![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
In response to Davies and Robinson's article looking at how queer families are positioned and position themselves in relation to neoliberalism, this article brings the child to the centre of the debate to examine how reading the child subject in terms of discourses of innocence and protection might work to maintain the hegemony of the normative — that is, heterosexual, nuclear — family, and close down discussions of alternative family structures. In exploring how the child subject is positioned in relation to these ideas, the article draws on Judith Butler's reworking of Adorno's notion of ‘ethical violence’ to suggest that the constraining of possibilities for the constitution of children's subjectivities by limiting their access to ‘difficult knowledges' around sexuality can be read as a kind of violence to the child subject. Turning to the children's voices that emerge from Davies and Robinson's research, it argues that children's failure to enact the position of the innocent child can be seen as a productive or generative space from which to begin to question the terms of this specious positioning. Thus, the article suggests that both the acknowledgement of borderwork as ethically violent towards the child, and the failure of the child to conform to the discourse of innocence together work to destabilise the normative positioning of the heterosexual, nuclear family.
References
| Aitken, S.C. (2001) Geographies of Young People: The morally contested spaces of identity, vol. 14. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Baird, B. (2008) Child Politics, Feminist Analyses, Australian Feminist Studies, 23(57), 291–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08164640802263440 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Britt, C. (2013) Loss, Failure, and an Awful Reputation: A response to Jonathan Silin, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 14(1), 32–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2013.14.1.32 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Burman, E. (2008) Developments: Child, image, nation. Hove: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Butler, J. (2005) Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823225033.001.0001 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Castañeda, C. (2002) Figurations: Child, bodies, worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Davies, B. (1993) Beyond Dualism and Towards Multiple Subjectivities, in Christian-Smith, L.K. (Ed.) Texts of Desire: Essays on fiction, femininity and schooling. London: Falmer Press. Google Scholar | |
| Davies, C. & Robinson, K.H. (2010) Hatching Babies and Stalk Deliveries: Risk and regulation in the construction of children's sexual knowledge, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(3), 249–262. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.3.249 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Davies, C. & Robinson, K.H. (2013) Reconceptualising Family: Negotiating sexuality in a governmental climate of neoliberalism, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 14(1), 39–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2013.14.1.39 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Faulkner, J. (2011) The Importance of Being Innocent: Why we worry about children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Holland, P. (2004) Picturing Childhood: The myth of the child in popular imagery. New York: I.B. Tauris. Google Scholar | |
| Hopkins, L. (2011) ‘What Will Sophie Mol Think?’: Thinking critically about the figure of the white child in Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things, Global Studies of Childhood, 4(1), 280–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.4.280 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Hopkins, L. (2012) ‘The Bad Man's Going to Jail’: The ethics and politics of childhood in The Slap, in Marks, P. (Ed.) Literature and Politics: Pushing the world in certain directions. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Google Scholar | |
| Jenkins, H. (1998) Introduction: Childhood innocence and other modern myths, in Jenkins, H. (Ed.) The Children's Culture Reader. New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Lumby, C. & Funnell, N. (2011) Between Heat and Light: The opportunity in moral panics, Crime Media Culture, 7(3), 277–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741659011417606 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Meyer, A. (2007) The Child at Risk: Paedophiles, media responses and public opinion. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Nieuwenhuys, O. (2009) Editorial: Is There An Indian Childhood? Childhood, 16(147), 147–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0907568209104398 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Postman, N. (1985) The Disappearance of Childhood, Childhood Education, 61(4), 286–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1985.10520201 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Robinson, K.H. (2008) In the Name of ‘Childhood Innocence’: A discursive exploration of the moral panic associated with childhood and sexuality, Cultural Studies Review, 14(2), 113–129. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Robinson, K.H. (2013) Innocence, Knowledge and the Construction of Childhood: The contradictory nature of sexuality and censorship in children's contemporary lives. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Robinson, K.H. & Carmody, M. (2011) Precarious Pedagogies: Sexuality, children, parents and educational policy. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education conference, Hobart, Tasmania, 27 November-1 December. Google Scholar | |
| Robinson, K.H. & Davies, C. (2008) ‘She's Kickin' Ass, That's What She's Doing!’: Deconstructing childhood ‘innocence’ in media representations, Australian Feminist Studies, 23(57), 343–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08164640802233294 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Silin, J. (2013) At a Loss: Scared and excited, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 14(1), 16–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2013.14.1.16 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Spigel, L. (1998) Seducing the Innocent: Childhood and television in postwar America, in Jenkins, H. (Ed.) The Children's Culture Reader, pp. 110–135) New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar |
