetic counselling using telegenetics with in-person...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Factors Influencing Patient Preferences for Telehealth Cancer Genetic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. “There’s a huge benefit just to know that someone cares:” a qualitativ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Telehealth for genetic counseling: A systematic evidence review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Patients’ and professionals’ perspective of non-in-person visits in he...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Benefits and limitations of telegenetics: A literature review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Sudden shift to remote genetic counseling during the COVID‐19 pandemic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. The role of the genetic testing industry in patient education of hered...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Barriers and Facilitators to Genetic Service Delivery Models: Scoping ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Adapting Genetic Counseling Practice to Different Models of Service De...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Modes of Delivering Psychotherapy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Telegenetics and other care models
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with telehea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Factors influencing use of telegenetic counseling: perceptions of heal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Genetic Counseling and Testing in a Community Setting: Quality, Access...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Perspectives on Genetic Testing and Return of Results from the First C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Next-Generation Service Delivery: A Scoping Review of Patient Outcomes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Early Outcome Data Assessing Utility of a Post-Test Genomic Counseling...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Genetic Counselors’ Experiences and Interest in Telegenetics and Remot...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Comparing Outcomes of Genetic Counseling Options in Breast and Ovarian...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Benefits and Challenges of Telemedicine: the JScreen Program Experienc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Analysis of Advantages, Limitations, and Barriers of Genetic Counselin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Online genetic counseling from the providers’ perspective: counselors’...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Telegenetics use in presymptomatic genetic counselling: patient evalua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Utilizing Remote Real-Time Videoconferencing to Expand Access to Cance...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Evolving Roles for Physicians and Genetic Counselors in Managing Compl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Improving Referral for Genetic Risk Assessment in Ovarian Cancer Using...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Public Trust in Genomic Risk Assessment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Acceptability of Telemedicine and Other Cancer Genetic Counseling Mode...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Communication and technology in genetic counseling for familial cancer
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Report from the National Society of Genetic Counselors Service Deliver...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. The evolution of personalized cancer genetic counseling in the era of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Telegenetics: a systematic review of telemedicine in genetics services
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. E-genetics: exploring the acceptability and feasibility of using techn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial bre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text